Literature DB >> 21507363

The relationship between attentional capture and deviations in movement trajectories in a selective reaching task.

Timothy N Welsh1.   

Abstract

According to action-centered models of attention, attention and action systems are tightly linked such that the capture of attention by an object automatically initiates response-producing processes. In support of this link, studies have shown that movements deviate towards or away from non-target stimuli. These deviations are thought to emerge because attentional capture by non-target stimuli generates responses that summate with target responses to develop a combined movement vector. The present study tested attention-action coupling by examining movement trajectories in the presence of non-target stimuli that do or do not capture attention. Previous research has revealed that non-target cue stimuli only capture attention when they share critical features with the target. Cues that do not share this feature do not capture attention. Following these studies and their findings, participants in the present study aimed to the location of a single white square (onset singleton target) or a single red square presented with two white squares (color singleton target). In separate blocks, targets were preceded by non-predictive cues that did or did not share the target feature (color or onset singleton cues). The critical finding of the present study was that trajectory effects mirrored the temporal interference effects in that deviations were only observed when cue and target properties matched. Deviations were not observed when the cue and target properties did not match. These data provide clear support for the link between attentional capture and the activation of response-producing processes.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21507363     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  12 in total

1.  The processing of visual and auditory information for reaching movements.

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Timothy N Welsh; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-08

2.  Trajectory deviations in spatial compatibility tasks with peripheral and central stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Sandra M Pacione; Heather F Neyedli; Matthew Ray; Jerry Ou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-10

3.  Computer mouse tracking reveals motor signatures in a cognitive task of spatial language grounding.

Authors:  Jonas Lins; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Dissociable effects of salience on attention and goal-directed action.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Brian A Anderson; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Outsider interference: no role for motor lateralization in determining the strength of avoidance responses during reaching.

Authors:  Rudmer Menger; Stefan Van der Stigchel; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Decision-making in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  The effect of similarity: non-spatial features modulate obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Rudmer Menger; H Chris Dijkerman; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  It is the flash which appears, the movement will follow: Investigating the relation between spatial attention and obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Rudmer Menger; H Chris Dijkerman; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

9.  Distractor interference during a choice limb reaching task.

Authors:  Matthew Ray; Daniel Weeks; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Trait self-control does not predict attentional control: Evidence from a novel attention capture paradigm.

Authors:  Michael A Dieciuc; Heather M Maranges; Walter R Boot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.