Literature DB >> 15670122

A discussion of some statistical methods for separating within-pair associations from associations among all twins in research on fetal origins of disease.

Terence Dwyer1, Leigh Blizzard.   

Abstract

Twin data can be used to gain insights into the origin of associations between factors arising in fetal life and the risk of later disease. This is because twin data afford an opportunity to conduct paired analyses that take the influence of shared factors into account. When an association that is present in an unpaired analysis is present also in a paired analysis, there is evidence that the causal pathway linking the fetal factor and the disease may have a fetal origin. If the association disappears in the paired analysis, there is evidence that it may have has arisen from a shared source such as the mother. The relevant factors include diet and socio-economic status. There are several statistical approaches to this. The simplest involves comparing, say, a coefficient from a regression of an outcome on a fetal factor for all subjects in a twin sample, with the coefficient obtained from regressing the within-pair difference in the outcome on the within-pair difference in the fetal factor. Alternative approaches involve simultaneously estimating regression parameters for between- and within-pair components. These approaches permit similar inferences about whether the association is due to individual (fetal) or shared (maternal) factors, and are valid in the circumstances that non-shared factors missing from the regression model do not influence the regression estimates.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15670122     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00615.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  9 in total

1.  Robustness of parameter and standard error estimates against ignoring a contextual effect of a subject-level covariate in cluster-randomized trials.

Authors:  Elly J H Korendijk; Joop J Hox; Mirjam Moerbeek; Cora J M Maas
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-12

2.  Association between subjective memory complaints and depressive symptoms after adjustment for genetic and family environmental factors in a Japanese twin study.

Authors:  Haruka Tanaka; Soshiro Ogata; Kayoko Omura; Chika Honda; Kei Kamide; Kazuo Hayakawa
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Optimal design strategies for sibling studies with binary exposures.

Authors:  Zhigang Li; Ian W McKeague; Lambert H Lumey
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  A study of the birth weight-obesity relation using a longitudinal cohort and sibling and twin pairs.

Authors:  Natalie S The; Linda S Adair; Penny Gordon-Larsen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Subjective wellbeing and longevity: a co-twin control study.

Authors:  Michael E Sadler; Christopher J Miller; Kaare Christensen; Matt McGue
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.587

6.  Association between salivary flow rate and depressive symptoms with adjustment for genetic and family environmental factors in Japanese twin study.

Authors:  Haruka Tanaka; Soshiro Ogata; Kazunori Ikebe; Yuko Kurushima; Kenichi Matsuda; Kaori Enoki; Kayoko Omura; Chika Honda; Kazuo Hayakawa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  A Critical Review of Statistical Methods for Twin Studies Relating Exposure to Early Life Health Conditions.

Authors:  Salvatore Fasola; Laura Montalbano; Giovanna Cilluffo; Benjamin Cuer; Velia Malizia; Giuliana Ferrante; Isabella Annesi-Maesano; Stefania La Grutta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Is the association between general cognitive ability and violent crime caused by family-level confounders?

Authors:  Thomas Frisell; Yudi Pawitan; Niklas Långström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models: estimation of treatment-covariate interactions must avoid ecological bias by separating out within-trial and across-trial information.

Authors:  Hairui Hua; Danielle L Burke; Michael J Crowther; Joie Ensor; Catrin Tudur Smith; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.373

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.