PURPOSE: Cardiorespiratory fitness is suggested to be an important marker of cardiovascular risk but is rarely evaluated in health care settings. In the present study, directly measured peak oxygen uptake (V·O 2peak) from a diverse population of 4637 healthy participants were used to develop and cross-validate a new nonexercise regression model of cardiorespiratory fitness for men and women. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multivariable regression analysis was used to develop a nonexercise model of cardiorespiratory fitness for men and women separately with V·O 2peak as the outcome. In the final models, 2067 men (mean age = 48.8 yr) and 2193 women (mean age = 47.9 yr) were included, respectively. Cross-validation of the models was done by standard data splitting procedures with evaluation of constant error and total error of a model developed on one sample and cross-validated on another sample. Age, waist circumference, leisure time physical activity, and resting HR, successively, were the most potent predictors of V·O 2peak for both men and women. Together, 61% and 56% of variance in V·O 2peak, for men and women, respectively, were explained by the full models. SEE was 5.70 and 5.14 for the models including men and women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The nonexercise regression model developed in the present study was fairly accurate in predicting V·O 2peak in this healthy population of men and women. The model might be generalized to other healthy populations and might be a valid tool for a rough assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness in an outpatient setting.
PURPOSE:Cardiorespiratory fitness is suggested to be an important marker of cardiovascular risk but is rarely evaluated in health care settings. In the present study, directly measured peak oxygen uptake (V·O 2peak) from a diverse population of 4637 healthy participants were used to develop and cross-validate a new nonexercise regression model of cardiorespiratory fitness for men and women. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multivariable regression analysis was used to develop a nonexercise model of cardiorespiratory fitness for men and women separately with V·O 2peak as the outcome. In the final models, 2067 men (mean age = 48.8 yr) and 2193 women (mean age = 47.9 yr) were included, respectively. Cross-validation of the models was done by standard data splitting procedures with evaluation of constant error and total error of a model developed on one sample and cross-validated on another sample. Age, waist circumference, leisure time physical activity, and resting HR, successively, were the most potent predictors of V·O 2peak for both men and women. Together, 61% and 56% of variance in V·O 2peak, for men and women, respectively, were explained by the full models. SEE was 5.70 and 5.14 for the models including men and women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The nonexercise regression model developed in the present study was fairly accurate in predicting V·O 2peak in this healthy population of men and women. The model might be generalized to other healthy populations and might be a valid tool for a rough assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness in an outpatient setting.
Authors: Lawrence C Johnson; Keli Parker; Brandon F Aguirre; Travis G Nemkov; Angelo D'Alessandro; Sarah A Johnson; Douglas R Seals; Christopher R Martens Journal: Geroscience Date: 2019-11-09 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Elizabeth A Boots; Stephanie A Schultz; Jennifer M Oh; Jordan Larson; Dorothy Edwards; Dane Cook; Rebecca L Koscik; Maritza N Dowling; Catherine L Gallagher; Cynthia M Carlsson; Howard A Rowley; Barbara B Bendlin; Asenath LaRue; Sanjay Asthana; Bruce P Hermann; Mark A Sager; Sterling C Johnson; Ozioma C Okonkwo Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Renske Meijer; Martijn van Hooff; Nicole E Papen-Botterhuis; Charlotte J L Molenaar; Marta Regis; Thomas Timmers; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Hans H C M Savelberg; Goof Schep Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2022-04-05
Authors: Angela S Koh; Fei Gao; Ru S Tan; Liang Zhong; Shuang Leng; Xiaodan Zhao; Kevin T Fridianto; Jianhong Ching; Si Y Lee; Bryan M H Keng; Tee Joo Yeo; Shu Y Tan; Hong C Tan; Chin T Lim; Woon-Puay Koh; Jean-Paul Kovalik Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Andrew S Jackson; Xuemei Sui; Daniel P O'Connor; Timothy S Church; Duck-chul Lee; Enrique G Artero; Steven N Blair Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Enrique G Artero; Andrew S Jackson; Xuemei Sui; Duck-Chul Lee; Daniel P O'Connor; Carl J Lavie; Timothy S Church; Steven N Blair Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Farshid Daneshvar; Michael Weinreich; Danial Daneshvar; Michael Sperling; Chadi Salmane; Harout Yacoub; James Gabriels; Thomas McGinn; Marianne C Smith Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2017-02
Authors: Jacob K Kariuki; Bethany B Gibbs; Kirk I Erickson; Andrea Kriska; Susan Sereika; David Ogutu; Heather Milton; La'Vette Wagner; Neel Rao; Ray Peralta; Jennifer Bobb; Adrian Bermudez; Sabina Hirshfield; Timothy Goetze; Lora E Burke Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Xuemei Sui; Virginia J Howard; Michelle N McDonnell; Linda Ernstsen; Matthew L Flaherty; Steven P Hooker; Carl J Lavie Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 7.616