Timothy B Hallett1. 1. Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK. timothy.hallett@imperial.ac.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the needs for information on the rate of new HIV infections (incidence) in epidemics and review developments in various methods for its estimation. RECENT FINDINGS: Epidemiological methods for estimating incidence with models using prevalence data have been useful, but the expansion of antiretroviral treatment programmes could now challenge their reliability. Laboratory-based HIV incidence assays that can be used to measure HIV incidence using a cross-sectional survey, provide a promising concept, but current technologies have not been sufficiently accurate. New statistical methods have been developed that show that if the properties of the assay are properly measured then unbiased estimates of incidence can be derived, and that assays meeting certain criteria can produce estimates of acceptable accuracy and precision. Encouragingly, some new assays and algorithms show signs of potentially meeting those criteria. Among the next challenges will be the systematic evaluation of assay performance in many different types of specimen and the validation of those methods through comparison with other measurements of incidence. SUMMARY: Recent developments in epidemiological and incidence assay-based methods of measuring incidence have been substantial and are likely to eventually lead to a revolution in the way that worldwide HIV epidemics are routinely tracked.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the needs for information on the rate of new HIV infections (incidence) in epidemics and review developments in various methods for its estimation. RECENT FINDINGS: Epidemiological methods for estimating incidence with models using prevalence data have been useful, but the expansion of antiretroviral treatment programmes could now challenge their reliability. Laboratory-based HIV incidence assays that can be used to measure HIV incidence using a cross-sectional survey, provide a promising concept, but current technologies have not been sufficiently accurate. New statistical methods have been developed that show that if the properties of the assay are properly measured then unbiased estimates of incidence can be derived, and that assays meeting certain criteria can produce estimates of acceptable accuracy and precision. Encouragingly, some new assays and algorithms show signs of potentially meeting those criteria. Among the next challenges will be the systematic evaluation of assay performance in many different types of specimen and the validation of those methods through comparison with other measurements of incidence. SUMMARY: Recent developments in epidemiological and incidence assay-based methods of measuring incidence have been substantial and are likely to eventually lead to a revolution in the way that worldwide HIV epidemics are routinely tracked.
Authors: Rebecca Guy; Judy Gold; Jesus M García Calleja; Andrea A Kim; Bharat Parekh; Michael Busch; Thomas Rehle; John Hargrove; Robert S Remis; John M Kaldor Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: G Kwesigabo; J Z Killewo; W Urassa; E Mbena; F Mhalu; J L Lugalla; C Godoy; G Biberfeld; M Emmelin; S Wall; A Sandstrom Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2000-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Etienne Karita; Matt Price; Eric Hunter; Elwyn Chomba; Susan Allen; Lin Fei; Anatoli Kamali; Eduard J Sanders; Omu Anzala; Michael Katende; Nzeera Ketter Journal: AIDS Date: 2007-02-19 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Neha S Shah; Yen T Duong; Linh-Vi Le; Nguyen Anh Tuan; Bharat S Parekh; Hoang Thi Thanh Ha; Quang Duy Pham; Cao Thi Thu Cuc; Trudy Dobbs; Tran Hong Tram; Truong Thi Xuan Lien; Nick Wagar; Chunfu Yang; Amy Martin; Mitchell Wolfe; Nguyen Tran Hien; Andrea A Kim Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Usha K Sharma; Marco Schito; Alex Welte; Christine Rousseau; Joseph Fitzgibbon; Brandon Keele; Stuart Shapiro; Andrew McMichael; David N Burns Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Sikhulile Moyo; Tessa LeCuyer; Rui Wang; Simani Gaseitsiwe; Jia Weng; Rosemary Musonda; Hermann Bussmann; Madisa Mine; Susan Engelbrecht; Joseph Makhema; Richard Marlink; Marianna K Baum; Vladimir Novitsky; M Essex Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 2.205