Literature DB >> 21517619

Geometry of nonlinear least squares with applications to sloppy models and optimization.

Mark K Transtrum1, Benjamin B Machta, James P Sethna.   

Abstract

Parameter estimation by nonlinear least-squares minimization is a common problem that has an elegant geometric interpretation: the possible parameter values of a model induce a manifold within the space of data predictions. The minimization problem is then to find the point on the manifold closest to the experimental data. We show that the model manifolds of a large class of models, known as sloppy models, have many universal features; they are characterized by a geometric series of widths, extrinsic curvatures, and parameter-effect curvatures, which we describe as a hyper-ribbon. A number of common difficulties in optimizing least-squares problems are due to this common geometric structure. First, algorithms tend to run into the boundaries of the model manifold, causing parameters to diverge or become unphysical before they have been optimized. We introduce the model graph as an extension of the model manifold to remedy this problem. We argue that appropriate priors can remove the boundaries and further improve the convergence rates. We show that typical fits will have many evaporated parameters unless the data are very accurately known. Second, "bare" model parameters are usually ill-suited to describing model behavior; cost contours in parameter space tend to form hierarchies of plateaus and long narrow canyons. Geometrically, we understand this inconvenient parametrization as an extremely skewed coordinate basis and show that it induces a large parameter-effect curvature on the manifold. By constructing alternative coordinates based on geodesic motion, we show that these long narrow canyons are transformed in many cases into a single quadratic, isotropic basin. We interpret the modified Gauss-Newton and Levenberg-Marquardt fitting algorithms as an Euler approximation to geodesic motion in these natural coordinates on the model manifold and the model graph, respectively. By adding a geodesic acceleration adjustment to these algorithms, we alleviate the difficulties from parameter-effect curvature, improving both efficiency and success rates at finding good fits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21517619     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  27 in total

1.  Turning statistical physics models into materials design engines.

Authors:  Marc Z Miskin; Gurdaman Khaira; Juan J de Pablo; Heinrich M Jaeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Design Space of the Embryonic Cell Cycle Oscillator.

Authors:  Henry H Mattingly; Moshe Sheintuch; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Maximizing the information learned from finite data selects a simple model.

Authors:  Henry H Mattingly; Mark K Transtrum; Michael C Abbott; Benjamin B Machta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Numerical Parameter Space Compression and Its Application to Biophysical Models.

Authors:  Chieh-Ting Jimmy Hsu; Gary J Brouhard; Paul François
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  PCA meets RG.

Authors:  Serena Bradde; William Bialek
Journal:  J Stat Phys       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Model reduction by manifold boundaries.

Authors:  Mark K Transtrum; Peng Qiu
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Parameter subset selection techniques for problems in mathematical biology.

Authors:  Christian Haargaard Olsen; Johnny T Ottesen; Ralph C Smith; Mette S Olufsen
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Cardiovascular regulation in response to multiple hemorrhages: analysis and parameter estimation.

Authors:  Maria-Veronica Ciocanel; Steffen S Docken; Rebecca E Gasper; Caron Dean; Brian E Carlson; Mette S Olufsen
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Statistical analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems using differential geometric sampling methods.

Authors:  Ben Calderhead; Mark Girolami
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  Ex Vivo Regional Mechanical Characterization of Porcine Pulmonary Arteries.

Authors:  N R Pillalamarri; S S Patnaik; S Piskin; P Gueldner; E A Finol
Journal:  Exp Mech       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.