BACKGROUND: Morphology microcalcification descriptors help stratify the risk of breast malignancy. Micro CT is feasible for visualization of the fine-structure of tissues and may be suitible for high resolution microcalcification analysis. PURPOSE: To analyze the interior structure of microcalcifications using a micro CT imaging system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Core needle breast biopsy specimens from 16 women with clustered microcalcifications were examined with micro CT. The samples measured between 0.8 to 1.2 mm in diameter. Micro CT scans with an isotropic voxel size of 8.4 µm were obtained to generate two- and three-dimensional images of the microcalcifications. The number of microcalcifications were counted on the magnified specimen radiogram and on micro CT. Attenuation values of microcalcifications were measured by drawing a region of interest (ROI) in the center of the microcalcifications. Two blinded observers assessed the morphology and the interior structure of microcalcifications. RESULTS: Five patients had benign and 11 patients had malignant breast lesions. On micro CT, microcalcifications of benign tissue showed a coarse lamellar or trabecular interior structure, whereas microcalcifications of breast cancer tissue showed a more uniform granular interior structure. There was no correlation between attenuation values of benign compared with malignant microcalcifications. CONCLUSION: On micro CT, an interior structure of microcalcifications is detectable. Benign and malignant microcalcifications display different patterns of interior structure.
BACKGROUND: Morphology microcalcification descriptors help stratify the risk of breast malignancy. Micro CT is feasible for visualization of the fine-structure of tissues and may be suitible for high resolution microcalcification analysis. PURPOSE: To analyze the interior structure of microcalcifications using a micro CT imaging system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Core needle breast biopsy specimens from 16 women with clustered microcalcifications were examined with micro CT. The samples measured between 0.8 to 1.2 mm in diameter. Micro CT scans with an isotropic voxel size of 8.4 µm were obtained to generate two- and three-dimensional images of the microcalcifications. The number of microcalcifications were counted on the magnified specimen radiogram and on micro CT. Attenuation values of microcalcifications were measured by drawing a region of interest (ROI) in the center of the microcalcifications. Two blinded observers assessed the morphology and the interior structure of microcalcifications. RESULTS: Five patients had benign and 11 patients had malignant breast lesions. On micro CT, microcalcifications of benign tissue showed a coarse lamellar or trabecular interior structure, whereas microcalcifications of breast cancer tissue showed a more uniform granular interior structure. There was no correlation between attenuation values of benign compared with malignant microcalcifications. CONCLUSION: On micro CT, an interior structure of microcalcifications is detectable. Benign and malignant microcalcifications display different patterns of interior structure.
Authors: Muhammad U Ghani; Liqiang Ren; Molly Wong; Yuhua Li; Bin Zheng; Xiujiang John Rong; Kai Yang; Hong Liu Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Muhammad U Ghani; Zhongxing Zhou; Liqiang Ren; Yuhua Li; Bin Zheng; Kai Yang; Hong Liu Journal: Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 1.455
Authors: Rong Tang; Mansi Saksena; Suzanne B Coopey; Leopoldo Fernandez; Julliette M Buckley; Lan Lei; Owen Aftreth; Frederick Koerner; James Michaelson; Elizabeth Rafferty; Elena Brachtel; Barbara L Smith Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Inneke Willekens; Elke Van de Casteele; Nico Buls; Frederik Temmermans; Bart Jansen; Rudi Deklerck; Johan de Mey Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-01-06 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Kai Scherer; Eva Braig; Sebastian Ehn; Jonathan Schock; Johannes Wolf; Lorenz Birnbacher; Michael Chabior; Julia Herzen; Doris Mayr; Susanne Grandl; Anikó Sztrókay-Gaul; Karin Hellerhoff; Franz Pfeiffer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: S Pacilè; C Dullin; P Baran; M Tonutti; C Perske; U Fischer; J Albers; F Arfelli; D Dreossi; K Pavlov; A Maksimenko; S C Mayo; Y I Nesterets; S Tavakoli Taba; S Lewis; P C Brennan; T E Gureyev; G Tromba; S Wienbeck Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Redona Brahimetaj; Inneke Willekens; Annelien Massart; Ramses Forsyth; Jan Cornelis; Johan De Mey; Bart Jansen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Wafa M Sarraj; Rong Tang; Anas L Najjar; Molly Griffin; Anthony H Bui; Alan Zambeli-Ljepovic; Mike Senter-Zapata; Maya Lewin-Berlin; Leopoldo Fernandez; Juliette Buckley; Amy Ly; Elena Brachtel; Owen Aftreth; John Gilbertson; Yukako Yagi; Michele Gadd; Kevin S Hughes; Barbara L Smith; James S Michaelson Journal: J Pathol Inform Date: 2015-11-27