Literature DB >> 21517790

An empirical Bayes' approach to joint analysis of multiple microarray gene expression studies.

Lingyan Ruan1, Ming Yuan.   

Abstract

With the prevalence of gene expression studies and the relatively low reproducibility caused by insufficient sample sizes, it is natural to consider joint analysis that could combine data from different experiments effectively to achieve improved accuracy. We present in this article a model-based approach for better identification of differentially expressed genes by incorporating data from different studies. The model can accommodate in a seamless fashion a wide range of studies including those performed at different platforms by fitting each data with different set of parameters, and/or under different but overlapping biological conditions. Model-based inferences can be done in an empirical Bayes' fashion. Because of the information sharing among studies, the joint analysis dramatically improves inferences based on individual analysis. Simulation studies and real data examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach under a variety of complications that often arise in practice.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21517790      PMCID: PMC6201754          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01602.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  28 in total

1.  Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations.

Authors:  M L Lee; F C Kuo; G A Whitmore; J Sklar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A comparison of oligonucleotide and cDNA-based microarray systems.

Authors:  Nancy Mah; Anders Thelin; Tim Lu; Susanna Nikolaus; Tanja Kühbacher; Yesim Gurbuz; Holger Eickhoff; Günther Klöppel; Hans Lehrach; Björn Mellgård; Christine M Costello; Stefan Schreiber
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2004-02-13       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Estimating dataset size requirements for classifying DNA microarray data.

Authors:  Sayan Mukherjee; Pablo Tamayo; Simon Rogers; Ryan Rifkin; Anna Engle; Colin Campbell; Todd R Golub; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  Statistical issues and methods for meta-analysis of microarray data: a case study in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh; Terrence R Barette; Dan Rhodes; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 3.410

5.  Meta-analysis of microarrays: interstudy validation of gene expression profiles reveals pathway dysregulation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel R Rhodes; Terrence R Barrette; Mark A Rubin; Debashis Ghosh; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus.

Authors:  David B Allison; Xiangqin Cui; Grier P Page; Mahyar Sabripour
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Cross-study validation and combined analysis of gene expression microarray data.

Authors:  Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Giovanni Parmigiani; Xiaogang Zhong; Leslie Cope; Edward Gabrielson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  A comparison of meta-analysis methods for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Fangxin Hong; Rainer Breitling
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Prognostic meta-signature of breast cancer developed by two-stage mixture modeling of microarray data.

Authors:  Ronglai Shen; Debashis Ghosh; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  9 in total

1.  Joint analysis of differential gene expression in multiple studies using correlation motifs.

Authors:  Yingying Wei; Toyoaki Tenzen; Hongkai Ji
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  β-empirical Bayes inference and model diagnosis of microarray data.

Authors:  Mohammad Manir Hossain Mollah; M Nurul Haque Mollah; Hirohisa Kishino
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  Integrative analyses of cancer data: a review from a statistical perspective.

Authors:  Yingying Wei
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2015-05-14

4.  Simultaneous inferences based on empirical Bayes methods and false discovery rates ineQTL data analysis.

Authors:  Arindom Chakraborty; Guanglong Jiang; Malaz Boustani; Yunlong Liu; Todd Skaar; Lang Li
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  A novel joint analysis framework improves identification of differentially expressed genes in cross disease transcriptomic analysis.

Authors:  Wenyi Qin; Hui Lu
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.522

6.  Identifying differentially expressed genes from cross-site integrated data based on relative expression orderings.

Authors:  Hao Cai; Xiangyu Li; Jing Li; Qirui Liang; Weicheng Zheng; Qingzhou Guan; Zheng Guo; Xianlong Wang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 6.580

7.  Gene shaving using a sensitivity analysis of kernel based machine learning approach, with applications to cancer data.

Authors:  Md Ashad Alam; Mohammd Shahjaman; Md Ferdush Rahman; Fokhrul Hossain; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The prognostic and clinical significance of IFI44L aberrant downregulation in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Deming Ou; Ying Wu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  A Hybrid One-Way ANOVA Approach for the Robust and Efficient Estimation of Differential Gene Expression with Multiple Patterns.

Authors:  Mohammad Manir Hossain Mollah; Rahman Jamal; Norfilza Mohd Mokhtar; Roslan Harun; Md Nurul Haque Mollah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.