Literature DB >> 21522466

Methyl 2-(3-oxo-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,4-benzothia-zin-4-yl)acetate.

Yamna Barryala, Stéphane Massip, Saïd Lazar, El Mokhtar Essassi, Hafid Zouihri.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C(11)H(11)NO(3)S, the mol-ecules are linked by inter-molecular C-H⋯O hydrogen-bond inter-actions. The heterocyclic thia-zine ring adopts a conformation inter-mediate between twist and boat.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21522466      PMCID: PMC3051955          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811006477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to the synthesis of benzothia­zines, see: Harmata et al. (2005 ▶). For the pharmacological activity of benzothia­zine derivatives, see: Lopatina et al. (1982 ▶). For related structures, see: Saeed et al. (2010 ▶); Aouine et al. (2010 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C11H11NO3S M = 237.27 Monoclinic, a = 17.347 (5) Å b = 8.724 (2) Å c = 7.274 (1) Å β = 98.71 (2)° V = 1088.1 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Cu Kα radiation μ = 2.59 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.20 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.625, T max = 0.697 1852 measured reflections 1852 independent reflections 1654 reflections with I > 2σ(I) 2 standard reflections every 90 min intensity decay: none

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.043 wR(F 2) = 0.123 S = 1.03 1852 reflections 147 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.28 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1989 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: CAD-4 Software; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811006477/bt5472sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811006477/bt5472Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C11H11NO3SF(000) = 496
Mr = 237.27Dx = 1.448 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54180 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 17.347 (5) Åθ = 25.0–35.0°
b = 8.724 (2) ŵ = 2.59 mm1
c = 7.274 (1) ÅT = 296 K
β = 98.71 (2)°Prism, colourless
V = 1088.1 (4) Å30.20 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm
Z = 4
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer1654 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.000
graphiteθmax = 64.9°, θmin = 2.6°
ω–2θ scansh = −20→20
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = 0→10
Tmin = 0.625, Tmax = 0.697l = 0→8
1852 measured reflections2 standard reflections every 90 min
1852 independent reflections intensity decay: none
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.123w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0891P)2 + 0.2952P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1852 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.31 e Å3
147 parametersΔρmin = −0.28 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.025 (2)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.06412 (11)1.0010 (2)−0.1876 (3)0.0408 (5)
C120.34845 (11)0.9981 (2)−0.1202 (3)0.0425 (5)
C130.38184 (11)1.1551 (2)−0.0708 (3)0.0385 (5)
C160.48971 (13)1.3152 (3)−0.0896 (3)0.0523 (6)
C20.06020 (13)1.0995 (2)−0.3366 (3)0.0462 (5)
C30.12837 (14)1.1575 (2)−0.3843 (3)0.0477 (5)
C40.19978 (12)1.1181 (2)−0.2852 (3)0.0411 (5)
C50.13542 (10)0.9596 (2)−0.0860 (2)0.0342 (4)
C60.20474 (10)1.0183 (2)−0.1350 (2)0.0325 (4)
C80.29001 (11)0.9244 (2)0.1449 (3)0.0424 (5)
C90.22014 (12)0.9212 (3)0.2432 (3)0.0480 (5)
H10.01830.9615−0.15450.049*
H12A0.33630.9889−0.25440.051*
H12B0.38700.9207−0.07610.051*
H16A0.45701.3905−0.15890.078*
H16B0.53941.3128−0.13250.078*
H16C0.49701.34130.04010.078*
H20.01221.1265−0.40410.055*
H30.12621.2242−0.48470.057*
H40.24511.1588−0.31920.049*
H9A0.20641.02510.27300.058*
H9B0.23270.86490.35890.058*
