Literature DB >> 21516560

Addressing multiplicity issues of a composite endpoint and its components in clinical trials.

Mohammad F Huque1, Mohamed Alosh, Rafia Bhore.   

Abstract

Randomized controlled clinical trials often use a composite endpoint as a primary endpoint especially when treatment effects or frequency of individual components of the composite are likely to be small and combining them makes clinical sense for the disease under study. An advantage of the composite endpoint is that, as it combines multiple endpoints to a single endpoint, it reduces or eliminates the multiplicity problem of testing multiple endpoints. In addition, accumulating evidence from individual endpoints into the composite endpoint can lead to better study power and reduce the study size and the duration of the trial. However, composite endpoints can also lead to ambiguous findings and consequently cause difficulty in interpreting study results, for example, when individual component endpoints of a composite show treatment effects in different directions. Also, multiplicity issues will arise if a study sponsor seeks efficacy claims for specific components of the composite or for a targeted subgroup of patients. This paper visits some of these issues and presents some solutions through applications of multiple testing strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21516560     DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2011.551327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  7 in total

1.  Graphical approaches for multiple comparison procedures using weighted Bonferroni, Simes, or parametric tests.

Authors:  Frank Bretz; Martin Posch; Ekkehard Glimm; Florian Klinglmueller; Willi Maurer; Kornelius Rohmeyer
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Large sample inference for a win ratio analysis of a composite outcome based on prioritized components.

Authors:  Ionut Bebu; John M Lachin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  An optimal Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test of mortality and a continuous outcome.

Authors:  Roland A Matsouaka; Aneesh B Singhal; Rebecca A Betensky
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  ALS/SURV: a modification of the CAFS statistic.

Authors:  Stephen A Goutman; Morton B Brown; Merit Cudkowicz; Nazem Atassi; Eva L Feldman
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.092

5.  Weighted analysis of composite endpoints with simultaneous inference for flexible weight constraints.

Authors:  Anh Nguyen Duc; Marcel Wolbers
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  A comparative review of Haute Autorité de Santé and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence health technology assessments of Ikervis® to treat severe keratitis in adult patients with dry eye disease which has not improved despite treatment with tear substitutes.

Authors:  Yasmina Iffet Eroglu
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2017-08-03

7.  Feasibility and challenges of using multiple breath washout in COPD.

Authors:  Alan S Bell; Philip J Lawrence; Dave Singh; Alexander Horsley
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-07-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.