Literature DB >> 21512853

Characterizing the clustered microcalcifications on mammograms to predict the pathological classification and grading: a mathematical modeling approach.

Yuan-Zhi Shao1, Li-Zhi Liu, Meng-Jie Bie, Chan-chan Li, Yao-pan Wu, Xiao-ming Xie, Li Li.   

Abstract

In this study, we explore a mathematical model to characterize the clustered microcalcifications on mammograms for predicting the pathological classification and grading. Our database consists of both retrospective cases (78 cases) and prospective cases (31 cases) with pathologically diagnosed clusters of microcalcifications on mammograms. The microcalcifications were divided into four grades: grade 0, benign breast disease including mastopathies (n = 12) and fibroadenomas (n = 20); grade 1, well-differentiated infiltrating ductal carcinoma (n = 12); grade 2, moderately differentiated infiltrating ductal carcinoma (n = 38); grade 3, poorly differentiated infiltrating ductal carcinoma (n = 27). A feature parameter, defined as the pattern form factor of microcalcification cluster θ by us, combines five computer-extracted image parameters of microcalcification clusters of those mammograms. In every case, only one imaging was selected for modeling analysis. A total of 109 imagings were adopted in current study. We find the existence of a positive relationship between the feature parameter θ and pathological grading G of microcalcifications in retrospective cases, which was expressed as G =  6.438 + 1.186 ×  Ln <θ>. The model above has been verified further by the prospective study with a comparative evaluation accuracy of approximately 77.42%. The binary predication simply for both benignancy and malignancy was also included using same but reshuffled data, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed with ROC value 0.74351∼0.79891. As one candidate for feature parameter in computer-aided diagnosis, the pattern form factor θ of clustered microcalcifications may be useful to predict the pathological grading and classification of microcalcification clusters on mammography in breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21512853      PMCID: PMC3180539          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9381-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  20 in total

1.  Correlation between mammographic manifestations and averaged histopathologic nuclear grade using prognosis-predict scoring system for the prognosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  K S Lee; B H Han; Y K Chun; H S Kim; E E Kim
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.605

2.  Mammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtype.

Authors:  P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; T Oyama; F C Koerner; E F Halpern; R H Moore; D B Kopans
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 3.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Nonpalpable breast cancer: mammographic appearance as predictor of histologic type.

Authors:  Mercidyl Gelig Thurfjell; Anders Lindgren; Erik Thurfjell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Relationship of DNA ploidy to hormone receptor status and proliferation in invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A Spiethoff; A Schenck; M Bohrer
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Optimizing parameters for computer-aided diagnosis of microcalcifications at mammography.

Authors:  I Leichter; R Lederman; S Buchbinder; P Bamberger; B Novak; S Fields
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Breast microcalcifications: multivariate analysis of radiologic and clinical factors for carcinoma.

Authors:  Eric Fondrinier; Gérard Lorimier; Véronique Guerin-Boblet; Andrée-Françoise Bertrand; Claude Mayras; Nicolette Dauver
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-12-21       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Is the appearance of microcalcifications on mammography useful in predicting histological grade of malignancy in ductal cancer in situ?

Authors:  H P Dinkel; A M Gassel; A Tschammler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  The assessment of histological differentiation in breast cancer.

Authors:  C W Elston
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1984-02

10.  Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on magnification mammograms.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Yoshikazu Uchiyama; Ryoji Watanabe; Shigehiko Katsuragawa; Kiyoshi Namba; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of Breast: From Molecular Etiology to Therapeutic Management.

Authors:  Shelby Lynn Hophan; Olena Odnokoz; Huiping Liu; Yuan Luo; Seema Khan; William Gradishar; Zhuan Zhou; Sunil Badve; Mylin A Torres; Yong Wan
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Dooman Arefan; Aly A Mohamed; Wendie A Berg; Margarita L Zuley; Jules H Sumkin; Shandong Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Discrimination of Breast Cancer with Microcalcifications on Mammography by Deep Learning.

Authors:  Jinhua Wang; Xi Yang; Hongmin Cai; Wanchang Tan; Cangzheng Jin; Li Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Applying Data-driven Imaging Biomarker in Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Kim; Hyo-Eun Kim; Kyunghwa Han; Bong Joo Kang; Yu-Mee Sohn; Ok Hee Woo; Chan Wha Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Predictors of mammographic microcalcifications.

Authors:  Shadi Azam; Mikael Eriksson; Arvid Sjölander; Marike Gabrielson; Roxanna Hellgren; Kamila Czene; Per Hall
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Mammographic microcalcifications and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Shadi Azam; Mikael Eriksson; Arvid Sjölander; Marike Gabrielson; Roxanna Hellgren; Kamila Czene; Per Hall
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.