Literature DB >> 21513761

Shedding of Ann Arbor strain live attenuated influenza vaccine virus in children 6-59 months of age.

Raburn M Mallory1, Tingting Yi, Christopher S Ambrose.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A trivalent, Ann Arbor strain, live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is approved for use in children 24 months of age and older in a number of countries. The incidence, duration, and other parameters of viral shedding after vaccination with LAIV have not been fully described in children ≤ 5 years of age.
METHODS: An open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study assessed viral shedding and safety in 200 children 6-59 months of age after a single, intranasal dose of LAIV in 2006. Participants were enrolled into 2 age groups: 6-23 months (n=100) and 24-59 months (n=100) of age. Viral shedding, reactogenicity, and adverse events were assessed for 28 days postvaccination. Serious adverse events and significant new medical conditions were monitored for 180 days postvaccination.
RESULTS: Viral shedding was detected by culture in 79% (95% CI, 73-84) of vaccine recipients and occurred more frequently in children 6-23 months of age (89%) compared with children 24-59 months of age (69%). In total, 157 subjects shed vaccine, which was confirmed by RT-PCR as A/H1N1 for 128 subjects, A/H3N2 for 72 subjects, and B for 74 subjects. The incidence of shedding was highest on day 2 (59% in the 6-23 month age group; 41% in the 24-59 month age group) and most shedding occurred 1-11 days postvaccination; shedding after 11 days was infrequent and occurred almost exclusively in children 6-23 months of age. Mean titers of shed vaccine virus peaked on day 2 and were generally <10(3.0) median tissue culture infective dose/mL for both groups. Reactogenicity events peaked on day 2; runny/stuffy nose was reported most frequently (63% of all subjects).
CONCLUSION: Most children 6-59 months of age vaccinated with Ann Arbor strain LAIV shed ≥ 1 vaccine virus within 11 days of vaccination. Shedding was less common in children 24-59 months of age, a population for whom LAIV is approved for use. Titers of shed vaccine were low, which may explain why secondary transmission of LAIV was observed very infrequently in a previous controlled study conducted with young children in a daycare setting.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21513761     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  15 in total

1.  Viral interference and the live-attenuated intranasal influenza vaccine: Results from a pediatric cohort with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Constantina Boikos; Jesse Papenburg; Christine Martineau; Lawrence Joseph; David Scheifele; Mark Chilvers; Larry C Lands; Gaston De Serres; Caroline Quach
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Recommendations on the use of live, attenuated influenza vaccine (FluMist®): Supplemental Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2011-2012 An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI).

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2011-11-30

3.  Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2012-2013: Appendix I: New Evidence Review for Children 24 to 59 Months of Age: An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI).

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2012-08-01

4.  Replication of live attenuated cold-adapted H2N2 influenza virus vaccine candidates in non human primates.

Authors:  Andrew J Broadbent; Celia P Santos; Myeisha Paskel; Yumiko Matsuoka; Janine Lu; Zhongying Chen; Hong Jin; Kanta Subbarao
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Reversion of Cold-Adapted Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine into a Pathogenic Virus.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Victoria A Meliopoulos; Wei Wang; Xudong Lin; Karla M Stucker; Rebecca A Halpin; Timothy B Stockwell; Stacey Schultz-Cherry; David E Wentworth
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Adenovirus 2, Bordetella bronchiseptica, and Parainfluenza Molecular Diagnostic Assay Results in Puppies After vaccination with Modified Live Vaccines.

Authors:  R Ruch-Gallie; S Moroff; M R Lappin
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Influenza Virus Detection Following Administration of Live-Attenuated Intranasal Influenza Vaccine in Children With Cystic Fibrosis and Their Healthy Siblings.

Authors:  Constantina Boikos; Lawrence Joseph; Christine Martineau; Jesse Papenburg; David Scheifele; Larry C Lands; Gaston De Serres; Mark Chilvers; Caroline Quach
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.835

8.  Genotyping assay for differentiation of wild-type and vaccine viruses in subjects immunized with live attenuated influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Victoria Matyushenko; Irina Isakova-Sivak; Tatiana Smolonogina; Irina Dubrovina; Tatiana Tretiak; Larisa Rudenko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparative study of influenza virus replication in MDCK cells and in primary cells derived from adenoids and airway epithelium.

Authors:  Natalia A Ilyushina; Mine R Ikizler; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Larisa G Rudenko; John J Treanor; Kanta Subbarao; Peter F Wright
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 10.  New Insights into the Generation of CD4 Memory May Shape Future Vaccine Strategies for Influenza.

Authors:  Priyadharshini Devarajan; Bianca Bautista; Allen M Vong; Karl Kai McKinstry; Tara M Strutt; Susan L Swain
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.