Literature DB >> 21519940

Titanium back plate for a PMMA keratoprosthesis: clinical outcomes.

Amit Todani1, Joseph B Ciolino, Jared D Ament, Kathryn A Colby, Roberto Pineda, Michael W Belin, James V Aquavella, James Chodosh, Claes H Dohlman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: To compare the rate of retroprosthetic membrane (RPM) formation in Boston Keratoprosthesis (BKPro) with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) versus titanium backplates.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative chart review.
METHODS: Multicenter study population: a total of 78 eyes with keratoprosthesis implants with either PMMA or titanium backplates were included in the study. To be included in the study, all subjects had to have completed a minimum of 6-month follow-up period. Incidence of RPM development at 6-month postoperative period was noted across the study population. PMMA and titanium backplates were then compared by their rate of association with subsequent RPM.
RESULTS: Twenty-three out of 55 eyes (41.8%) with PMMA backplates and three out of 23 eyes (13.0%) with titanium backplates had developed an RPM at 6 months after implantation. The titanium backplates were associated with significantly less RPM formation than PMMA backplates (p = 0.014, Chi-square test).
CONCLUSIONS: Titanium seems to be associated with less RPM formation than PMMA when used as a material for the BKPro back plate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21519940     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-011-1684-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  6 in total

1.  Experimental study of plastic material as replacement for the cornea; a preliminary report.

Authors:  W STONE; E HERBERT
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1953-06       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 2.  Metallic biomaterials.

Authors:  Mitsuo Niinomi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Titanium and bioactive glass-ceramic coated titanium as materials for keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  R J Linnola; R P Happonen; O H Andersson; E Vedel; A U Yli-Urpo; U Krause; L Laatikainen
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Type I Boston keratoprosthesis with cataract extraction and intraocular lens placement for visual rehabilitation of herpes zoster ophthalmicus: the "KPro Triple".

Authors:  A Todani; P Gupta; K Colby
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The Boston Keratoprosthesis: comparing corneal epithelial cell compatibility with titanium and PMMA.

Authors:  Jared D Ament; Sandra J Spurr-Michaud; Claes H Dohlman; Ilene K Gipson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Boston keratoprosthesis outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Hall F Chew; Brandon D Ayres; Kristin M Hammersmith; Christopher J Rapuano; Peter R Laibson; Jonathan S Myers; Ya-Ping Jin; Elisabeth J Cohen
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.651

  6 in total
  18 in total

1.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the New York Eye and Ear experience.

Authors:  A P Patel; E I Wu; D C Ritterband; J A Seedor
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Study on the optical property and biocompatibility of a tissue engineering cornea.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Yukiko Nakahara; Dwight Xuan; Di Wu; Fang-Kun Zhao; Xiao-Yan Li; Jin-Song Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Effects of gamma radiation sterilization on the structural and biological properties of decellularized corneal xenografts.

Authors:  Mohammad Mirazul Islam; Roholah Sharifi; Shamina Mamodaly; Rakibul Islam; Daniel Nahra; Dina B Abusamra; Pui Chuen Hui; Yashar Adibnia; Mehdi Goulamaly; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Andrea Cruzat; Jing Kong; Per H Nilsson; Pablo Argüeso; Tom Eirik Mollnes; James Chodosh; Claes H Dohlman; Miguel Gonzalez-Andrades
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Artificial corneas versus donor corneas for repeat corneal transplants.

Authors:  Masako Chen; Sueko M Ng; Esen K Akpek; Sumayya Ahmad
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-13

Review 5.  Artificial corneas versus donor corneas for repeat corneal transplants.

Authors:  Esen K Akpek; Majed Alkharashi; Frank S Hwang; Sueko M Ng; Kristina Lindsley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-05

Review 6.  Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in corneal transplantation-A review.

Authors:  Wei Zhong; Mario Montana; Samuel M Santosa; Irene D Isjwara; Yu-Hui Huang; Kyu-Yeon Han; Christopher O'Neil; Ashley Wang; Maria Soledad Cortina; Jose de la Cruz; Qiang Zhou; Mark I Rosenblatt; Jin-Hong Chang; Dimitri T Azar
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 7.  Keratoprostheses for corneal blindness: a review of contemporary devices.

Authors:  Venkata S Avadhanam; Helen E Smith; Christopher Liu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-16

8.  Titanium Coating of the Boston Keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Borja Salvador-Culla; Kyung Jae Jeong; Paraskevi Evi Kolovou; Homer H Chiang; James Chodosh; Claes H Dohlman; Daniel S Kohane
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Effect of Penetrating Keratoplasty and Keratoprosthesis Implantation on the Posterior Segment of the Eye.

Authors:  Alja Črnej; Masahiro Omoto; Thomas H Dohlman; Miguel Gonzalez-Andrades; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Andrea Cruzat; T H Khanh Vu; Marianne Doorenbos; Dong Feng Chen; Claes H Dohlman; Reza Dana
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  Boston keratoprosthesis - Clinical outcomes with wider geographic use and expanding indications - A systematic review.

Authors:  Khalid Al Arfaj
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.