| Literature DB >> 21515557 |
Yoshiyuki Nishio1, Mamoru Hashimoto, Kazunari Ishii, Etsuro Mori.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21515557 PMCID: PMC3188785 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.236463
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ISSN: 0022-3050 Impact factor: 10.154
Results of the neuropsychological tests
| Cognitive and behavioural domains | Tests | Patients | Normative data | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||||
| General intelligence | MMSE (/30) | 25 | 27 | 27 | 16 | 24 | 22 | ≥24 | |
| WAIS-R | VIQ | 68 | 78 | 88 | 65 | 81 | 89 | ≥85 | |
| PIQ | 85 | 106 | 93 | 66 | 91 | 91 | ≥85 | ||
| Episodic memory | WMS-R | Verbal memory index | <50 | 64 | 61 | <50 | 50 | 64 | ≥85 |
| Visual memory index | 72 | 93 | 118 | 68 | 114 | 100 | ≥85 | ||
| Attention/concentration index | 66 | 84 | 94 | 55 | 77 | 97 | ≥85 | ||
| Delayed recall index | <50 | <50 | 69 | <50 | 71 | 83 | ≥85 | ||
| Retrograde amnesia | (−) | (−) | (−) | (−) | (−) | (−) | |||
| Language/semantic knowledge | WAB | AQ | 69.2 | 90.8 | 86.4 | 71 | 83.6 | 87.6 | 97.7±3.0 |
| Spontaneous speech (/20) | 13 | 17 | 17 | 12 | 16 | 16 | 19.7±0.6 | ||
| Auditory comprehension (/10) | 7.2 | 9.8 | 7.7 | 7.2 | 9 | 9.5 | 9.8±0.1 | ||
| Repetition (/10) | 8.9 | 9.6 | 9.9 | 9.2 | 9.9 | 10 | 9.9±0.3 | ||
| Naming (/10) | 5.5 | 9 | 8.6 | 7.1 | 6.9 | 8.3 | 9.5±0.6 | ||
| Reading (/10) | 6.7 | 10 | 8.9 | 4.1 | 7.2 | 7.7 | 9.5±0.8 | ||
| Writing (/10) | 6.4 | 9.7 | 9.9 | 4 | 9.1 | 8.9 | 9.6±1.0 | ||
| Animal fluency (/min) | 4 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 11.8±4.4 | ||
| Initial fluency (/min) | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6.8±3 | ||
| Picture Naming (/100) | 74 | 97 | 84 | 66 | 86 | 89 | 98.2±2.3 | ||
| WAIS-R | Information SS | 6 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 8 | ≥7 | |
| Vocabulary SS | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 9 | ≥7 | ||
| Comprehension SS | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 5 | ≥7 | ||
| Similarities SS | 4 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 6 | ≥7 | ||
| Perceptual organisation/construction | WAIS-R | Picture completion SS | 8 | 11 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 9 | ≥7 |
| Block design SS | 5 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 12 | 11 | ≥7 | ||
| Concept formation | RCPM (/36) | 25 | 30 | 23 | 14 | 32 | 26 | 26.9±5.4 | |
| Weigl's colour-form sorting | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Psychomotor speed | WAIS-R Digit symbol SS | 6 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | ≥7 | |
| Executive/motor control | Fist-edge-palm | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ||
| 2-1 tapping | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Alternative pattern drawing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Behaviour | Apathy | (++) | (+) | (+) | (++) | (+) | (+) | ||
Score below –1 SD of the normative data.8–12
✓, passed; ✗, failed.
AQ, aphasia quotient; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; PIQ, performance intelligence quotient; RCPM, Raven's coloured progressive matrices; SS, scaled score; VIQ, verbal intelligence quotient; WAB, Western Aphasia Battery; WAIS-R, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised; WMS-R, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised.
Figure 1Transverse images from the Schaltenbrand–Wahren (S–W) atlas are shown in the left column. The structures involved in left anterior thalamic infarction are coloured. Images showing lesions (red) superimposed on the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template are indicated in the right column. The voxels that overlapped in more patients are coloured in brighter red. CeM, central medial nucleus; IML, internal medullary lamina; MTT, mammillothalamic tract; VA, ventral anterior nucleus proper; VAmc, magnocellular ventral anterior nucleus; VLa, ventral lateral anterior nucleus; VLp, ventral lateral posterior nucleus.
