Nikki B Zite1, Lorraine S Wallace. 1. From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Family Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether the Medicaid-Title XIX Sterilization Consent Form (SCF) format--"standard" compared with "low-literacy"--is associated with women's understanding of tubal sterilization. METHODS: This study was a randomized trial that took place in an obstetrics and gynecology residency clinic in the southeastern United States. Women, aged 21 to 45 years, were randomly allocated to receive a copy of either the standard or the low-literacy Medicaid-Title XIX SCF. A research assistant assessed women's sociodemographic characteristics, health-literacy skills, and understanding of sterilization using items from the Postpartum Tubal Sterilization Knowledge questionnaire. Women were also queried regarding their preferences for either version of the Medicaid-Title XIX SCF. RESULTS: We included 201 women in the study. Compared with women in the standard group (n=99), women in the low-literacy group (n=102) with no additional counseling better understood the length of time required between signing the form and undergoing sterilization (23.6% difference between groups, P<.01), the time interval until the form expired (33.7% difference between groups, P<.01), permanence of sterilization (15.7% difference between groups, P=.01), and that nonpermanent contraceptive options as effective as sterilization are available (8.2% difference between groups, P=.02). When given the choice to select either Medicaid-Title XIX SCF, 189 (94%) preferred the low-literacy version. CONCLUSION: Our results support replacing the standard Medicaid-Title XIX SCF with the low-literacy version to foster increased understanding of sterilization.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether the Medicaid-Title XIX Sterilization Consent Form (SCF) format--"standard" compared with "low-literacy"--is associated with women's understanding of tubal sterilization. METHODS: This study was a randomized trial that took place in an obstetrics and gynecology residency clinic in the southeastern United States. Women, aged 21 to 45 years, were randomly allocated to receive a copy of either the standard or the low-literacy Medicaid-Title XIX SCF. A research assistant assessed women's sociodemographic characteristics, health-literacy skills, and understanding of sterilization using items from the Postpartum Tubal Sterilization Knowledge questionnaire. Women were also queried regarding their preferences for either version of the Medicaid-Title XIX SCF. RESULTS: We included 201 women in the study. Compared with women in the standard group (n=99), women in the low-literacy group (n=102) with no additional counseling better understood the length of time required between signing the form and undergoing sterilization (23.6% difference between groups, P<.01), the time interval until the form expired (33.7% difference between groups, P<.01), permanence of sterilization (15.7% difference between groups, P=.01), and that nonpermanent contraceptive options as effective as sterilization are available (8.2% difference between groups, P=.02). When given the choice to select either Medicaid-Title XIX SCF, 189 (94%) preferred the low-literacy version. CONCLUSION: Our results support replacing the standard Medicaid-Title XIX SCF with the low-literacy version to foster increased understanding of sterilization.
Authors: Luke D Rothermel; Claire C Conley; Anuja L Sarode; Michael F Young; Zulema L Uscanga; McKenzie McIntyre; Jason B Fleming; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Kavita Shah Arora; Roselle Ponsaran; Laura Morello; Leila Katabi; Rosemary T Behmer Hansen; Nikki Zite; Kari White Journal: Contraception Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Lauren M Theiss; Tara Wood; Marshall C McLeod; Connie Shao; Isabel Dos Santos Marques; Swara Bajpai; Elizabeth Lopez; Anh M Duong; Robert Hollis; Melanie S Morris; Daniel I Chu Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2021-10-16 Impact factor: 3.125