Literature DB >> 21511820

Frequency of errors and pathology in panoramic images of young orthodontic patients.

Christina M Granlund1, Agneta Lith, Björn Molander, Kerstin Gröndahl, Ken Hansen, Annika Ekestubbe.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of errors in panoramic radiographs in young orthodontic patients, to register pathologic and abnormal conditions, and to compare these findings with the patient's record. A total of 1287 panoramic radiographs of children and adolescents (530 boys and 757 girls; mean age 14.2 years) were analyzed. The radiographs were obtained of patients referred for orthodontic treatment during a 1 year period. Four observers evaluated the radiographs for 10 common errors, pathologies, and/or anomalies. Cohen's kappa was used for the calculations of inter- and intraobserver variability. Five of the errors were divided into clinically relevant or not clinically relevant errors, i.e. errors influencing diagnosis. Only those pathological findings with a possible influence on orthodontic treatment were compared with the patient's record. Of the 1287 radiographs, 96 per cent had errors. The number of errors in each image varied between 1 and 5, and in 24 per cent of these images, the errors could be of importance for clinical decision making. The most common error was that the tongue was not in contact with the hard palate. Pathologies or anomalies were found in 558 patients and a total of 1221 findings were recorded. Findings of possible relevance for orthodontic treatment were 63, and 12 of those were registered in the patient records. Pathological findings outside the dental arches were low and could be an argument for minimizing the radiation field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21511820     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  8 in total

1.  A Secondary Analysis of Panoramic Radiographs Reveals Hotspots in the Maxillofacial Region Associated with Diabetes.

Authors:  Gary D Pack; Mark Craven; Amit Acharya
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2020-05-30

2.  Study of the frequency and location of incidental findings of the maxillofacial region in different fields of view in CBCT scans.

Authors:  Ivna A Lopes; Rosana M A Tucunduva; Roberta H Handem; Ana Lucia A Capelozza
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Mapping of a multilayer panoramic radiography device.

Authors:  Luciano Augusto Cano Martins; Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Matheus L Oliveira; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 4.  Common positioning errors in panoramic radiography: A review.

Authors:  Rafael Henrique Nunes Rondon; Yamba Carla Lara Pereira; Glauce Crivelaro do Nascimento
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-03-19

5.  Common errors in digital panoramic radiographs of patients with mixed dentition and patients with permanent dentition.

Authors:  Benjamin Peretz; Maya Gotler; Israel Kaffe
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-02-08

6.  Effectiveness of 2D radiographs in detecting CBCT-based incidental findings in orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Song Hee Oh; Seong-Hun Kim; Hyo-Won Ahn; Yoon-Goo Kang; Yong-Suk Choi; Yoon-Ah Kook; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A reject analysis of cone-beam CTs in under-aged patients.

Authors:  Jakob W G Van Acker; Wolfgang Jacquet; Melissa Dierens; Luc C Martens
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  The frequency and nature of incidental findings in large-field cone beam computed tomography scans of an orthodontic sample.

Authors:  Ryan Edwards; Noura Alsufyani; Giseon Heo; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.750

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.