BACKGROUND: Exact lymph node (LN) staging is crucial for prognosis estimation and treatment stratification in gastric cancer. Recently, a new concept for improving LN harvest and the accuracy of LN staging was introduced. It combines methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection (MBLND) with a new ex vivo sentinel lymph node (evSLN) mapping technique. The purpose of this study was to investigate these techniques in a prospective and randomized manner. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with proven or suspicious gastric cancer were enrolled. Twenty-five patients each were randomized to the conventional technique (Unstained) or MBLND (Methylene). In 46 cases, additional evSLN mapping with black ink as a marker dye was performed. RESULTS:Methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection was associated with a highly significantly improved LN harvest (36 ± 10 vs. 21 ± 10; P < 0.001). The biggest differences were seen in LNs ≤ 6 mm. In contrast to the conventional technique, neither partial gastrectomy nor preoperative chemotherapy influenced LN harvest in the methylene group. The evSLN detection rate, sensitivity, and accuracy were 87, 81, and 93%, respectively. Isolated tumor cells were detected after immunohistochemical staining in 3 of 17 cases (18%). The probability of carrying a metastasis was two times higher in evSLNs compared to non-evSLNs (44 vs. 23%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection is a highly effective method of improving the LN harvest in gastric cancer. Further application of evSLN mapping is feasible and has the potential to heighten the sensitivity of metastasis detection.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Exact lymph node (LN) staging is crucial for prognosis estimation and treatment stratification in gastric cancer. Recently, a new concept for improving LN harvest and the accuracy of LN staging was introduced. It combines methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection (MBLND) with a new ex vivo sentinel lymph node (evSLN) mapping technique. The purpose of this study was to investigate these techniques in a prospective and randomized manner. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with proven or suspicious gastric cancer were enrolled. Twenty-five patients each were randomized to the conventional technique (Unstained) or MBLND (Methylene). In 46 cases, additional evSLN mapping with black ink as a marker dye was performed. RESULTS:Methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection was associated with a highly significantly improved LN harvest (36 ± 10 vs. 21 ± 10; P < 0.001). The biggest differences were seen in LNs ≤ 6 mm. In contrast to the conventional technique, neither partial gastrectomy nor preoperative chemotherapy influenced LN harvest in the methylene group. The evSLN detection rate, sensitivity, and accuracy were 87, 81, and 93%, respectively. Isolated tumor cells were detected after immunohistochemical staining in 3 of 17 cases (18%). The probability of carrying a metastasis was two times higher in evSLNs compared to non-evSLNs (44 vs. 23%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection is a highly effective method of improving the LN harvest in gastric cancer. Further application of evSLN mapping is feasible and has the potential to heighten the sensitivity of metastasis detection.