Literature DB >> 21516381

Contrast agents as a biological marker in magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: conventional and new approaches.

Wieland H Sommer1, Steven Sourbron, Alexander Huppertz, Michael Ingrisch, Maximilian F Reiser, Christoph J Zech.   

Abstract

Liver imaging is an important clinical area in everyday practice. The clinical meaning of different lesion types in the liver can be quite different. Therefore, the result of imaging studies of the liver can change therapeutic concepts fundamentally. Contrast agents are used in the majority of MR examinations of the liver parenchyma-despite the already good soft-tissue contrast in plain MRI. This can be explained by the advantages in lesion detection and characterization of contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver. Beyond the qualitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced liver MR examinations, quantification of parameters will be the demand of the future. This can be achieved by perfusion MRI, also called dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the liver. Its basic principles and different clinical applications will be discussed in this article. Definite cut-off values to determine disease or therapeutic response will help to increase the objectivity and reliability of liver MRI in future. This is especially important in the oncological setting, where modern therapies cannot be assessed based on changes in size only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21516381     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-011-9734-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  7 in total

1.  Arterial and portal venous liver perfusion using selective spin labelling MRI.

Authors:  Hanke J Schalkx; Esben T Petersen; Nicky H G M Peters; Wouter B Veldhuis; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Josien P W Pluim; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Marijn van Stralen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Tracer-kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT: a primer.

Authors:  Michael Ingrisch; Steven Sourbron
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  DCE-MRI of the liver: effect of linear and nonlinear conversions on hepatic perfusion quantification and reproducibility.

Authors:  Shimon Aronhime; Claudia Calcagno; Guido H Jajamovich; Hadrien Arezki Dyvorne; Philip Robson; Douglas Dieterich; M Isabel Fiel; Valérie Martel-Laferriere; Manjil Chatterji; Henry Rusinek; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Quantification of liver function by linearization of a two-compartment model of gadoxetic acid uptake using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Josiah Simeth; Adam Johansson; Dawn Owen; Kyle Cuneo; Michelle Mierzwa; Mary Feng; Theodore S Lawrence; Yue Cao
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Function Using Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Monitoring Transporter-Mediated Processes in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Leonidas Georgiou; Jeffrey Penny; Glynis Nicholls; Neil Woodhouse; François-Xavier Blé; Penny L Hubbard Cristinacce; Josephine H Naish
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Assessment of gadoxetate DCE-MRI as a biomarker of hepatobiliary transporter inhibition.

Authors:  Jose L Ulloa; Simone Stahl; James Yates; Neil Woodhouse; J Gerry Kenna; Huw B Jones; John C Waterton; Paul D Hockings
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Transporter-Mediated Hepatic Disposition of Imaging Biomarker Gadoxetate in Rats.

Authors:  Daniel Scotcher; Nicola Melillo; Sirisha Tadimalla; Adam S Darwich; Sabina Ziemian; Kayode Ogungbenro; Gunnar Schütz; Steven Sourbron; Aleksandra Galetin
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.939

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.