Literature DB >> 21502828

Long-term follow-up of patients after antegrade continence enema procedure.

Anees A Siddiqui1, Steven J Fishman, Stuart B Bauer, Samuel Nurko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antegrade continence enema (ACE) has become an important therapeutic modality in the treatment of intractable constipation and fecal incontinence. There are little data available on the long-term performance of the ACE procedure in children.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent the ACE procedure was conducted. Irrigation characteristics and complications were noted. Outcome was assessed for individual encounters based on frequency of bowel movements, incontinence, pain, and predictability.
RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients underwent an ACE. One hundred five patients had at least 6 months of follow-up, and were included in the analysis. Diagnoses included myelodysplasia (39%), functional intractable constipation (26%), anorectal malformations (21%), nonrelaxing internal anal sphincter (7%), cerebral palsy (3%), and other diagnoses (4%). The average follow-up was 68 months (range 7-178 months). At the last follow-up, 69% of patients had successful bowel management. Of the 31% of patients who did not have successful bowel management, 20% were using the ACE despite suboptimal results, 10% required surgical removal, and 2% were not using the ACE because of behavioral opposition to it. Patients were started on normal saline, but were switched to GoLYTELY (PEG-3350 and electrolyte solution) if there was an inadequate response (61% at final encounter). Additives were needed in 34% of patients. The average irrigation dose was 23 ± 0.7 mL/kg. The average toilet sitting time was 51.7 ± 3.5 minutes, with infusions running for 12.1 ± 1.2 minutes. Stomal complications occurred in 63% (infection, leakage, and stenosis) of patients, 33% required surgical revision and 6% eventually required diverting ostomies.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term use of the ACE gives successful results in 69% of patients, whereas 63% had a stoma-related complication and 33% required surgical revision of the stoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21502828      PMCID: PMC3877620          DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181ff6042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  29 in total

1.  Continent catheterizable channels and the timing of their complications.

Authors:  J C Thomas; M S Dietrich; L Trusler; R T DeMarco; J C Pope; J W Brock; M C Adams
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Control of fecal incontinence: continued success with the Malone procedure.

Authors:  S R Schell; G J Toogood; N E Dudley
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Colonic manometry as predictor of cecostomy success in children with defecation disorders.

Authors:  Maartje M van den Berg; Mark Hogan; Donna A Caniano; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Marc A Benninga; Hayat M Mousa
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  The antegrade continence enema successfully treats idiopathic slow-transit constipation.

Authors:  Sebastian K King; Jonathan R Sutcliffe; Bridget R Southwell; Peter G Chait; John M Hutson
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  The MACE procedure: experience in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  J I Curry; A Osborne; P S Malone
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Bowel management for fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal malformations.

Authors:  A Peña; K Guardino; J M Tovilla; M A Levitt; G Rodriguez; R Torres
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Continent appendicostomy in the bowel management of fecally incontinent children.

Authors:  M A Levitt; S Z Soffer; A Peña
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Percutaneous cecostomy: a new technique in the management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  B Shandling; P G Chait; H F Richards
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  MACE or caecostomy button for idiopathic constipation in children: a comparison of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  S Cascio; M E Flett; M De la Hunt; A M Barrett; B Jaffray
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Tap water irrigation and additives to optimize success with the Malone antegrade continence enema: the Indiana University algorithm.

Authors:  Ahmad H Bani-Hani; Mark P Cain; Shelly King; Richard C Rink
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Guy R Orangio; Massarat Zutshi; Suraj Alva; Tracy L Hull; Peter W Marcello; David A Margolin; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Malone Antegrade Continence Enemas vs. Cecostomy vs. Transanal Irrigation-What Is New and How Do We Counsel Our Patients?

Authors:  Maryellen S Kelly
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Understanding and treating refractory constipation.

Authors:  Gabrio Bassotti; Corrado Blandizzi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-05-06

4.  Gastrointestinal motility disorders in children.

Authors:  Lusine Ambartsumyan; Leonel Rodriguez
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-01

5.  Factors associated with successful decrease and discontinuation of antegrade continence enemas (ACE) in children with defecation disorders: a study evaluating the effect of ACE on colon motility.

Authors:  L Rodriguez; S Nurko; A Flores
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  Surgical Management of Idiopathic Constipation in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Lily S Cheng; Allan M Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2018-02-25

7.  Antegrade continence enema (ACE): predictors of outcome in 111 patients.

Authors:  S Basson; A Zani; S McDowell; E Athanasakos; S Cleeve; S Phelps; P Charlesworth
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  5 years after an ACE: what happens then?

Authors:  Clara Chong; Neil Featherstone; Shazia Sharif; Abraham Cherian; Peter Cuckow; Imran Mushtaq; Paolo De Coppi; Kate Cross; Joseph Curry
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Colonic transit time and pressure based on Bernoulli's principle.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Uno
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-05

10.  Unmet Needs in Pediatric Functional Constipation.

Authors:  Manu Sood; Peter Lichtlen; Maria Claudia Perez
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 1.168

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.