The thalamic and adjacent regions affected in the patients
| Thalamic regions | Patient No. | No. of patients | ||||||
| Hirai and Jones' | Hassler's | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| VA proper | Lpo | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | 6 |
| VAmc | Lpo.mc | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | 6 |
| VLa | Zo | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | 6 |
| Voa | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | ||
| Vop | (−) | (−) | (−) | (−) | (+) | (−) | ||
| Doe | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | ||
| VLp | Voi | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | 6 |
| Doi | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | ||
| VM | Vom | (−) | (+) | (−) | (−) | (−) | (−) | 1 |
| MD | Mfa | (−) | (−) | (−) | (+) | (−) | (−) | 1 |
| IML/CeM | Lam | (−) | (+) | (−) | (+) | (+) | (−) | 3 |
| R | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | 6 | |
| MTT | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | 6 | |
| ICg | (−) | (−) | (−) | (+) | (+) | (+) | 3 | |
| H | (−) | (−) | (−) | (+) | (+) | (−) | 2 | |
| STN | (−) | (−) | (−) | (+) | (−) | (−) | 1 | |
The nomenclature for the thalamic nuclei is according to Hirai and Jones and Hassler.
CeM, central medial nucleus; H, fields of Forel; ICg, genu of the internal capsule; IML, internal medullary lamina; MD, mediodorsal nucleus; MTT, mammillothalamic tract; R, reticular nucleus; STN, subthalamic nucleus; VA, ventral anterior nucleus; VAmc, magnocellular ventral anterior nucleus; VLa, ventral lateral anterior nucleus; VLp, ventral lateral posterior nucleus; VM, ventral medial nucleus.
Figure 2Results of the voxelwise group comparison of positron emission tomography. Regions with regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) reduction are superimposed on the mean normalised MRIs of the patients. The table indicates relative decrease and increase in rCBF in patients with left anterior thalamic infarction compared to controls. The height and extent thresholds were p<0.001 uncorrected and 400 mm3, respectively. LATI, left anterior thalamic infarct.
Left/right asymmetry indices obtained from the regions of interest- (ROI) based positron emission tomography analysis
| Patients | Controls (n=6) | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 95% CI | ||
| Inferior frontal | 1.03 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 1.37 | |||
| Middle frontal | 0.93 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 0.86 | 1.25 | |||
| Frontal operculum | 1.08 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 1.29 | |
| Lateral orbital frontal* | 1.14 | 0.97 | 1.20 | |||||
| Anterior cingulate* | 0.99 | 0.95 | 1.18 | |||||
| Central | 0.97 | 1.04 | 0.87 | 1.11 | ||||
| Temporal pole* | 0.95 | 1.17 | ||||||
| Inferior temporal* | 1.15 | 1.02 | 0.95 | 1.21 | ||||
| Middle temporal | 1.05 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 0.85 | 1.05 | |
| Superior temporal | 1.05 | 1.20 | 1.14 | 1.04 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 1.20 | |
| Medial temporal | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 1.05 | |||
| Inferior parietal* | 1.17 | 1.00 | 1.27 | |||||
| Posterior cingulated | 0.94 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 1.10 | |
| Precuneus† | 0.95 | 0.91 | 1.08 | |||||
| Cuneus* | 1.12 | 1.07 | 1.05 | 1.25 | ||||
| Calcarine* | 1.11 | 0.91 | 1.16 | |||||
| Lingual | 1.24 | 1.14 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 1.12 | 0.96 | 0.88 | 1.38 |
| Fusiform | 0.95 | 0.98 | 1.02 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.09 | |
| Anterior striatum | 1.07 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 1.13 | ||
| Posterior striatum | 1.18 | 1.19 | 1.14 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 1.21 | |
| Thalamus* | 0.92 | 1.19 | ||||||
Indices lower and higher than 95% CI of the controls are shown in bold and italic, respectively.
*and † indicate ROIs in which laterality indices are lower and higher than 95% CI of the controls in four or more patients, respectively.