Literature DB >> 21497034

Feasibility of 3.0T pelvic MR imaging in the evaluation of endometriosis.

L Manganaro1, F Fierro, A Tomei, D Irimia, P Lodise, M E Sergi, V Vinci, P Sollazzo, M G Porpora, R Delfini, G Vittori, M Marini.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis represents an important clinical problem in women of reproductive age with high impact on quality of life, work productivity and health care management. The aim of this study is to define the role of 3T magnetom system MRI in the evaluation of endometriosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six women, with transvaginal (TV) ultrasound examination positive for endometriosis, with pelvic pain, or infertile underwent an MR 3.0T examination with the following protocol: T2 weighted FRFSE HR sequences, T2 weighted FRFSE HR CUBE 3D sequences, T1 w FSE sequences, LAVA-flex sequences. Pelvic anatomy, macroscopic endometriosis implants, deep endometriosis implants, fallopian tube involvement, adhesions presence, fluid effusion in Douglas pouch, uterus and kidney pathologies or anomalies associated and sacral nervous routes were considered by two radiologists in consensus. Laparoscopy was considered the gold standard.
RESULTS: MRI imaging diagnosed deep endometriosis in 22/46 patients, endometriomas not associated to deep implants in 9/46 patients, 15/46 patients resulted negative for endometriosis, 11 of 22 patients with deep endometriosis reported ovarian endometriosis cyst. We obtained high percentages of sensibility (96.97%), specificity (100.00%), VPP (100.00%), VPN (92.86%).
CONCLUSION: Pelvic MRI performed with 3T system guarantees high spatial and contrast resolution, providing accurate information about endometriosis implants, with a good pre-surgery mapping of the lesions involving both bowels and bladder surface and recto-uterine ligaments.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21497034     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  17 in total

Review 1.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

2.  Fat suppression strategies in MR imaging of breast cancer at 3.0 T: comparison of the two-point Dixon technique and the frequency selective inversion method.

Authors:  Wakako Kaneko Mikami; Toshiki Kazama; Hirotaka Sato; Hajime Yokota; Takashi Higashide; Takuro Horikoshi; Ken Motoori; Yukimasa Miyazawa; Takeshi Nagashima; Takashi Uno
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  MRI for the diagnosis and staging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: a national survey of BSGE accredited endometriosis centres and review of the literature.

Authors:  Marianne Wild; Shikha Pandhi; John Rendle; Ian Swift; Emmanuel Ofuasia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Efficacy of Laparoscopic Partial Cystectomy with a Transurethral Resectoscope in Patients with Bladder Endometriosis: See-Through Technique.

Authors:  Yuki Endo; Jun Akatsuka; Kotaro Obayashi; Hayato Takeda; Tatsuro Hayashi; Satoko Nakayama; Yasutomo Suzuki; Tsutomu Hamasaki; Yukihiro Kondo
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography to evaluate sacral nerve root abnormalities in endometriosis-related pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  L Manganaro; M G Porpora; V Vinci; S Bernardo; P Lodise; P Sollazzo; M E Sergi; M Saldari; G Pace; G Vittori; C Catalano; P Pantano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Application study of 3D LAVA-Flex on lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  Tiefang Liu; Yonghao Wang; Zhengyang Xu; Tao Wu; Xiao Zang; Meng Li; Jinfeng Li
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.175

7.  Impaired uterine artery flow associated with the presence of ovarian endometrioma: preliminary results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Porpora; Federica Tomao; Lucia Manganaro; Deliar Yazdanian; Eliana Fuggetta; Maria Grazia Piccioni; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Giuseppe Benagiano
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.234

8.  A promise in the treatment of endometriosis: an observational cohort study on ovarian endometrioma reduction by N-acetylcysteine.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Porpora; Roberto Brunelli; Graziella Costa; Ludovica Imperiale; Ewa K Krasnowska; Thomas Lundeberg; Italo Nofroni; Maria Grazia Piccioni; Eugenia Pittaluga; Adele Ticino; Tiziana Parasassi
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Is CA72-4 a useful biomarker in differential diagnosis between ovarian endometrioma and epithelial ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Emanuela Anastasi; Lucia Manganaro; Teresa Granato; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Luigi Frati; Maria Grazia Porpora
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.434

10.  The use of HE4, CA125 and CA72-4 biomarkers for differential diagnosis between ovarian endometrioma and epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Emanuela Anastasi; Teresa Granato; Renato Falzarano; Paola Storelli; Adele Ticino; Luigi Frati; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Maria Grazia Porpora
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.