Literature DB >> 21511970

Need for ethics support in healthcare institutions: views of Dutch board members and ethics support staff.

Linda Dauwerse1, Tineke Abma, Bert Molewijk, Guy Widdershoven.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to investigate the need for ethics support in Dutch healthcare institutions in order to understand why ethics support is often not used in practice and which factors are relevant in this context.
METHODS: This study had a mixed methods design integrating quantitative and qualitative research methods. Two survey questionnaires, two focus groups and 17 interviews were conducted among board members and ethics support staff in Dutch healthcare institutions.
FINDINGS: Most respondents see a need for ethics support. This need is related to the complexity of contemporary healthcare, the contribution of ethics support to the core business of the organisation and to the surplus value of paying structural attention to ethical issues. The need for ethics support is, however, not unconditional. Reasons for a lacking need include: aversion of innovations, negative associations with the notion of ethics support service, and organisational factors like resources and setting.
CONCLUSION: There is a conditioned need for ethics support in Dutch healthcare institutions. The promotion of ethics support in healthcare can be fostered by focusing on formats which fit the needs of (practitioners in) healthcare institutions. The emphasis should be on creating a (culture of) dialogue about the complex situations which emerge daily in contemporary healthcare practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21511970     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.040626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  10 in total

1.  Learning by doing. Training health care professionals to become facilitator of moral case deliberation.

Authors:  Margreet Stolper; Bert Molewijk; Guy Widdershoven
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2015-03

2.  Patient participation in Dutch ethics support: practice, ideals, challenges and recommendations-a national survey.

Authors:  Marleen Eijkholt; Janine de Snoo-Trimp; Wieke Ligtenberg; Bert Molewijk
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.834

3.  Goals of clinical ethics support: perceptions of Dutch healthcare institutions.

Authors:  L Dauwerse; T A Abma; B Molewijk; G Widdershoven
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2013-12

4.  Outcomes of moral case deliberation--the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD).

Authors:  Mia Svantesson; Jan Karlsson; Pierre Boitte; Jan Schildman; Linda Dauwerse; Guy Widdershoven; Reidar Pedersen; Martijn Huisman; Bert Molewijk
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 5.  Clinical Ethics Support for Healthcare Personnel: An Integrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Dara Rasoal; Kirsti Skovdahl; Mervyn Gifford; Annica Kihlgren
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-12

6.  'You can give them wings to fly': a qualitative study on values-based leadership in health care.

Authors:  Yvonne Denier; Lieve Dhaene; Chris Gastmans
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals' priorities.

Authors:  Mia Svantesson; Janine C de Snoo-Trimp; Göril Ursin; Henrica Cw de Vet; Berit S Brinchmann; Bert Molewijk
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Evaluation of moral case deliberation at the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate: a pilot study.

Authors:  Wike Seekles; Guy Widdershoven; Paul Robben; Gonny van Dalfsen; Bert Molewijk
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation.

Authors:  Margreet Stolper; Bert Molewijk; Guy Widdershoven
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Relational autonomy in the care of the vulnerable: health care professionals' reasoning in Moral Case Deliberation (MCD).

Authors:  Kaja Heidenreich; Anders Bremer; Lars Johan Materstvedt; Ulf Tidefelt; Mia Svantesson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.