Literature DB >> 21520155

Passive bioelectrical properties for assessing high- and low-grade prostate adenocarcinoma.

Ryan J Halter1, Alan R Schned, John A Heaney, Alex Hartov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The electrical properties of prostate tissues are dependent on cellular morphology and have been demonstrated to distinguish between benign and malignant formations. Because Gleason grading is also based on tissue architecture we explored the hypothesis that the electrical properties might also provide discriminating power between high- and low-Gleason grade cancers.
METHODS: Electrical properties (σ, ε, Δσ, σ(∞) , f(c) , and α) were gauged from 546 prostate tissue samples and correlated with histopathological assessment. Primary and secondary Gleason grades and a Gleason score were assigned to the tissues identified as cancer. We evaluated how well differently graded cancers were separable from benign tissues and from each other on the basis of these properties using ROC curves.
RESULTS: Of the 546 prostate tissue samples, 71 were identified as cancer and 465 as benign. ε, Δσ, σ(∞) , and f(c) provided the most discriminatory power with area under the curves (AUCs) ranging from 0.77-0.82 for detecting any cancer, 0.72-0.8 for low-grade cancer, and increasing to 0.87-0.9 for detecting high-grade cancer. Further, ε, Δσ, and σ(∞) , provided AUCs ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 for discriminating between low- and high-grade cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the electrical properties to identify prostate cancer is improved when high-grade cancers are sought. These electrical properties can also discriminate between different grades of tumors. These findings suggest that technologies being developed to sense and image these properties in vivo may discriminate between aggressive and indolent lesions.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21520155     DOI: 10.1002/pros.21393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  6 in total

1.  Phantom Studies of Fused-Data TREIT Using Only Biopsy-Probe Electrodes.

Authors:  Ethan K Murphy; Xiaotian Wu; Alicia C Everitt; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Transrectal electrical impedance tomography of the prostate: spatially coregistered pathological findings for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Yuqing Wan; Andrea Borsic; John Heaney; John Seigne; Alan Schned; Michael Baker; Shaun Wason; Alex Hartov; Ryan Halter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Prostate cancer detection using combined auto-fluorescence and light reflectance spectroscopy: ex vivo study of human prostates.

Authors:  Vikrant Sharma; Ephrem O Olweny; Payal Kapur; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Claus G Roehrborn; Hanli Liu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Diagnosing early Barrett's neoplasia and oesophageal squamous cell neoplasia by bioimpedance spectroscopy in human tissue.

Authors:  Mate Knabe; Christian Kurz; Thorsten Knoll; Thomas Velten; Michael Vieth; Hendrik Manner; Christian Ell; Oliver Pech
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Electrical conductivity-based contrast imaging for characterizing prostatic tissues: in vivo animal feasibility study.

Authors:  Yong Soo Cho; Young Hoe Hur; Hyun Ju Seon; Jin Woong Kim; Hyung Joong Kim
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 6.  The clinical application of electrical impedance technology in the detection of malignant neoplasms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Angela A Pathiraja; Ruwan A Weerakkody; Alexander C von Roon; Paul Ziprin; Richard Bayford
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.531

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.