AIMS: The nuclear receptor liver X receptor-α (LXRα) stimulates lipogenesis, leading to steatosis. Nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) contributes to cellular defense mechanism by upregulating antioxidant genes, and may protect the liver from injury inflicted by fat accumulation. However, whether Nrf2 affects LXRα activity is unknown. This study investigated the inhibitory role of Nrf2 in hepatic LXRα activity and the molecular basis. RESULTS: A deficiency of Nrf2 enhanced the ability of LXRα agonist to promote hepatic steatosis, as mediated by lipogenic gene induction. In hepatocytes, Nrf2 overexpression repressed gene transactivation by LXR-binding site activation. Consistently, treatment of mice with sulforaphane (an Nrf2 activator) suppressed T0901317-induced lipogenesis, as confirmed by the experiments using hepatocytes. Nrf2 activation promoted deacetylation of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) by competing for p300, leading to FXR-dependent induction of small heterodimer partner (SHP), which was responsible for the repression of LXRα-dependent gene transcription. In human steatotic samples, the transcript levels of LXRα and SREBP-1 inversely correlated with those of Nrf2, FXR, and SHP. INNOVATION: Our findings offer the mechanism to explain how decrease in Nrf2 activity in hepatic steatosis could contribute to the progression of NAFLD, providing the use of Nrf2 as a molecular biomarker to diagnose NAFLD. As certain antioxidants have the abilities to activate Nrf2, clinicians might utilize the activators of Nrf2 as a new therapeutic approach to prevent and/or treat NAFLD. CONCLUSION: Nrf2 activation inhibits LXRα activity and LXRα-dependent liver steatosis by competing with FXR for p300, causing FXR activation and FXR-mediated SHP induction. Our findings provide important information on a strategy to prevent and/or treat steatosis.
AIMS: The nuclear receptor liver X receptor-α (LXRα) stimulates lipogenesis, leading to steatosis. Nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) contributes to cellular defense mechanism by upregulating antioxidant genes, and may protect the liver from injury inflicted by fat accumulation. However, whether Nrf2 affects LXRα activity is unknown. This study investigated the inhibitory role of Nrf2 in hepatic LXRα activity and the molecular basis. RESULTS: A deficiency of Nrf2 enhanced the ability of LXRα agonist to promote hepatic steatosis, as mediated by lipogenic gene induction. In hepatocytes, Nrf2 overexpression repressed gene transactivation by LXR-binding site activation. Consistently, treatment of mice with sulforaphane (an Nrf2 activator) suppressed T0901317-induced lipogenesis, as confirmed by the experiments using hepatocytes. Nrf2 activation promoted deacetylation of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) by competing for p300, leading to FXR-dependent induction of small heterodimer partner (SHP), which was responsible for the repression of LXRα-dependent gene transcription. In human steatotic samples, the transcript levels of LXRα and SREBP-1 inversely correlated with those of Nrf2, FXR, and SHP. INNOVATION: Our findings offer the mechanism to explain how decrease in Nrf2 activity in hepatic steatosis could contribute to the progression of NAFLD, providing the use of Nrf2 as a molecular biomarker to diagnose NAFLD. As certain antioxidants have the abilities to activate Nrf2, clinicians might utilize the activators of Nrf2 as a new therapeutic approach to prevent and/or treat NAFLD. CONCLUSION: Nrf2 activation inhibits LXRα activity and LXRα-dependent liver steatosis by competing with FXR for p300, causing FXR activation and FXR-mediated SHP induction. Our findings provide important information on a strategy to prevent and/or treat steatosis.
Authors: Jutta Lamlé; Silke Marhenke; Jürgen Borlak; Reinhard von Wasielewski; C J Peter Eriksson; Robert Geffers; Michael P Manns; Masayuki Yamamoto; Arndt Vogel Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-01-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: K Itoh; T Chiba; S Takahashi; T Ishii; K Igarashi; Y Katoh; T Oyake; N Hayashi; K Satoh; I Hatayama; M Yamamoto; Y Nabeshima Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1997-07-18 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Guoxun Chen; Guosheng Liang; Jiafu Ou; Joseph L Goldstein; Michael S Brown Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-07-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jonathan M Maher; Matthew Z Dieter; Lauren M Aleksunes; Angela L Slitt; Grace Guo; Yuji Tanaka; George L Scheffer; Jefferson Y Chan; Jose E Manautou; Ying Chen; Timothy P Dalton; Masayuki Yamamoto; Curtis D Klaassen Journal: Hepatology Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: H Nishigori; H Tomura; N Tonooka; M Kanamori; S Yamada; K Sho; I Inoue; N Kikuchi; K Onigata; I Kojima; T Kohama; K Yamagata; Q Yang; Y Matsuzawa; T Miki; S Seino; M Y Kim; H S Choi; Y K Lee; D D Moore; J Takeda Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-01-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Luis E Gomez-Quiroz; Daekwan Seo; Yun-Han Lee; Mitsuteru Kitade; Timo Gaiser; Matthew Gillen; Seung-Bum Lee; Ma Concepcion Gutierrez-Ruiz; Elizabeth A Conner; Valentina M Factor; Snorri S Thorgeirsson; Jens U Marquardt Journal: Toxicology Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Federico Salamone; Giovanni Li Volti; Lucilla Titta; Lidia Puzzo; Ignazio Barbagallo; Francesco La Delia; Shira Zelber-Sagi; Michele Malaguarnera; Pier Giuseppe Pelicci; Marco Giorgio; Fabio Galvano Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Vijay R More; Jialin Xu; Prajakta C Shimpi; Clyde Belgrave; James P Luyendyk; Masayuki Yamamoto; Angela L Slitt Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2013-03-16 Impact factor: 7.376