Literature DB >> 21523594

Pediatric oncology and the future of oncological imaging.

Stephan D Voss1.   

Abstract

The future of pediatric oncology will be influenced by changes in drug design and treatment strategy, with genomic medicine and molecular-based diagnostics and therapeutics playing increasingly important roles. The role of imaging as a means of measuring response to therapy has also evolved, with the development of new technologies and higher sensitivity means of detecting tumors. Conventional anatomical imaging techniques are being increasingly supplemented with functional techniques, including FDG-PET imaging and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. The risk-adapted treatment regimens of the past, which led to improved event-free and overall survival in many pediatric cancers, have paved the way for new response-based treatment paradigms. Response-based approaches seek to identify patients with a high likelihood of cure, treating them less aggressively, while those not responding to therapy are identified early and redirected into more aggressive therapeutic regimens. These advances will require concurrent development of imaging biomarkers as surrogates of early response to therapy. Incorporating these techniques into new response-directed treatment algorithms will be crucial as personalized medicine and molecular-targeted, tumor-specific therapies gain acceptance for the treatment of children with cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21523594     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-011-2008-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  53 in total

1.  Antitumor activity of hu14.18-IL2 in patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group (COG) phase II study.

Authors:  Suzanne Shusterman; Wendy B London; Stephen D Gillies; Jacquelyn A Hank; Stephan D Voss; Robert C Seeger; C Patrick Reynolds; Jennifer Kimball; Mark R Albertini; Barrett Wagner; Jacek Gan; Jens Eickhoff; Kenneth B DeSantes; Susan L Cohn; Toby Hecht; Brian Gadbaw; Ralph A Reisfeld; John M Maris; Paul M Sondel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Multiparametric imaging of tumor response to therapy.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Kenneth A Miles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Pilot study of F(18)-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/computerised tomography in Wilms' tumour: correlation with conventional imaging, pathology and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Joanna Begent; Neil J Sebire; Gill Levitt; Penelope Brock; Kathy Pritchard Jones; Peter Ell; Isky Gordon; John Anderson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Taro Takahara; Reiji Ochiai; Kazuhiro Katahira; Marc Van Cauteren; Yutaka Imai; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Peter R Luijten
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging pharmacodynamic biomarker study of sorafenib in metastatic renal carcinoma.

Authors:  Olwen M Hahn; Cheng Yang; Milica Medved; Gregory Karczmar; Emily Kistner; Theodore Karrison; Elizabeth Manchen; Myrosia Mitchell; Mark J Ratain; Walter M Stadler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Tumors in pediatric patients at diffusion-weighted MR imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity.

Authors:  Paul D Humphries; Neil J Sebire; Marilyn J Siegel; Øystein E Olsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Radiologic measurements of tumor response to treatment: practical approaches and limitations.

Authors:  Chikako Suzuki; Hans Jacobsson; Thomas Hatschek; Michael R Torkzad; Katarina Bodén; Yvonne Eriksson-Alm; Elisabeth Berg; Hirofumi Fujii; Atsushi Kubo; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  Imaging in clinical trials.

Authors:  P Murphy; D-M Koh
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Beyond RECIST: molecular and functional imaging techniques for evaluation of response to targeted therapy.

Authors:  I M E Desar; C M L van Herpen; H W M van Laarhoven; J O Barentsz; W J G Oyen; W T A van der Graaf
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 12.111

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  PET and MR imaging: the odd couple or a match made in heaven?

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Alexander R Guimaraes; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Association of Tumor [18F]FDG Activity and Diffusion Restriction with Clinical Outcomes of Rhabdomyosarcomas.

Authors:  Arian Pourmehdi Lahiji; Tatianie Jackson; Hossein Nejadnik; Rie von Eyben; Daniel Rubin; Sheri L Spunt; Andrew Quon; Heike Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT Imaging in Childhood Malignancies

Authors:  Nilüfer Bıçakçı; Murat Elli
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2021-02-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.