| Literature DB >> 21513553 |
Maya P Piddocke1, Alessandro Fazio, Wanwipa Vongsangnak, Man L Wong, Hans P Heldt-Hansen, Chris Workman, Jens Nielsen, Lisbeth Olsson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Addition of sugar syrups to the basic wort is a popular technique to achieve higher gravity in beer fermentations, but it results in dilution of the free amino nitrogen (FAN) content in the medium. The multicomponent protease enzyme Flavourzyme has beneficial effect on the brewer's yeast fermentation performance during high gravity fermentations as it increases the initial FAN value and results in higher FAN uptake, higher specific growth rate, higher ethanol yield and improved flavour profile.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21513553 PMCID: PMC3107165 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Figure 1Results from the FAN measurements of initial and final samples collected during enzyme hydrolysis assays. The values are average of duplicate measurements with standard deviation < 10%.
Figure 2A. Control fermentations with glucose syrup supplementation; B. Control fermentations with maltose syrup supplementation; C. Glucose syrup supplemented fermentations with Flavourzyme addition; D. Maltose syrup supplemented fermentations with Flavourzyme addition. Arrows in the figures correspond to the sampling points for metabolome and transcriptome analysis of the studied fermentations. In the graphs, black circles represent the concentrations of glucose, black squares of fructose, black triangles of maltose, black diamonds of maltotriose, white squares of ethanol, white circles of glycerol and white triangles represent the numbers of cells/ml.
Fold change of the intracellular amino acids and amino acid intermediates compounds of the maltose syrup versus glucose syrup supplemented fermentations
| Maltose/Glucose Early exponential phase | Maltose/Glucose Stationary phase | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Flavourzyme supplementation | Control | Flavourzyme supplementation | |
| 0.19 | 4.63 | |||
| 0.05 | 5.46 | |||
| 0.13 | 0.29 | |||
| 0.12 | 6.06 | |||
| 0.14 | 3.61 | |||
| 0.38 | 4.01 | 0.95 | ||
| - | 1.41 | 0.85 | ||
| 0.13 | 0.82 | 0.55 | ||
| 0.42 | 0.89 | 0.39 | ||
| 0.26 | 1.44 | 0.73 | ||
| 1.02 | 1.82 | |||
| 0.74 | - | - | ||
| - | - | 0.37 | 0.54 | |
| 0.29 | 10.7 | |||
| - | - | - | ||
| - | 0.35 | 1.02 | 0.90 | |
| 0.35 | 0.65 | 8.95 | ||
| - | - | - | ||
| 0.29 | 13.2 | |||
| 0.50 | 3.50 | 0.84 | ||
| 0.42 | 7.38 | |||
| 0.27 | 0.46 | 13.8 | ||
| 0.27 | 3.26 | |||
The underlined numbers represents an increase in the fold change between the Flavourzyme supplemented versus non-supplemented fermentations for the respective fermentation phase. The symbol "-"indicates that the metabolites were not present in the studied conditions.
Fold change of the intracellular organic acids for the studied fermentations of the maltose syrup versus glucose syrup supplemented fermentations
| Maltose/Glucose Early exponential phase | Maltose/Glucose Stationary phase | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | 0.68 | ||
| - | 0.13 | - | 0.35 | |
| - | 0.36 | - | 0.61 | |
| - | - | 0.96 | ||
| - | - | 0.96 | ||
| 0.10 | 1.36 | 0.62 | ||
| 0.00 | 1.69 | 0.45 | ||
| 0.29 | 0.34 | |||
| - | - | 0.39 | ||
| - | 0.84 | 0.49 | ||
| 0.20 | 1.46 | |||
| 0.35 | 3.75 | |||
| 0.26 | - | - | - | |
| 0.09 | 0.64 | 0.10 | ||
| - | 0.71 | - | 0.56 | |
| - | 0.78 | - | 0.46 | |
| - | 0.01 | - | 0.71 | |
| - | - | 0.91 | ||
The underlined numbers represent the increase in the fold change for the studied metabolites between the Flavourzyme supplemented versus non-supplemented fermentations for the respective fermentation phase. The symbol "-"indicates that the metabolites were not present in the studied conditions.
Fold change of the extracellular amino and organic acids detected from the stationary phase of the studied fermentations
| Maltose/Glucose | Glucose/Maltose | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| > 20 | 0.51 | |||
| > 20 | - | 0.48 | ||
| > 20 | - | 0.11 | ||
| > 20 | - | 0.11 | ||
| 2.51 | 0.29 | 0.40 | ||
| 0.95 | 0.52 | 1.05 | 1.94 | |
| > 20 | - | 0.67 | ||
| > 20 | - | - | ||
| 0.45 | 0.23 | 2.24 | ||
| - | - | > 20 | ||
| - | - | > 20 | - | |
| > 20 | 0.36 | - | ||
| - | - | - | ||
| > 20 | - | - | - | |
The underlined numbers represent the increase in the fold change for the respective metabolites between the Flavourzyme supplemented versus non-supplemented fermentations. The symbol "-"indicates that the compound was not present in at least one of the studied conditions.
Figure 3Schematic overview of the GO annotation, based on the biological process ontology, for the significantly changed genes in maltose syrup supplemented fermentations with Flavourzyme addition. A. The main overrepresented GO annotation categories for the up regulated genes. B. The main overrepresented GO annotation categories for the down regulated genes.
Figure 4Parts of . The significantly expressed genes based on the effect of type of sugar added (maltose versus glucose) are represented by square. The significantly expressed genes based on the effect of enzyme added (enzyme versus non-enzyme supplementation) are represented by triangle. Shapes coloured in red represent the up-regulated genes and shapes coloured in green represent the down-regulated genes for the respective studied effect. Blue circle represents significantly expressed genes of the interaction effect (sugar*enzyme).
Transcription factors for the maltose supplemented fermentations, based on the t-test comparison between the control and Flavourzyme supplemented fermentations
| Transcription factors | Number of neighbours | Z-score | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 2,7 | 0,003 | |
| 141 | 2,48 | 0,007 | |
| 24 | 2,47 | 0,008 | |
| 19 | 2,34 | 0,01 | |
| 17 | 2,08 | 0,02 |
The number of neighbours indicates the number of genes regulated by the particular transcription factor. Z-score represents the score of each TF, calculated based on the score of its neighbours. The P-value gives measure of significance and all results ≤0.05 are reported.