Literature DB >> 21495200

Expression of MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 cancer/testis antigens in medullary breast cancer: retrospective immunohistochemical study.

Bozica Matković1, Antonio Juretić, Giulio C Spagnoli, Viktor Separović, Marija Gamulin, Robert Separović, Nera Sarić, Martina Basić-Koretić, Irena Novosel, Bozo Kruslin.   

Abstract

AIM: To immunohistochemically evaluate the expression of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A, and NY-ESO-1 cancer/testis (C/T) tumor antigens in medullary breast cancer (MBC) tumor samples and to analyze it in relation to the clinicopathological features.
METHODS: This retrospective study included samples from 49 patients: 40 with typical MBC and 9 with atypical MBC. Tumor specimens were obtained from patients operated on in the University Hospital for Tumors and the Sisters of Mercy University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia, from 1999 to 2005. Standard immunohistochemistry was used on archival paraffin-embedded MBC tissues.
RESULTS: MAGE-A1, MAGE-A, and NY-ESO-1 antigens were expressed in 33% (16/49), 33% (16/49), and 22% (11/49) of patients, respectively. No difference between the groups with and without C/T tumor antigen expression in age at diagnosis, tumor size, axillary lymph node metastasis, adjuvant therapy, and HER-2 expression was identified. Significantly more patients died in the MAGE-A-positive group than in the MAGE-A-negative group (P=0.010), whereas a borderline significance was found between MAGE-A1-positive and the MAGE-A1-negative group (P=0.079) and between NY-ESO-1-positive and NY-ESO-1-negative group (P=0.117). Overall survival, as evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier curves, was lower in MAGE-A1- (P=0.031), MAGE-A- (P=0.004), NY-ESO-1-positive groups (P=0.077).
CONCLUSION: Expression of C/T antigens may represent a marker of potential prognostic relevance in MBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21495200      PMCID: PMC3081216          DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Croat Med J        ISSN: 0353-9504            Impact factor:   1.351


Breast cancers are a very heterogeneous group of diseases in terms of natural history, histopathological features, genetic alterations, gene-expression profiles, and response to treatment (1-5). Medullary breast cancers (MBC), both typical and atypical, account for <2% of breast invasive carcinomas. Despite histopathologically highly malignant characteristics, operable and non-metastatic MBCs have a more favorable prognosis than the more common infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma of the same stage (1,6-13). Recent updating of breast cancer classification, based on gene expression profile analyses, has indicated that MBCs can be considered as part of the basal-like carcinoma spectrum made up of the estrogen receptor (ER) negative-, progesterone receptor (PR) negative-, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative tumors (‘triple-negative phenotype’) (14-17). Cancer/testis (C/T) antigens are a subgroup of tumor-associated antigens expressed in normal testis germ line cells and trophoblast, and in various malignancies of different histological types. They were discovered in the last two decades by a combination of immunological and molecular biology techniques. Most genes that encode these antigens are localized on the X-chromosome, frequently as multigene families and are referred to as CT-X genes or CT-X antigens (18-23). Biological functions of C/T genes and C/T antigens in both germ lines and tumors remain poorly understood. Due to their tumor-associated expression pattern and limited presence in normal tissues, C/T antigens appear to be valuable targets for immunotherapy of cancer. The best-studied C/T antigens are those of the MAGE-A family and the NY-ESO-1 antigen (18-23). Our initial reports on C/T antigens expression detected by immunohistochemistry in breast invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type (24,25) has been confirmed by other studies (26,27). However, these studies have not been performed on special or relatively rare histological types of breast cancers, such as the MBC. We have recently reported clinicopathological features of MBCs in 48 patients who were operated on in our two hospitals between 1999 and 2005 (28). The present study includes immunohistochemical analysis of the expression of C/T antigens MAGE-A, MAGE-A1, and NY-ESO 1 in these MBC samples.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study included samples from 49 patients: 40 with typical and 9 with atypical MBC (28). Tumor specimens were obtained from patients operated on in the University Hospital for Tumors and the Sisters of Mercy University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia, from 1999 to 2005. The patients were identified retrospectively in 2006 from pathological reports from the Departments of Pathology of the two hospitals. At the time of diagnosis, patients had nonmetastatic MBC (M0). Adjuvant therapy data were obtained from patients’ medical reports from the hospitals’ Oncology Departments (Table 1). The patients’ survival data were obtained at the end of 2008 from the Croatian National Cancer Registry and through personal contacts with patients and their physicians. The data on the disease-free survival were not available. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospitals (28).
Table 1

Patients’ and medullary breast cancer characteristics

Characteristics, No. (%)Medullary breast cancer patients (n = 49)
Age at diagnosis (years; median, range)
51 (28-82)
Type of surgery:

mastectomy with axillary dissection
29 (59)
segmentectomy with axillary dissection
20 (41)
Tumor size (cm; median, range)
2.4 (0.8-5.0)
pT1
20 (41)
pT2
28 (57)
pT3
1 (2)
pT4
0
Axillary lymph node metastasis

no
32 (65)
yes
17 (35)
Adjuvant therapy*:

no
2 (4)
radiotherapy
12 (24)
chemotherapy
23 (47)
chemotherapy + radiotherapy
12 (24)
Survival (follow-up time in months; median, range):
68 (8-164)
alive
43 (88)
dead
6 (12)
dead (follow-up time in months; median, range)
42.5 (13-53)
Estrogen receptor:

negative
46 (94)
positive
3 (6)
Progesterone receptor:

negative
41 (84)
positive
8 (16)
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2:

negative (-, + or ++)
35 (71)
positive (+++)
14 (29)
MAGE-A1:

negative (-)
33 (67)
positive (+,++,+++)
16 (33)
MAGE-A:

negative (-)
33 (67)
positive (+,++,+++)
16 (33)
NY-ESO 1:

negative (-)
38 (78)
positive (+,++,+++)11 (22)

*At that time, adjuvant trastuzumab was not a standard therapy for the HER-2 +++ positive patients, ie, a therapy covered by our national health insurance system.

