Literature DB >> 21509714

Control in the middle (CIM) for three-period crossover studies.

Jonathan Shuster1, Stephen D Anton, Douglas Theriaque, Saunjoo Yoon.   

Abstract

Three-period crossover studies can be efficient and convenient methods of conducting Phase II clinical trials. Non-randomly placing control in the middle (CIM) has not been practiced but may be extremely useful in studies testing herbal products for which placebos are not available, or for distinguishing between behavioral and biological effects. Furthermore, this design can serve as a valuable addition to classical studies of either (a) two competing treatments or (b) treatment versus placebo versus an open label "nothing" as the control. Therefore, we propose rigorous designs that will help practitioners efficiently answer research questions where (1) two active treatments need to be compared against each other with treatment vs. placebo comparisons being of secondary importance; (2) a single active treatment needs to be tested where no placebo is available; or (3) the placebo effect is of interest in a treatment vs. placebo trial. For studies where no placebo is available, deception will be required, with participants told that in one randomly selected period (#1 or #3) they will receive the active treatment, and that they will receive a new experimental inert placebo in the other period. Assuming this design is approved by an ethics committee, it can be very useful in biomedical research. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21509714      PMCID: PMC3296130          DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1271044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta Med        ISSN: 0032-0943            Impact factor:   3.352


  8 in total

1.  Effect of crocetin from Gardenia jasminoides Ellis on sleep: a pilot study.

Authors:  H Kuratsune; N Umigai; R Takeno; Y Kajimoto; T Nakano
Journal:  Phytomedicine       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.340

2.  Diagnostics for assumptions in moderate to large simple clinical trials: do they really help?

Authors:  Jonathan J Shuster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Statistical methods for two-sequence three-period cross-over designs with incomplete data.

Authors:  S C Chow; J Shao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Review of nonparametric methods for the analysis of crossover studies.

Authors:  G Tudor; G G Koch
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  The functional neuroanatomy of the placebo effect.

Authors:  Helen S Mayberg; J Arturo Silva; Steven K Brannan; Janet L Tekell; Roderick K Mahurin; Scott McGinnis; Paul A Jerabek
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Sham device v inert pill: randomised controlled trial of two placebo treatments.

Authors:  Ted J Kaptchuk; William B Stason; Roger B Davis; Anna R T Legedza; Rosa N Schnyer; Catherine E Kerr; David A Stone; Bong Hyun Nam; Irving Kirsch; Rose H Goldman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-01

7.  Student t-tests for potentially abnormal data.

Authors:  Jonathan J Shuster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Pharmacodynamic interaction of warfarin with cranberry but not with garlic in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M I Mohammed Abdul; X Jiang; K M Williams; R O Day; B D Roufogalis; W S Liauw; H Xu; A J McLachlan
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 8.739

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.