Literature DB >> 21495868

Epigenetic screening in product safety assessment: are we there yet?

Reza J Rasoulpour1, Matthew J LeBaron, Robert G Ellis-Hutchings, Joanna Klapacz, B Bhaskar Gollapudi.   

Abstract

There has been a growing concern that epigenetic events, that is, heritable changes in gene expression superimposed on DNA nucleotide sequences, may be involved in chemically and/or nutritionally mediated adverse health outcomes, such as reproductive toxicity and cancer. This concern has been driven by an increasing number of studies reporting toxicant-induced alterations to the epigenome in the form of changes in DNA methylation, histone/chromatin remodeling, and altered expression of non-coding RNAs. These three major mechanisms of epigenetic modifications may have coordinated, independent, or potentially antagonistic influences on gene expression. Complicating this understanding is the incomplete understanding of the normal state and dynamic variation of the epigenome, which differs widely between cells, tissues, developmental state, age, strain, and species. This review serves as a framework to outline characteristics composing an ideal epigenetic screen(s) for hazard identification in product safety assessment. In order to implement such a screen, first there needs to be a better understanding of adaptive versus adverse changes in the epigenome, which includes identification of robust and reproducible causal links between epigenetic changes and adverse apical end points, and second development of improved reporter assay tools to monitor such changes. An ideal screen would be in vitro-based, medium- to high-throughput, and assess all three branches of epigenome control (i.e. methylation, histone modifications, non-coding RNAs), although also being quantitative, objective, portable (i.e. lab to lab), and relevant to humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21495868     DOI: 10.3109/15376516.2011.557883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods        ISSN: 1537-6516            Impact factor:   2.987


  7 in total

1.  Dose-response analysis of epigenetic, metabolic, and apical endpoints after short-term exposure to experimental hepatotoxicants.

Authors:  Isabelle R Miousse; Lynea A Murphy; Haixia Lin; Melissa R Schisler; Jinchun Sun; Marie-Cecile G Chalbot; Radhakrishna Sura; Kamin Johnson; Matthew J LeBaron; Ilias G Kavouras; Laura K Schnackenberg; Richard D Beger; Reza J Rasoulpour; Igor Koturbash
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 2.  Chromatin dynamics underlying latent responses to xenobiotics.

Authors:  Jonathan Moggs; Rémi Terranova
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Toxicoepigenetics for Risk Assessment: Bridging the Gap Between Basic and Regulatory Science.

Authors:  Anne Le Goff; Séverine Louvel; Henri Boullier; Patrick Allard
Journal:  Epigenet Insights       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 4.  Environmental toxicants, epigenetics, and cancer.

Authors:  Igor P Pogribny; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Disagreement between two common biomarkers of global DNA methylation.

Authors:  Claudia Knothe; Hiromi Shiratori; Eduard Resch; Alfred Ultsch; Gerd Geisslinger; Alexandra Doehring; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 6.551

6.  Considerations for Using Genetic and Epigenetic Information in Occupational Health Risk Assessment and Standard Setting.

Authors:  P A Schulte; C Whittaker; C P Curran
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  The Promises and Challenges of Toxico-Epigenomics: Environmental Chemicals and Their Impacts on the Epigenome.

Authors:  Felicia Fei-Lei Chung; Zdenko Herceg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.