BACKGROUND: Nab-paclitaxel is a novel Cremophor®-free nanoparticle of albumin-stabilized paclitaxel, which has favorable efficacy and toxicity characteristics relative to other solvent-based taxanes, such as paclitaxel and docetaxel. METHODS: Eligible patients had platinum- and taxane-resistant ovarian cancer, defined by persistent or progressive disease following primary chemotherapy (n = 5) or recurrence within 6 months of treatment completion (n = 42). All patients had measurable disease, no prior therapy for recurrent disease and Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 2. Treatment was nab-paclitaxel, 100 mg/m² days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day schedule. The primary endpoint was Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.0 response rate, evaluated in a 2-stage design (with power of 0.90 for a RR of 25% and with alpha of 0.05 for RR of 10%). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were enrolled of which 47 were evaluable; median time from frontline therapy completion to registration was 21 days. Patient demographics include median age: 59 (34-78) years, serous histology: 72%, and high-grade: 81%. EFFICACY: one complete and 10 partial responses were confirmed (23%); 17 patients (36%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 4.5 months (95% CI: 2.2-6.7); overall survival was 17.4 months (95% CI: 13.2-20.8). Seventeen patients (36%) had PFS > 6 months. TOXICITY: there were no grade 4 events; grade 3 events were neutropenia (6), anemia (3), GI (2), metabolic (2), pain (2), and leukopenia (1); neurosensory toxicity was observed as grade 2:5, grade 3:1. CONCLUSIONS: Nab-paclitaxel has noteworthy single-agent activity and is tolerable in this cohort of refractory ovarian cancer patients previously treated with paclitaxel.
BACKGROUND:Nab-paclitaxel is a novel Cremophor®-free nanoparticle of albumin-stabilized paclitaxel, which has favorable efficacy and toxicity characteristics relative to other solvent-based taxanes, such as paclitaxel and docetaxel. METHODS: Eligible patients had platinum- and taxane-resistant ovarian cancer, defined by persistent or progressive disease following primary chemotherapy (n = 5) or recurrence within 6 months of treatment completion (n = 42). All patients had measurable disease, no prior therapy for recurrent disease and Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 2. Treatment was nab-paclitaxel, 100 mg/m² days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day schedule. The primary endpoint was Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.0 response rate, evaluated in a 2-stage design (with power of 0.90 for a RR of 25% and with alpha of 0.05 for RR of 10%). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were enrolled of which 47 were evaluable; median time from frontline therapy completion to registration was 21 days. Patient demographics include median age: 59 (34-78) years, serous histology: 72%, and high-grade: 81%. EFFICACY: one complete and 10 partial responses were confirmed (23%); 17 patients (36%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 4.5 months (95% CI: 2.2-6.7); overall survival was 17.4 months (95% CI: 13.2-20.8). Seventeen patients (36%) had PFS > 6 months. TOXICITY: there were no grade 4 events; grade 3 events were neutropenia (6), anemia (3), GI (2), metabolic (2), pain (2), and leukopenia (1); neurosensory toxicity was observed as grade 2:5, grade 3:1. CONCLUSIONS:Nab-paclitaxel has noteworthy single-agent activity and is tolerable in this cohort of refractory ovarian cancerpatients previously treated with paclitaxel.
Authors: Maurie Markman; James Hall; Daniel Spitz; Sheldon Weiner; Linda Carson; Linda Van Le; Mark Baker Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Erin R Gardner; William L Dahut; Charity D Scripture; Jacquin Jones; Jeanny B Aragon-Ching; Neil Desai; Michael J Hawkins; Alex Sparreboom; William D Figg Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J D Hurt; D L Richardson; L G Seamon; J F Fowler; L J Copeland; D E Cohn; E Eisenhauer; R Salani; D M O'Malley Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-10-04 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: David S Miller; John A Blessing; Carolyn N Krasner; Robert S Mannel; Parviz Hanjani; Michael L Pearl; Steven E Waggoner; Cecelia H Boardman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David M Boruta; Wesley C Fowler; Paola A Gehrig; John F Boggess; Leslie A Walton; Linda Van Le Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: David E Cohn; Michael W Sill; Joan L Walker; David O'Malley; Christa I Nagel; Teresa L Rutledge; William Bradley; Debra L Richardson; Katherine M Moxley; Carol Aghajanian Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: A Parisi; E Palluzzi; A Cortellini; T Sidoni; V Cocciolone; P Lanfiuti Baldi; G Porzio; C Ficorella; K Cannita Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Rong Liu; Denis M Gilmore; Kimberly Ann V Zubris; Xiaoyin Xu; Paul J Catalano; Robert F Padera; Mark W Grinstaff; Yolonda L Colson Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2012-12-08 Impact factor: 12.479