Literature DB >> 21514246

Technology for behavioral assessment and intervention in bariatric surgery.

J Graham Thomas1, Dale S Bond, David B Sarwer, Rena R Wing.   

Abstract

Patients' behaviors have a substantial effect on postoperative outcomes after bariatric surgery. Thus, studying patients' behaviors is essential to learning how to optimize postoperative outcomes. To be most effective, this research should use the best tools available for assessing patient behavior. However, the traditional methods of behavioral assessment (e.g., questionnaires and clinical interviews) rely primarily on patients' retrospective self-report, which is often inaccurate. Despite their significant shortcomings, these types of assessments continue to predominate. However, technological advances now allow for much greater accuracy in the assessment of patient behaviors by way of devices, such as accelerometers and palmtop computers. Accelerometers allow for patients' physical activity to be measured objectively in great detail, in real-time, in the patients' natural environment. Ecologic momentary assessment using a palmtop computer or mobile telephone allows the assessment of important behaviors, such as eating and activity behaviors, to be measured, with many of the same advantages. Furthermore, new computer-assisted technologies are in development that will further facilitate behavioral assessment. Technology also has the potential to play an important role in the delivery of behavioral interventions aimed at bariatric surgery patients, given that Internet-based treatments have already proved effective for nonoperative weight loss and are often highly cost-effective and easily disseminable. Future research should evaluate the efficacy of these programs for bariatric patients.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21514246      PMCID: PMC3422738          DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  61 in total

1.  Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004.

Authors:  Charles E Matthews; Kong Y Chen; Patty S Freedson; Maciej S Buchowski; Bettina M Beech; Russell R Pate; Richard P Troiano
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Predictors of success after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a multivariate analysis of socioeconomic factors.

Authors:  R Lutfi; A Torquati; N Sekhar; W O Richards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years.

Authors:  Nicolas V Christou; Didier Look; Lloyd D Maclean
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy.

Authors:  Thomas L Webb; Judith Joseph; Lucy Yardley; Susan Michie
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Physical activity predicts weight loss following gastric bypass surgery: findings from a support group survey.

Authors:  Garry Welch; Cheryl Wesolowski; Bernadette Piepul; Jay Kuhn; John Romanelli; Jane Garb
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Hunger control and regular physical activity facilitate weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Susan L Colles; John B Dixon; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Pre- and postsurgery behavioral compliance, patient health, and postbariatric surgical weight loss.

Authors:  Ruzbeh Toussi; Ken Fujioka; Karen J Coleman
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 8.  Accelerometers and pedometers: methodology and clinical application.

Authors:  Kirsten Corder; Søren Brage; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 9.  Mobile eHealth interventions for obesity: a timely opportunity to leverage convergence trends.

Authors:  James T Tufano; Bryant T Karras
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Weight-loss maintenance in successful weight losers: surgical vs non-surgical methods.

Authors:  D S Bond; S Phelan; T M Leahey; J O Hill; R R Wing
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  26 in total

1.  Predictors and correlates of follow-up visit adherence among adolescents receiving laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Robyn Sysko; Tom B Hildebrandt; Simona Kaplan; Stephanie K Brewer; Jeffrey L Zitsman; Michael J Devlin
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.734

2.  A Rehabilomics framework for personalized and translational rehabilitation research and care for individuals with disabilities: Perspectives and considerations for spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Amy K Wagner
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  Lifestyle management for enhancing outcomes after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Melissa Kalarchian; Melanie Turk; Jennifer Elliott; William Gourash
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Project HELP: a Remotely Delivered Behavioral Intervention for Weight Regain after Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Lauren E Bradley; Evan M Forman; Stephanie G Kerrigan; Stephanie P Goldstein; Meghan L Butryn; J Graham Thomas; James D Herbert; David B Sarwer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Tracking physical activity using smart phone apps: assessing the ability of a current app and systematically collecting patient recommendations for future development.

Authors:  J Murphy; T Uttamlal; K A Schmidtke; I Vlaev; D Taylor; M Ahmad; S Alsters; P Purkayastha; S Scholtz; R Ramezani; A R Ahmed; H Chahal; A Darzi; A I F Blakemore
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  The Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) is not sensitive to cognitive impairment in bariatric surgery candidates.

Authors:  Rachel Galioto; Sarah Garcia; Mary Beth Spitznagel; Gladys Strain; Michael Devlin; Ross D Crosby; James E Mitchell; John Gunstad
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 4.734

7.  Ecological momentary assessment of the relationship between intention and physical activity behavior in bariatric surgery patients.

Authors:  Dale S Bond; J Graham Thomas; Beth A Ryder; Sivamainthan Vithiananthan; Dieter Pohl; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-03

8.  Cognitive function is linked to adherence to bariatric postoperative guidelines.

Authors:  Mary Beth Spitznagel; Rachel Galioto; Kristen Limbach; John Gunstad; Leslie Heinberg
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  Can weight loss improve migraine headaches in obese women? Rationale and design of the Women's Health and Migraine (WHAM) randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dale S Bond; Kevin C O'Leary; J Graham Thomas; Richard B Lipton; George D Papandonatos; Julie Roth; Lucille Rathier; Richard Daniello; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 10.  Measurement and Intervention on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviours in Bariatric Surgery Patients: Emphasis on Mobile Technology.

Authors:  Dale S Bond; J Graham Thomas
Journal:  Eur Eat Disord Rev       Date:  2015-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.