Literature DB >> 21521191

Divergent patterns of integration and reduced constraint in the human hip and the origins of bipedalism.

Mark W Grabowski1, John D Polk, Charles C Roseman.   

Abstract

When compared to other hominids--great apes including humans--the human pelvis reveals a fundamental reorganization of bony morphology comprised of multiple trait-level changes, many of which are associated with bipedal locomotion. Establishing how patterns of integration--correlations and covariances among traits--within the pelvis have evolved in concert with morphology is essential to explaining this evolutionary transition because integration may facilitate or constrain morphological evolution. Here, we show that the human hip bone has significantly lower levels of integration and constraint overall when compared to other hominids, that the focus of these changes is on traits hypothesized to play major functional roles in bipedalism, and we provide evidence that the human hip was reintegrated in a pattern distinct from other members of this group. Additionally, the evolutionary transition from a nonhuman great ape-like to human hip bone morphology was significantly easier to traverse using the human integration pattern in each comparison, which suggests hominin patterns may have evolved to facilitate this transition. Our results suggest natural selection for bipedalism broke down earlier hominid integration patterns, allowing relevant traits to respond to separate selection pressures to a greater extent than was previously possible, and reintegrated traits in a way that could have facilitated evolution along the vector specifying ancestral hominid and hominin morphological differences.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21521191     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01226.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  15 in total

1.  Covariation between human pelvis shape, stature, and head size alleviates the obstetric dilemma.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mutation predicts 40 million years of fly wing evolution.

Authors:  David Houle; Geir H Bolstad; Kim van der Linde; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  How many more? Sample size determination in studies of morphological integration and evolvability.

Authors:  Mark Grabowski; Arthur Porto
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 7.781

4.  Constraint, natural selection, and the evolution of human body form.

Authors:  Kristen R R Savell; Benjamin M Auerbach; Charles C Roseman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Early Homo, plasticity and the extended evolutionary synthesis.

Authors:  Susan C Antón; Christopher W Kuzawa
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Condition dependence of phenotypic integration and the evolvability of genitalic traits in a neriid fly.

Authors:  Zachariah Wylde; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Human variation in the shape of the birth canal is significant and geographically structured.

Authors:  Lia Betti; Andrea Manica
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Pelvic sexual dimorphism among species monomorphic in body size: relationship to relative newborn body mass.

Authors:  Robert G Tague
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.416

9.  Reconstructing cranial evolution in an extinct hominin.

Authors:  Karen L Baab
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma.

Authors:  Mihaela Pavličev; Roberto Romero; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 10.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.