BACKGROUND: The expression levels of LPL, ZAP70, TCL1A, CLLU1 and MCL1 have recently been proposed as prognostic factors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. However, few studies have systematically compared these different RNA-based markers. DESIGN AND METHODS: Using real-time quantitative PCR, we measured the mRNA expression levels of these genes in unsorted samples from 252 newly diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients and correlated our data with established prognostic markers (for example Binet stage, CD38, IGHV gene mutational status and genomic aberrations) and clinical outcome. RESULTS: High expression levels of all RNA-based markers, except MCL1, predicted shorter overall survival and time to treatment, with LPL being the most significant. In multivariate analysis including the RNA-based markers, LPL expression was the only independent prognostic marker for overall survival and time to treatment. When studying LPL expression and the established markers, LPL expression retained its independent prognostic strength for overall survival. All of the RNA-based markers, albeit with varying ability, added prognostic information to established markers, with LPL expression giving the most significant results. Notably, high LPL expression predicted a worse outcome in good-prognosis subgroups, such as patients with mutated IGHV genes, Binet stage A, CD38 negativity or favorable cytogenetics. In particular, the combination of LPL expression and CD38 could further stratify Binet stage A patients. CONCLUSIONS: LPL expression is the strongest RNA-based prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia that could potentially be applied to predict outcome in the clinical setting, particularly in the large group of patients with favorable prognosis.
BACKGROUND: The expression levels of LPL, ZAP70, TCL1A, CLLU1 and MCL1 have recently been proposed as prognostic factors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. However, few studies have systematically compared these different RNA-based markers. DESIGN AND METHODS: Using real-time quantitative PCR, we measured the mRNA expression levels of these genes in unsorted samples from 252 newly diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukemiapatients and correlated our data with established prognostic markers (for example Binet stage, CD38, IGHV gene mutational status and genomic aberrations) and clinical outcome. RESULTS: High expression levels of all RNA-based markers, except MCL1, predicted shorter overall survival and time to treatment, with LPL being the most significant. In multivariate analysis including the RNA-based markers, LPL expression was the only independent prognostic marker for overall survival and time to treatment. When studying LPL expression and the established markers, LPL expression retained its independent prognostic strength for overall survival. All of the RNA-based markers, albeit with varying ability, added prognostic information to established markers, with LPL expression giving the most significant results. Notably, high LPL expression predicted a worse outcome in good-prognosis subgroups, such as patients with mutated IGHV genes, Binet stage A, CD38 negativity or favorable cytogenetics. In particular, the combination of LPL expression and CD38 could further stratify Binet stage A patients. CONCLUSIONS:LPL expression is the strongest RNA-based prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia that could potentially be applied to predict outcome in the clinical setting, particularly in the large group of patients with favorable prognosis.
Authors: Chris Pepper; Thet Thet Lin; Guy Pratt; Saman Hewamana; Paul Brennan; Louise Hiller; Robert Hills; Rachel Ward; Jane Starczynski; Belinda Austen; Laura Hooper; Tatjana Stankovic; Chris Fegan Journal: Blood Date: 2008-07-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: H Döhner; S Stilgenbauer; A Benner; E Leupolt; A Kröber; L Bullinger; K Döhner; M Bentz; P Lichter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-12-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marco Herling; Kaushali A Patel; Nicole Weit; Nils Lilienthal; Michael Hallek; Michael J Keating; Dan Jones Journal: Blood Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: M C Müller; N C P Cross; P Erben; T Schenk; B Hanfstein; T Ernst; R Hehlmann; S Branford; G Saglio; A Hochhaus Journal: Leukemia Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Sujata Bhoi; Panagiotis Baliakas; Diego Cortese; Mattias Mattsson; Marie Engvall; Karin E Smedby; Gunnar Juliusson; Lesley-Ann Sutton; Larry Mansouri Journal: Haematologica Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Nousheen Zaidi; Leslie Lupien; Nancy B Kuemmerle; William B Kinlaw; Johannes V Swinnen; Karine Smans Journal: Prog Lipid Res Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 16.195
Authors: Uri Rozovski; Srdana Grgurevic; Carlos Bueso-Ramos; David M Harris; Ping Li; Zhiming Liu; Ji Yuan Wu; Preetesh Jain; William Wierda; Jan Burger; Susan O'Brien; Nitin Jain; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Michael J Keating; Zeev Estrov Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Zoltán Mátrai; Hajnalka Andrikovics; Anikó Szilvási; András Bors; András Kozma; Emma Ádám; Gabriella Halm; Éva Karászi; Attila Tordai; Tamás Masszi Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 3.201