Literature DB >> 21515592

Effects of right low atrial septal vs. right atrial appendage pacing on atrial mechanical function and dyssynchrony in patients with sinus node dysfunction and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Mei Wang1, Chung-Wah Siu, Kathy Lf Lee, Wen-Sheng Yue, Guo-Hui Yan, Stephen Lee, Chu-Pak Lau, Hung-Fat Tse.   

Abstract

AIMS: To study the effects of right low atrial septum (AS) and right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing on atrial mechanical function and dyssynchrony in patients with sinus node disease (SND) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Detailed echocardiographic examination was performed on 30 patients with SND and paroxysmal AF and a dual-chamber, dual sensing, dual response pacemaker with atrial lead implantation at AS(n= 15) or RAA(n= 15). Peak atrial velocities were recorded by pulsed tissue Doppler spectrum. The timing of atrial contractions (Ta) was measured at the middle of the left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) free wall. Intra-[standard deviation (SD) of time of Ta (Ta-SD)] and inter-atrial delay(Ta-RL) was measured as the SD of time interval among LA six segments and time difference between the LA and RA wall, respectively. The baseline clinical statuses were similar between groups. Indexes of LA function, and intra- or inter-atrial dyssynchrony were also similar during intrinsic sinus rhythm in both groups (all P> 0.05). During atrial pacing, LA ejection fraction (52 ± 16 vs. 39 ± 14%, P= 0.029) and LA active emptying fraction (34 ± 7 vs. 23 ± 15%, P= 0.012) were higher in patients with AS than RAA pacing. Atrial velocity was also higher at the RA free wall (14.3 ± 3.1 vs. 10.3 ± 4.4 cm/s, P= 0.009), LA septal (7.5 ± 2.1 vs. 5.2 ± 1.7 cm/s, P= 0.004) and lateral wall (8.6 ± 2.4 vs. 6.3 ± 3.0 cm/s, P= 0.024) during AS compared with RAA pacing. There was no difference in Ts-SD during atrial pacing, nevertheless Ta-RL was significantly prolonged in patients with RAA compared with those with AS pacing (42 ± 36 vs. 27 ± 25 ms, P= 0.011).
CONCLUSION: In patients with SND and paroxysmal AF, right low AS pacing significantly improved global and regional atrial mechanical function and synchronized inter-atrial electromechanical contraction compared with RAA pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21515592     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of the Influence of Right Atrial Septal Pacing and Appendage Pacing on an Atrial Function and Atrial Fibrillation in the Clinical Situation.

Authors:  Mariko Tanaka; Su Kanae; Maki Maki-Oi; Yasuyo Motohashi; Kousuke Takahashi; Ko Euihong; Koji Hanazawa; Mamoru Toyofuku; Masahiko Kitada; Yousuke Yuzuki; Takashi Tamura
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-06-30

2.  Atrial autonomic denervation for the treatment of long-standing symptomatic sinus bradycardia in non-elderly patients.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Weifeng Jiang; Li Zhou; Yuanlong Wang; Xiaodong Zhang; Shaohui Wu; Kai Xu; Xu Liu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Cardiac variables associated with atrial fibrillation occurrence and mortality in octogenarians implanted with dual chamber permanent pacemakers.

Authors:  Mert İlker Hayıroğlu; Tufan Çınar; Göksel Çinier; Gizem Yüksel; Levent Pay; Kıvanç Keskin; Cahit Coşkun; Gökçem Ayan; Vedat Çiçek; Ahmet İlker Tekkeşin
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.481

4.  Patient with sick sinus syndrome and implanted dual-chamber pacemaker with reduced P-wave duration following low interatrial septal pacing: Case report.

Authors:  Jakub Mercik; Aleksandra Gajek-Marecka; Jacek Marcin Zawadzki; Agnieszka Sławuta; Jacek Gajek
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Right atrial lead fixation type and lead position are associated with significant variation in complications.

Authors:  Chance M Witt; Charles J Lenz; Henry H Shih; Elisa Ebrille; Andrew N Rosenbaum; Htin Aung; Martin van Zyl; Kevin K Manocha; Abhishek J Deshmukh; David O Hodge; Siva K Mulpuru; Yong-Mei Cha; Raul E Espinosa; Samuel J Asirvatham; Christopher J McLeod
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Low interatrial septal pacing: A simple method.

Authors:  Asit Das; Dhiman Kahali; Shibananda Dutta
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-06-12

7.  Analyses of risk factors and prognosis for new-onset atrial fibrillation in elderly patients after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Chen; Xue-Jun Ren; Zhuo Liang; Zhi-Hong Han; Tao Zhang; Zhi Luo
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Impact of atrial septal pacing in left ventricular-only pacing in patients with a first-degree atrioventricular block: A case series.

Authors:  Yu Murata; Kohei Ishibashi; Kenichiro Yamagata; Chisato Izumi; Teruo Noguchi; Kengo Kusano
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-09

Review 9.  Physiological cardiac pacing: Current status.

Authors:  Asit Das; Dhiman Kahali
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-04-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.