Literature DB >> 21508264

A prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular lingual retainer survival.

Tülin Taner1, Muge Aksu.   

Abstract

Bonded retainers are considered reliable, independent of patient co-operation, and highly efficient. However, most studies regarding the survival of retainers are retrospective. The aims of this investigation were to prospectively evaluate the failure rate of bonded lingual retainers, the influence of direct or indirect bonding procedures on survival, and to determine the distribution of failures over a 6 month period. Mandibular lingual retainers were bonded in 66 patients. Thirty-two retainers were bonded using a direct method and 34 by an indirect method. There were 23 females and 9 males (mean age 15.96 ± 3.21 years) in the direct group and 29 females and 5 males (mean age 19.44 ± 6.79 years) in the indirect group. A 0.016 × 0.022 inch Bond-a-Braid retainer wire (eight-braided, flattened, stainless steel dead soft wire) was used with Transbond LR. Following bonding, the patients were observed monthly. A chi-square test was used to analyse the influence of the direct and indirect procedures on survival rate.Twenty-five retainers failed. The failure rate was 46.9 per cent with the direct method and 29.4 per cent with the indirect method. The difference between the methods was not statistically significant. The total failure rate was 37.9 per cent. The highest failure rate was seen in the first month. Seven patients had repeated failures. The failure rate was higher in the right quadrant. The total survival rate was 62.1 per cent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21508264     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  12 in total

1.  Factors influencing fixed retention practices in German-speaking Switzerland: A survey.

Authors:  Sina N Arnold; Nikolaos Pandis; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture.

Authors:  Netrporn Chinvipas; Yuh Hasegawa; Kazuto Terada
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Debate: short-term orthodontics.

Authors:  Anoop Maini; Rob Chate
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Restorative complications of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  A Alani; M Kelleher
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 5.  What causes failure of fixed orthodontic retention? - systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Authors:  Maciej Jedliński; Katarzyna Grocholewicz; Marta Mazur; Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Approaches of Turkish Dentists in Cases of Orthodontic Lingual Retainer Failures.

Authors:  Abdurahman Küçükönder; Ömer Hatipoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-09-28

7.  Side effects of twistflex retainers-3D evaluation of tooth movement after retainer debonding.

Authors:  Isabel Knaup; Jenny Rosa Bartz; Ulrike Schulze-Späte; Rogério Bastos Craveiro; Christian Kirschneck; Michael Wolf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainers in vitro.

Authors:  Dave Lie Sam Foek; Enver Yetkiner; Mutlu Ozcan
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 9.  In vivo orthodontic retainer survival - a review.

Authors:  Anca Victoria Labunet; Mîndra Badea
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 10.  The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dalya Al-Moghrabi; Nikolaos Pandis; Padhraig S Fleming
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.