BACKGROUND: Hepatic arterial therapy (HAT) has been proven to be effective at palliation of hormonal symptoms of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), as well as a means of cytoreduction. Recently, the newer modalities of yttrium-90 and drug-eluting beads with doxorubicin (DEBDOX) have been reported to be effective in the treatment of metastatic NETs. The aim of this study was to compare the safety, efficacy, and cost of selective internal radiation with DEB therapy. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, multicenter, multinational prospective treatment registry to investigate the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 and doxorubicin microspheres was reviewed. RESULTS: In all, 43 patients underwent a combined 69 HAT treatments, with 15 patients receiving 23 yttrium-90 treatments and 28 patients receiving 46 DEBDOX treatments. The extent of disease-based on the number of lesions, bilobar distribution, patient performance status, and size of largest lesion-was similar in both the yttrium-90 and DEBDOX groups. After a median follow-up of 12 months, response rates were similar with the two treatments, but then there was a significantly lower response rate in the yttrium-90 group at 12 months than in the DEBDOX group. In an evaluation of cost for the two treatments, the median cost for yttrium-90 was $25,243 and the median cost for DEBDOX was $13,400. CONCLUSION: HAT is a safe and effective therapy in patients with unresectable NETs to the liver. The size of the lesions, total lesion volume, and expense of therapy need to be considered when choosing which HAT method is optimal.
BACKGROUND: Hepatic arterial therapy (HAT) has been proven to be effective at palliation of hormonal symptoms of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), as well as a means of cytoreduction. Recently, the newer modalities of yttrium-90 and drug-eluting beads with doxorubicin (DEBDOX) have been reported to be effective in the treatment of metastatic NETs. The aim of this study was to compare the safety, efficacy, and cost of selective internal radiation with DEB therapy. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, multicenter, multinational prospective treatment registry to investigate the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 and doxorubicin microspheres was reviewed. RESULTS: In all, 43 patients underwent a combined 69 HAT treatments, with 15 patients receiving 23 yttrium-90 treatments and 28 patients receiving 46 DEBDOX treatments. The extent of disease-based on the number of lesions, bilobar distribution, patient performance status, and size of largest lesion-was similar in both the yttrium-90 and DEBDOX groups. After a median follow-up of 12 months, response rates were similar with the two treatments, but then there was a significantly lower response rate in the yttrium-90 group at 12 months than in the DEBDOX group. In an evaluation of cost for the two treatments, the median cost for yttrium-90 was $25,243 and the median cost for DEBDOX was $13,400. CONCLUSION: HAT is a safe and effective therapy in patients with unresectable NETs to the liver. The size of the lesions, total lesion volume, and expense of therapy need to be considered when choosing which HAT method is optimal.
Authors: K T Brown; B Y Koh; L A Brody; G I Getrajdman; J Susman; Y Fong; L H Blumgart Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Susan C Pitt; Jaime Knuth; James M Keily; John C McDermott; Sharon M Weber; Hebert Chen; William S Rilling; Edward J Quebbeman; David M Agarwal; Henry A Pitt Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-08-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Thomas K Rhee; Robert J Lewandowski; David M Liu; Mary F Mulcahy; Gary Takahashi; Paul D Hansen; Al B Benson; Andrew S Kennedy; Reed A Omary; Riad Salem Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Andrew S Kennedy; William A Dezarn; Patrick McNeillie; Doug Coldwell; Charles Nutting; Dennis Carter; Ravi Murthy; Steven Rose; Richard R P Warner; David Liu; Holger Palmedo; Carroll Overton; Bonita Jones; Riad Salem Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Jill K Onesti; Lawrence A Shirley; Neil D Saunders; Gail W Davidson; Mary E Dillhoff; Hooman Khabiri; Gregory E Guy; Joshua D Dowell; Carl R Schmidt; Manisha H Shah; Mark Bloomston Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Pippa H Newell; YingXing Wu; Helena Hoen; Richa Uppal; John Tyler Thiesing; Kevin Sasadeusz; Maria A Cassera; Ronald F Wolf; Paul Hansen; Chet W Hammill Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Eric S Engelman; Roberto Leon-Ferre; Boris G Naraev; Nancy Sharma; Shiliang Sun; Thomas M O'Dorisio; James Howe; Anna Button; Gideon Zamba; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson Journal: Pancreas Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.327