Literature DB >> 21518722

Chemical-management policy: prioritizing children's health.

.   

Abstract

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that chemical-management policy in the United States be revised to protect children and pregnant women and to better protect other populations. The Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) was passed in 1976. It is widely recognized to have been ineffective in protecting children, pregnant women, and the general population from hazardous chemicals in the marketplace. It does not take into account the special vulnerabilities of children in attempting to protect the population from chemical hazards. Its processes are so cumbersome that in its more than 30 years of existence, the TSCA has been used to regulate only 5 chemicals or chemical classes of the tens of thousands of chemicals that are in commerce. Under the TSCA, chemical companies have no responsibility to perform premarket testing or postmarket follow-up of the products that they produce; in fact, the TSCA contains disincentives for the companies to produce such data. Voluntary programs have been inadequate in resolving problems. Therefore, chemical-management policy needs to be rewritten in the United States. Manufacturers must be responsible for developing information about chemicals before marketing. The US Environmental Protection Agency must have the authority to demand additional safety data about a chemical and to limit or stop the marketing of a chemical when there is a high degree of suspicion that the chemical might be harmful to children, pregnant women, or other populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21518722     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-0523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  11 in total

1.  Toxic environmental chemicals: the role of reproductive health professionals in preventing harmful exposures.

Authors:  Patrice Sutton; Tracey J Woodruff; Joanne Perron; Naomi Stotland; Jeanne A Conry; Mark D Miller; Linda C Giudice
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Aquatic models, genomics and chemical risk management.

Authors:  Keith C Cheng; David E Hinton; Carolyn J Mattingly; Antonio Planchart
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.228

3.  Urinary organophosphate ester concentrations in relation to ultra-processed food consumption in the general US population.

Authors:  Hyunju Kim; Casey M Rebholz; Eugenia Wong; Jessie P Buckley
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 4.  Food Additives and Child Health.

Authors:  Leonardo Trasande; Rachel M Shaffer; Sheela Sathyanarayana
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Fetal heart rate and motor activity associations with maternal organochlorine levels: results of an exploratory study.

Authors:  Janet A DiPietro; Meghan F Davis; Kathleen A Costigan; Dana Boyd Barr
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Fetal exposure to environmental neurotoxins in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chuen-Bin Jiang; Hsing-Cheng Hsi; Chun-Hua Fan; Ling-Chu Chien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Project TENDR: Targeting Environmental Neuro-Developmental Risks The TENDR Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Deborah Bennett; David C Bellinger; Linda S Birnbaum; Asa Bradman; Aimin Chen; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Stephanie M Engel; M Daniele Fallin; Alycia Halladay; Russ Hauser; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Carol F Kwiatkowski; Bruce P Lanphear; Emily Marquez; Melanie Marty; Jennifer McPartland; Craig J Newschaffer; Devon Payne-Sturges; Heather B Patisaul; Frederica P Perera; Beate Ritz; Jennifer Sass; Susan L Schantz; Thomas F Webster; Robin M Whyatt; Tracey J Woodruff; R Thomas Zoeller; Laura Anderko; Carla Campbell; Jeanne A Conry; Nathaniel DeNicola; Robert M Gould; Deborah Hirtz; Katie Huffling; Philip J Landrigan; Arthur Lavin; Mark Miller; Mark A Mitchell; Leslie Rubin; Ted Schettler; Ho Luong Tran; Annie Acosta; Charlotte Brody; Elise Miller; Pamela Miller; Maureen Swanson; Nsedu Obot Witherspoon
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Environmental health reform in a synthetic world.

Authors:  Shetal Shah; Shale Wong; Cynthia Bearer; Heather Brumberg
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.756

9.  A Case Study of Environmental Injustice: The Failure in Flint.

Authors:  Carla Campbell; Rachael Greenberg; Deepa Mankikar; Ronald D Ross
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Environmental Chemical Assessment in Clinical Practice: Unveiling the Elephant in the Room.

Authors:  Nicole Bijlsma; Marc M Cohen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.