Literature DB >> 21512874

Robustness of parameter and standard error estimates against ignoring a contextual effect of a subject-level covariate in cluster-randomized trials.

Elly J H Korendijk1, Joop J Hox, Mirjam Moerbeek, Cora J M Maas.   

Abstract

In experimental research, it is not uncommon to assign clusters to conditions. When analysing the data of such cluster-randomized trials, a multilevel analysis should be applied in order to take into account the dependency of first-level units (i.e., subjects) within a second-level unit (i.e., a cluster). Moreover, the multilevel analysis can handle covariates on both levels. If a first-level covariate is involved, usually the within-cluster effect of this covariate will be estimated, implicitly assuming the contextual effect to be equal. However, this assumption may be violated. The focus of the present simulation study is the effects of ignoring the inequality of the within-cluster and contextual covariate effects on parameter and standard error estimates of the treatment effect, which is the parameter of main interest in experimental research. We found that ignoring the inequality of the within-cluster and contextual effects does not affect the estimation of the treatment effect or its standard errors. However, estimates of the variance components, as well as standard errors of the constant, were found to be biased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21512874      PMCID: PMC3218280          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0094-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  5 in total

1.  Separating within and between effects in family studies: an application to the study of blood pressure in children.

Authors:  Vera Mann; Bianca L De Stavola; David A Leon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Design and Analysis of Monte Carlo Experiments: Attacking the Conventional Wisdom.

Authors:  A Skrondal
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  A discussion of some statistical methods for separating within-pair associations from associations among all twins in research on fetal origins of disease.

Authors:  Terence Dwyer; Leigh Blizzard
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data.

Authors:  J M Neuhaus; J D Kalbfleisch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Review of methods for handling confounding by cluster and informative cluster size in clustered data.

Authors:  Shaun Seaman; Menelaos Pavlou; Andrew Copas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Enhanced implementation of low back pain guidelines in general practice: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Allan Riis; Cathrine Elgaard Jensen; Flemming Bro; Helle Terkildsen Maindal; Karin Dam Petersen; Martin Bach Jensen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 7.327

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.