N70.27801 (9)0.97159 (18)−0.0378 (2)0.0371 (4)
O110.35438 (9)0.8896 (2)0.2240 (2)0.0645 (5)
O140.34929 (8)1.25486 (18)−0.0003 (2)0.0561 (5)
O150.45320 (8)1.16608 (16)−0.1160 (2)0.0454 (4)
S100.13827 (3)0.83215 (6)0.10137 (7)0.0470 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0361 (10)0.0407 (10)0.0462 (11)−0.0021 (8)0.0082 (8)−0.0077 (8)
C20.0487 (11)0.0415 (11)0.0450 (11)0.0044 (9)−0.0043 (9)−0.0055 (9)
C30.0651 (14)0.0391 (11)0.0370 (10)−0.0035 (9)0.0012 (9)0.0033 (8)
C40.0502 (11)0.0370 (10)0.0385 (10)−0.0082 (9)0.0144 (8)0.0011 (8)
C50.0378 (9)0.0294 (9)0.0373 (10)−0.0026 (7)0.0121 (7)−0.0040 (7)
C60.0359 (9)0.0287 (9)0.0343 (9)−0.0022 (7)0.0098 (7)−0.0042 (7)
N70.0312 (8)0.0376 (8)0.0447 (9)−0.0005 (6)0.0128 (6)0.0019 (7)
C80.0408 (10)0.0393 (10)0.0471 (11)0.0024 (8)0.0071 (8)0.0026 (8)
C90.0509 (11)0.0567 (13)0.0379 (10)0.0024 (10)0.0116 (9)0.0121 (9)
S100.0442 (4)0.0470 (4)0.0529 (4)−0.0048 (2)0.0170 (2)0.0152 (2)
O110.0449 (9)0.0783 (12)0.0667 (11)0.0108 (8)−0.0030 (7)0.0096 (9)
C120.0334 (9)0.0418 (11)0.0560 (12)0.0009 (8)0.0185 (8)−0.0028 (9)
C130.0295 (9)0.0454 (11)0.0419 (10)−0.0017 (8)0.0098 (7)−0.0010 (8)
O140.0455 (9)0.0543 (10)0.0735 (11)−0.0063 (7)0.0257 (8)−0.0220 (8)
O150.0317 (7)0.0491 (8)0.0579 (9)−0.0035 (5)0.0147 (6)0.0000 (6)
C160.0405 (11)0.0562 (13)0.0605 (13)−0.0111 (9)0.0085 (10)0.0037 (11)
S10—C51.7538 (17)C5—C61.402 (2)
S10—C91.800 (2)C8—C91.498 (3)
O11—C81.215 (3)C12—C131.509 (3)
O14—C131.195 (2)C1—H10.9300
O15—C131.332 (2)C2—H20.9300
O15—C161.447 (3)C3—H30.9300
N7—C61.418 (2)C4—H40.9300
N7—C81.377 (3)C9—H9A0.9700
N7—C121.459 (3)C9—H9B0.9700
C1—C21.377 (3)C12—H12A0.9700
C1—C51.389 (3)C12—H12B0.9700
C2—C31.378 (3)C16—H16A0.9600
C3—C41.379 (3)C16—H16B0.9600
C4—C61.390 (3)C16—H16C0.9600
C5—S10—C995.67 (10)C5—C1—H1120.00
C13—O15—C16115.88 (16)C1—C2—H2120.00
C6—N7—C8124.10 (15)C3—C2—H2121.00
C6—N7—C12119.55 (15)C2—C3—H3120.00
C8—N7—C12115.50 (16)C4—C3—H3120.00
C2—C1—C5121.00 (18)C3—C4—H4120.00
C1—C2—C3119.0 (2)C6—C4—H4120.00
C2—C3—C4120.93 (19)S10—C9—H9A109.00
C3—C4—C6120.73 (19)S10—C9—H9B109.00
S10—C5—C1119.76 (14)C8—C9—H9A109.00
S10—C5—C6120.32 (13)C8—C9—H9B109.00
C1—C5—C6119.92 (15)H9A—C9—H9B108.00
N7—C6—C4121.09 (16)N7—C12—H12A109.00
N7—C6—C5120.47 (14)N7—C12—H12B109.00
C4—C6—C5118.39 (16)C13—C12—H12A109.00
O11—C8—N7121.72 (18)C13—C12—H12B109.00
O11—C8—C9121.43 (19)H12A—C12—H12B108.00
N7—C8—C9116.83 (17)O15—C16—H16A109.00
S10—C9—C8111.08 (15)O15—C16—H16B109.00
N7—C12—C13111.18 (16)O15—C16—H16C109.00
O14—C13—O15124.83 (17)H16A—C16—H16B109.00
O14—C13—C12125.04 (18)H16A—C16—H16C109.00
O15—C13—C12110.13 (16)H16B—C16—H16C109.00
C2—C1—H1119.00
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C4—H4···O14i0.932.513.411 (3)164
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C4—H4⋯O140.932.513.411 (3)164
  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Benzothiazines in synthesis. A total synthesis of pseudopteroxazole.

Authors:  Michael Harmata; Xuechuan Hong
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 6.005

3.  2-(3-Oxo-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,4-benzothia-zin-4-yl)acetohydrazide.

Authors:  Azher Saeed; Zaid Mahmood; Shiyao Yang; Saeed Ahmad; Muhammad Salim
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-08-11

4.  10-(Prop-2-yn-yl)-10H-phenothia-zine.

Authors:  Younas Aouine; Anouar Alami; Abdelilah El Hallaoui; Abdelrhani Elachqar; Hafid Zouihri
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-20

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Ethyl 2-{5-[(3-oxo-3,4-di-hydro-2H-1,4-benzo-thia-zin-4-yl)meth-yl]-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl}acetate.

Authors:  Nada Kheira Sebbar; Abdelfettah Zerzouf; El Mokhtar Essassi; Mohamed Saadi; Lahcen El Ammari
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-01-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.