Literature DB >> 21512083

The spring ligament recess of the talocalcaneonavicular joint: depiction on MR images with cadaveric and histologic correlation.

Kapil R Desai1, Luis S Beltran, Jenny T Bencardino, Zehava S Rosenberg, Catherine Petchprapa, German Steiner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the anatomy and MR appearance of the spring ligament recess of the talocalcaneonavicular joint. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine MR examinations of the ankle with a spring ligament recess were prospectively collected. The size of the recess was measured. The presence of the following variables was recorded: talocalcaneonavicular joint effusion, ankle joint effusion, talar head impaction, acute lateral ankle sprain, chronic lateral ankle sprain, spring ligament tear, sinus tarsi ligament tear, talar dome osteochondral injury, and talonavicular osteoarthrosis. The Fisher exact test was performed to quantify the association of the talocalcaneonavicular effusion with the other variables. MR arthrography and dissection with histologic analysis were performed in two cadaveric ankles.
RESULTS: Twenty-four men and 25 women (average age, 39 years; range, 21-77 years) were included in the study. The average size of the fluid collection was 0.4 × 0.8 cm (range, 0.2-0.9 × 0.4-1.5 cm). The prevalence of the measured variables was talocalcaneonavicular joint effusion, 67.3%; ankle joint effusion, 61.2%; talar head impaction, 32.7%; acute lateral ankle sprain, 28.6%; chronic lateral ankle sprain, 59.2%; spring ligament tear, 14.3%; sinus tarsi ligament tear, 12.2%; talar dome osteochondral lesion, 20.4%; and talonavicular osteoarthrosis, 18.4%. There was a higher prevalence of talar head impaction among individuals with talocalcaneonavicular joint effusion (p = 0.0522). Cadaveric study revealed communication between the talocalcaneonavicular joint and the spring ligament recess.
CONCLUSION: The spring ligament recess is a synovium-lined, fluid-filled space that communicates with the talocalcaneonavicular joint. The recess should be distinguished from a tear of the plantar components of the spring ligament.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21512083     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  4 in total

Review 1.  Pearls and pitfalls of fluoroscopic-guided foot and ankle injections: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Barry G Hansford; Megan K Mills; Christopher J Hanrahan; Corrie M Yablon
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Plantar talar head contusions and osteochondral fractures: associated findings on ankle MRI and proposed mechanism of injury.

Authors:  Tetyana Gorbachova; Peter S Wang; Bing Hu; Jay C Horrow
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Imaging of sports-related midfoot and forefoot injuries.

Authors:  Alissa J Burge; Stephanie L Gold; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Anatomical variants of the medioplantar oblique ligament and inferoplantar longitudinal ligament: an MRI study.

Authors:  Paweł Szaro; Khaldun Ghali Gataa; Bogdan Ciszek
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 1.246

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.