Literature DB >> 21496067

Process evaluation of a multiple risk factor perinatal programme for a hard-to-reach minority group.

Arlette E Hesselink1, Janneke Harting.   

Abstract

AIM: This article is a report of an evaluation of a multiple risk factor perinatal programme tailored to ethnic Turkish women in the Netherlands.
BACKGROUND: The programme was directed at multiple risk factors and aimed at improving maternal lifestyle, infant care practices and psychosocial health during pregnancy and after delivery. The programme was carried out by ethnic Turkish community health workers in collaboration with midwives and physiotherapists.
METHODS: Our multiple case study included three Parent-Child Centres providing integrated maternity and infant care. Participants (n = 119) were first and second generation pregnant ethnic Turkish women with relatively unfavourable risk profiles. Data were collected between 2005 and 2008 using mixed methods, including field notes, observations and recordings of group classes, attendance logs, semi-structured individual interviews, a focus group interview, and structured questionnaires.
FINDINGS: Most participants (82%) were first generation ethnic Turkish; 47% had a low educational level; 43% were pregnant with their first child; and 34% had a minimal knowledge of the Dutch language. The community health workers' Turkish background was vital in overcoming cultural and language barriers and creating a confidential atmosphere. Participants, midwives and health workers were positive about the programme. Midwives also observed improvements of knowledge and self-confidence amongst the participants. The integration of the community health workers into midwifery practices was crucial for a successful programme implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: A culturally sensitive perinatal programme is able to gain access to a hard-to-reach minority group at increased risk for poor perinatal health outcomes. Such a programme may be well received and potentially effective.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21496067     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05644.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  6 in total

Review 1.  Approaches to improving the contribution of the nursing and midwifery workforce to increasing universal access to primary health care for vulnerable populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  A J Dawson; A M Nkowane; A Whelan
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2015-12-18

2.  Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: Is more better? Reflections from a South African study.

Authors:  Willem Odendaal; Salla Atkins; Simon Lewin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Group based prenatal care in a low-and high risk population in the Netherlands: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Birgit S van Zwicht; Matty R Crone; Jan M M van Lith; Marlies E B Rijnders
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Implementation science in maternity care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Ann Dadich; Annika Piper; Dominiek Coates
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  Community boundary spanners as an addition to the health workforce to reach marginalised people: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Carolyn Wallace; Jane Farmer; Anthony McCosker
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2018-09-10

Review 6.  A Systematic Review of Perinatal Social Support Interventions for Asylum-seeking and Refugee Women Residing in Europe.

Authors:  Marie-Clare Balaam; Carol Kingdon; Melanie Haith-Cooper
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2021-07-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.