BACKGROUND: A variety of surrogate markers for genetic features and outcome have been described in chronic lymphocytic leukemia based on gene expression analyses. Previous studies mostly focused on individual markers and selected disease characteristics, which makes it difficult to estimate the relative value of the novel markers. Therefore, in the present study a comprehensive approach was chosen investigating 18 promising, partly novel expression markers in a well characterized cohort of patients with long clinical follow-up and full genetic information (IGHV status, genomic abnormalities). DESIGN AND METHODS: Expression markers were evaluated using real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in CD19(+)-purified samples from 151 patients. Multivariate analyses were performed to test the markers' ability to identify patients at genetic risk and as prognostic markers in the context of established prognostic factors. RESULTS: For individual markers, ZAP70 expression provided the highest rate (81%) of correct assignment of patients at genetic risk (IGHV unmutated, V3-21 usage, 11q- or 17p-), followed by LPL and TCF7 (76% both). The assignment rate was improved to 88% by information from a four-gene combination (ZAP70, TCF7, DMD, ATM). In multivariate analysis of treatment-free survival, IGHV mutation status and expression of ADAM29 were of independent prognostic value besides disease stage. With regards to overall survival, expression of ATM, ADAM29, TCL1, and SEPT10 provided prognostic information in addition to that derived from clinical and genetic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression markers are suitable for screening but not as surrogates for the information from genetic risk factors. While many individual markers may be associated with outcome, only a few are of independent prognostic significance. With regard to prognosis estimation, the genetic prognostic factors cannot be replaced by the expression markers.
BACKGROUND: A variety of surrogate markers for genetic features and outcome have been described in chronic lymphocytic leukemia based on gene expression analyses. Previous studies mostly focused on individual markers and selected disease characteristics, which makes it difficult to estimate the relative value of the novel markers. Therefore, in the present study a comprehensive approach was chosen investigating 18 promising, partly novel expression markers in a well characterized cohort of patients with long clinical follow-up and full genetic information (IGHV status, genomic abnormalities). DESIGN AND METHODS: Expression markers were evaluated using real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in CD19(+)-purified samples from 151 patients. Multivariate analyses were performed to test the markers' ability to identify patients at genetic risk and as prognostic markers in the context of established prognostic factors. RESULTS: For individual markers, ZAP70 expression provided the highest rate (81%) of correct assignment of patients at genetic risk (IGHV unmutated, V3-21 usage, 11q- or 17p-), followed by LPL and TCF7 (76% both). The assignment rate was improved to 88% by information from a four-gene combination (ZAP70, TCF7, DMD, ATM). In multivariate analysis of treatment-free survival, IGHV mutation status and expression of ADAM29 were of independent prognostic value besides disease stage. With regards to overall survival, expression of ATM, ADAM29, TCL1, and SEPT10 provided prognostic information in addition to that derived from clinical and genetic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression markers are suitable for screening but not as surrogates for the information from genetic risk factors. While many individual markers may be associated with outcome, only a few are of independent prognostic significance. With regard to prognosis estimation, the genetic prognostic factors cannot be replaced by the expression markers.
Authors: David G Oscier; Anne C Gardiner; Sarah J Mould; Sharron Glide; Zadie A Davis; Rachel E Ibbotson; Martin M Corcoran; Robert M Chapman; Peter W Thomas; J Adrian Copplestone; Jenny A Orchard; Terry J Hamblin Journal: Blood Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Alexander Kröber; Till Seiler; Axel Benner; Lars Bullinger; Elsbeth Brückle; Peter Lichter; Hartmut Döhner; Stephan Stilgenbauer Journal: Blood Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: D Benedetti; R Bomben; M Dal-Bo; D Marconi; A Zucchetto; M Degan; F Forconi; G Del-Poeta; G Gaidano; V Gattei Journal: Leukemia Date: 2007-07-26 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Tatjana Stankovic; Grant S Stewart; Christopher Fegan; Paul Biggs; James Last; Philip J Byrd; Russell D Keenan; Paul A H Moss; Alexander M R Taylor Journal: Blood Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Laura Z Rassenti; Sonia Jain; Michael J Keating; William G Wierda; Michael R Grever; John C Byrd; Neil E Kay; Jennifer R Brown; John G Gribben; Donna S Neuberg; Feng He; Andrew W Greaves; Kanti R Rai; Thomas J Kipps Journal: Blood Date: 2008-06-24 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: U Klein; Y Tu; G A Stolovitzky; M Mattioli; G Cattoretti; H Husson; A Freedman; G Inghirami; L Cro; L Baldini; A Neri; A Califano; R Dalla-Favera Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2001-12-03 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: H Döhner; S Stilgenbauer; A Benner; E Leupolt; A Kröber; L Bullinger; K Döhner; M Bentz; P Lichter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-12-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Roberta Bichi; Susan A Shinton; Eric S Martin; Anatoliy Koval; George A Calin; Rossano Cesari; Giandomenico Russo; Richard R Hardy; Carlo M Croce Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-05-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A Rosenwald; A A Alizadeh; G Widhopf; R Simon; R E Davis; X Yu; L Yang; O K Pickeral; L Z Rassenti; J Powell; D Botstein; J C Byrd; M R Grever; B D Cheson; N Chiorazzi; W H Wilson; T J Kipps; P O Brown; L M Staudt Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2001-12-03 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Birgit Kainz; Medhat Shehata; Martin Bilban; Dirk Kienle; Daniel Heintel; Elisabeth Krömer-Holzinger; Trang Le; Alexander Kröber; Gerwin Heller; Ilse Schwarzinger; Dita Demirtas; Andreas Chott; Hartmut Döhner; Sabine Zöchbauer-Müller; Christa Fonatsch; Christoph Zielinski; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Alexander Gaiger; Oswald Wagner; Ulrich Jäger Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Mohd Arifin Kaderi; Meena Kanduri; Anne Mette Buhl; Marie Sevov; Nicola Cahill; Rebeqa Gunnarsson; Mattias Jansson; Karin Ekström Smedby; Henrik Hjalgrim; Jesper Jurlander; Gunnar Juliusson; Larry Mansouri; Richard Rosenquist Journal: Haematologica Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 9.941