OBJECTIVE: We compared the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and (99 m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy (BS) for the detection of bone metastasis in osteosarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 206 patients with stage II-IV osteosarcoma treated with surgery and chemotherapy as well as at least one paired PET/CT and BS scan (defined as an examination). PET/CT and BS images were interpreted separately. When analyzing the diagnostic yield of a combination of PET/CT and BS (PET/CT+BS), an examination was considered positive if either PET/CT or BS scored positive. The final diagnosis was obtained from histological findings or clinical follow-up with imaging studies for at least 6 months. Diagnostic performances of PET/CT, BS, and their combinations were calculated. RESULTS: Out of 833 examinations in 206 patients, 55 with 101 lesions in 38 patients were confirmed as bone metastases. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 95, 98, and 98%, respectively, for PET/CT; 76, 97, and 96%, respectively, for BS; and 100, 96, and 97%, respectively, for PET/CT+BS in an examination-based analysis. Lesion-based analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity of PET/CT+BS (100%) was significantly higher than that of PET/CT (92%) or BS (74%) alone. BS detected significantly less bone metastases in the growth plate region than outside the growth plate region (22 vs. 77%). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT is more sensitive and accurate than BS for diagnosing bone metastases in osteosarcoma. The combined use of PET/CT and BS improves sensitivity.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and (99 m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy (BS) for the detection of bone metastasis in osteosarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 206 patients with stage II-IV osteosarcoma treated with surgery and chemotherapy as well as at least one paired PET/CT and BS scan (defined as an examination). PET/CT and BS images were interpreted separately. When analyzing the diagnostic yield of a combination of PET/CT and BS (PET/CT+BS), an examination was considered positive if either PET/CT or BS scored positive. The final diagnosis was obtained from histological findings or clinical follow-up with imaging studies for at least 6 months. Diagnostic performances of PET/CT, BS, and their combinations were calculated. RESULTS: Out of 833 examinations in 206 patients, 55 with 101 lesions in 38 patients were confirmed as bone metastases. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 95, 98, and 98%, respectively, for PET/CT; 76, 97, and 96%, respectively, for BS; and 100, 96, and 97%, respectively, for PET/CT+BS in an examination-based analysis. Lesion-based analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity of PET/CT+BS (100%) was significantly higher than that of PET/CT (92%) or BS (74%) alone. BS detected significantly less bone metastases in the growth plate region than outside the growth plate region (22 vs. 77%). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT is more sensitive and accurate than BS for diagnosing bone metastases in osteosarcoma. The combined use of PET/CT and BS improves sensitivity.
Authors: James S Meyer; Helen R Nadel; Neyssa Marina; Richard B Womer; Kenneth L B Brown; J F Eary; Richard Gorlick; Holcombe E Grier; R Lor Randall; Elizabeth R Lawlor; Stephen L Lessnick; Paula J Schomberg; Mark D Kailo Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Gi Jeong Cheon; Min Suk Kim; Jun Ah Lee; Soo-Yong Lee; Wan Hyeong Cho; Won Seok Song; Jae-Soo Koh; Ji Young Yoo; Dong Hyun Oh; Duk Seop Shin; Dae-Geun Jeon Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Thomas Pfluger; Henriette I Melzer; Wolfgang P Mueller; Eva Coppenrath; Peter Bartenstein; Michael H Albert; Irene Schmid Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Laura E Selmic; Lynn R Griffin; Megan H Rector; Mary Lafferty; Roy Pool; Nicole P Ehrhart Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.008
Authors: Caitlin Hurley; M Beth McCarville; Barry L Shulkin; Shenghua Mao; Jianrong Wu; Fariba Navid; Najat C Daw; Alberto S Pappo; Michael W Bishop Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 3.167