| Literature DB >> 21506132 |
Frank McCaughan1, Christodoulos P Pipinikas, Sam M Janes, P Jeremy George, Pamela H Rabbitts, Paul H Dear.
Abstract
The term 'field cancerization' is used to describe an epithelial surface that has a propensity to develop cancerous lesions, and in the case of the aerodigestive tract this is often as a result of chronic exposure to carcinogens in cigarette smoke 1, 2. The clinical endpoint is the development of multiple tumours, either simultaneously or sequentially in the same epithelial surface. The mechanisms underlying this process remain unclear; one possible explanation is that the epithelium is colonized by a clonal population of cells that are at increased risk of progression to cancer. We now address this possibility in a short case series, using individual genomic events as molecular biomarkers of clonality. In squamous lung cancer the most common genomic aberration is 3q amplification. We use a digital PCR technique to assess the clonal relationships between multiple biopsies in a longitudinal bronchoscopic study, using amplicon boundaries as markers of clonality. We demonstrate that clonality can readily be defined by these analyses and confirm that field cancerization occurs at a pre-invasive stage and that pre-invasive lesions and subsequent cancers are clonally related. We show that while the amplicon boundaries can be shared between different biopsies, the degree of 3q amplification and the internal structure of the 3q amplicon varies from lesion to lesion. Finally, in this small cohort, the degree of 3q amplification corresponds to clinical progression.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21506132 PMCID: PMC3378694 DOI: 10.1002/path.2887
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pathol ISSN: 0022-3417 Impact factor: 7.996
Figure 1Patient 002—clinical progression is associated with progressive and clonal changes in amplicon structure. (a) Patient 002 had multiple surveillance bronchoscopies over a 21 month period. Comparative µMCC analysis of three lesions was performed, one (HG 14) taken at a bronchoscopy at month 0, another at month 8 (HG1) and the final biopsy (CA1) at month 21. The upper lobe lesion (green) regressed. The lower lobe lesion (blue) progressed to cancer after 13 months (black). Some of the data from HG1 and CA1 have been presented previously 14#. (b) The amplicon differed in structure between the three lesions. µMCC results from the three lesions were compared. There was more pronounced 3q amplification in HG1 that progressed compared to HG14 that did not, and a further increase in 3q amplification in the subsequent cancer CA1. The µMCC profiles suggested that all three lesions shared a centromeric amplicon boundary. (c) Ultra-high resolution µMCC of the transition region was performed. The amplicon boundary was resolved to within a full-length L1 repeat element (locus 168, 475, 750–168, 481, 748) by the use of amplimers that straddled the start and end of the L1 (c, insert). This change in copy number was not present in DNA extracted from lung tissue adjacent to the resected cancer (red) (c). The results were normalized to the mean of the reference loci results for (a) and (b), and to the average of the pre-amplicon markers in (c)
Figure 2Patient 017—clinical progression is associated with progressive and clonal changes in amplicon structure (a) Comparison of sequential bronchial biopsies from patient 017, who underwent a left upper lobectomy (dashed bar) for squamous cell carcinoma prior to entering the study. He was subsequently found to have high-grade dysplasia in the resection margin and had a number of surveillance bronchoscopies. Although there was no biopsy-proven evidence of invasion, there was a clinical suspicion of cancer, so he proceeded to a pneumonectomy (solid bar) at month 15. The pneumonectomy specimen confirmed high-grade pre-invasive disease with no focal invasion. Subsequent biopsies at 17 and 34 months demonstrated extensive involvement of the trachea and two foci of invasion were diagnosed, including one at the pneumonectomy stump. Local photodynamic therapy was undertaken but the patient died of complications after the procedure. Three biopsies were analysed. (b) µMCC results for chromosome 3 are shown for all three biopsies and demonstrate regional amplification between 178 and 185 Mb. Using the low-resolution markers there is an increase in 3q amplification of the later lesions (HG5 and CA2) compared to HG11, confirmed on higher resolution junction analysis as shown in (c). Data from HG5 has been published previously 14#. (c, d) Iterative µMCC experiments were performed to define the centromeric and telomeric amplicon boundaries for each biopsy, using DNA derived from peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) of the same individual as a control. There was a common telomeric boundary for all three biopsies to a resolution of 1416 bps in the interval 185, 077, 260–185, 078, 676 within introns 1–2 of the gene PARL. The centromeric boundary again lay within an L1 element for the two later lesions. HG11 did not share the centromeric boundary; with similar copy pre- and post- the L1 repeat element, however, there was evidence of an adjacent amplicon boundary