Literature DB >> 33798731

The feasibility and acceptability of a web-based physical activity for the heart (PATH) intervention designed to reduce the risk of heart disease among inactive African Americans: Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Jacob K Kariuki1, Bethany B Gibbs2, Kirk I Erickson2, Andrea Kriska2, Susan Sereika2, David Ogutu3, Heather Milton4, La'Vette Wagner2, Neel Rao2, Ray Peralta4, Jennifer Bobb5, Adrian Bermudez2, Sabina Hirshfield6, Timothy Goetze7, Lora E Burke2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies have used the internet to promote physical activity (PA) in several settings, including the home environment, but few have been tailored for African Americans (AAs). To address this research gap, we conducted focus groups with AAs to inform the development of a web-based intervention, Physical Activity for The Heart (PATH), that leverages openly accessible platforms, such as YouTube, to promote PA in any setting.
PURPOSE: To describe the rationale and design of a pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT), that examines the feasibility and acceptability of the PATH intervention among 30 AA adults aged 40--70 years without history of cardiovascular disease.
METHODS: A 12-week, single-site, wait-listed RCT with subjects randomized 1:1 to either: 1) treatment group - participants receive the PATH intervention, including the online portal and twice a month phone calls from a PA coach, or 2) attention control group - participants receive a self-help PA handout and twice a month general health newsletter. All participants self-monitor step count using actigraphy. The primary outcomes of this 12-week, pilot RCT are recruitment, retention, and adherence to self-monitoring (Actigraph wear time) and the intervention protocol (PATH utilization). The secondary outcomes include changes in PA (step count, moderate-to-vigorous PA, exercise self-efficacy), and cardiometabolic risk (HbA1C, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, type 2 diabetes risk score, percent body fat, weight, and waist circumference) from baseline to 12 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide PATH intervention feasibility and acceptability data among inactive AA adults and will inform a future, full-scale RCT testing efficacy.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiometabolic risk; Physical activity; Physical activity tracker; Randomized controlled trial; Self-monitoring; Technology; Web-based

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33798731      PMCID: PMC8180502          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  35 in total

Review 1.  Promoting Physical Activity among Underserved Populations.

Authors:  Andrea S Mendoza-Vasconez; Sarah Linke; Mario Muñoz; Dori Pekmezi; Cole Ainsworth; Mayra Cano; Victoria Williams; Bess H Marcus; Britta A Larsen
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors.

Authors:  Jeffer E Sasaki; Dinesh John; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.319

3.  Pilot Trial of a Home-based Physical Activity Program for African American Women.

Authors:  Dori Pekmezi; Cole Ainsworth; Rodney P Joseph; Victoria Williams; Renee Desmond; Karen Meneses; Bess Marcus; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Internet-Based Physical Activity Interventions.

Authors:  Rodney P Joseph; Nefertiti H Durant; Tanya J Benitez; Dorothy W Pekmezi
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2014-01

Review 5.  Fundamental questions about genes, inactivity, and chronic diseases.

Authors:  Frank W Booth; Simon J Lees
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.107

6.  Development and validation of a patient self-assessment score for diabetes risk.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; Alison M Edwards; Andrew S Bomback; Christie M Ballantyne; David Brillon; Mark A Callahan; Steven M Teutsch; Alvin I Mushlin; Lisa M Kern
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Emotion assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  John M Salsman; Zeeshan Butt; Paul A Pilkonis; Jill M Cyranowski; Nicholas Zill; Hugh C Hendrie; Mary Jo Kupst; Morgen A R Kelly; Rita K Bode; Seung W Choi; Jin-Shei Lai; James W Griffith; Catherine M Stoney; Pim Brouwers; Sarah S Knox; David Cella
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Developing an intervention to address physical activity barriers for African-American women in the deep south (USA).

Authors:  Dori Pekmezi; Bess Marcus; Karen Meneses; Monica L Baskin; Jamy D Ard; Michelle Y Martin; Natasia Adams; Cody Robinson; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2013-05

9.  A Web-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Spanish-Speaking Latinas: A Costs and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Britta Larsen; Bess Marcus; Dori Pekmezi; Sheri Hartman; Todd Gilmer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Recommendations for a culturally relevant Internet-based tool to promote physical activity among overweight young African American women, Alabama, 2010-2011.

Authors:  Nefertiti H Durant; Rodney P Joseph; Andrea Cherrington; Yendelela Cuffee; BernNadette Knight; Dwight Lewis; Jeroan J Allison
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Personalization of Intervention Timing for Physical Activity: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Saurabh Chaudhari; Suparna Ghanvatkar; Atreyi Kankanhalli
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.947

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.