Patients’ and medullary breast cancer characteristics *At that time, adjuvant trastuzumab was not a standard therapy for the HER-2 +++ positive patients, ie, a therapy covered by our national health insurance system. For routine histological analysis, the resected breast tissue was fixed immediately after surgery in 10% buffered formalin and later embedded in paraffin. From paraffin-embedded tumor samples, 4-μm thick sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and reviewed by the experienced pathologist (VS, BK, IN) in order to establish the diagnosis. Immunohistochemical staining was performed by appropriate monoclonal antibodies (mab) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, as previously reported (19,24,25,28). Mab 1D5 (M7047, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and 1A6 (M3569 Dako) were used to detect ER and PR receptors, respectively. The DAKO Hercept TestTM kit (polyclonal antibody DA485, K5206, Dako), approved by the Food and Drug Administration, was used to detect HER-2. Immunohistochemical staining was performed following the Microwave Streptavidin Immuno Peroxidase protocol on DAKO TechMate Horizon automated immunostainer. Immunohistochemistry for C/T antigens MAGE-A1 (mab 77B) (29), multi MAGE-A (mab 57B) (30), and NY-ESO-1 (mab B9.8.1) (31) was performed following the same procedure. Positive staining for ER and PR was defined as nuclear staining in ≥10% of tumor cells, while positive staining for HER-2 was defined based on the percentage of tumor cells and the intensity of membrane staining. HER-2 immunostaning was considered positive when strong (+++) membranous staining was observed in at least 10% of tumor cells, whereas cases with 0 to ++ were regarded as negative (19,28). The staining for MAGE-A1, MAGE-A, and NY-ESO-1 was defined as weak with positive reaction when there were ≤10% of tumor cells (+), moderate with positive reaction when there were between 10 and 50% of tumor cells (++), and strong with positive reaction (+++) when there were >50% of tumor cells (Table 1) (24,25,28). Representative examples of immunohistochemical staining obtained with these mabs are presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Immunohistochemical staining of MAGE-A1 and MAGE-A in medullary breast cancer tissues. (A) MAGE-A1 positive staining by monoclonal antibody 77B (PAP 40 × ). (B) MAGE-A positive staining by monoclonal antibody 57B (PAP 200 × ).

Immunohistochemical staining of MAGE-A1 and MAGE-A in medullary breast cancer tissues. (A) MAGE-A1 positive staining by monoclonal antibody 77B (PAP 40 × ). (B) MAGE-A positive staining by monoclonal antibody 57B (PAP 200 × ). Statistical analysis was performed using Statistics 5.5 software package (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). χ2 test was used for the group difference analysis of qualitative features, Fischer exact test for variables with low frequencies, nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test for numeric variables, and Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test for survival analysis. P values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results and discussion

Patients’ median age was 51 years (range, 28-82 years). Modified radical mastectomy was the predominant operational procedure (29/49; 59%). The median tumor size was 2.4 cm (range, 0.8-5.0 cm) and axillary lymph node metastases were found in 17 out of 49 patients (35%). pT1 tumor size was found in 20, pT2 in 28, and pT3 in 1 patient. The majority of patients were ER- and PR-negative (94% and 84%, respectively). Twenty nine percent of patients (14 out of 49) were HER-2 antigen strongly positive (+++). Adjuvant therapy was applied in all but 2 patients (4%). The mean follow-up time of patients was 68 months (range, 8 to 164 months) and 43 out of 49 patients survived (88%). MAGE-A1, multi MAGE-A, and NY-ESO-1 specific staining was detectable in 33% (16/49), 33% (16/49), and 22% (11/49) of patients, respectively (Table 1). Groups with and without expression of MAGE-A1, multi MAGE-A, and NY-ESO-1 were compared according to the following MBC clinicopathological features: patient’s age at diagnosis, type of operation, tumor size, presence of axillary lymph node metastasis, adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and radiotherapy), HER-2 expression, and patient's survival. There was no difference between groups with and without C/T tumor antigen expression in these clinicopathologic parameters. Compared with MAGE-A-negative group, significantly greater number of patients died in the MAGE-A-positive group (P = 0.010), whereas borderline significance was found between the MAGE-A1-positive and MAGE-A1- negative group (P = 0.079) and betweenNY-ESO-1-positive and NY-ESO-1-negative group (P = 0.117). Overall survival of patients with MBC, as evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier curves, was lower in the groups expressing C/T antigens (Table 2). In particular, MAGE-A1-positive group had a significantly lower overall survival (P = 0.031, log-rank test) than MAGE-A1-negative group (Figure 2A). Similarly, multi MAGE-A positivity was also associated with a significantly lower overall survival (P = 0.004) (Figure 2B). A similar trend was also detectable for NY-ESO-1 (P = 0.077), although the difference did not reach significance (Figure 2C).
Table 2

Comparison of groups with and without MAGE-A1, MAGE-A, and NY-ESO-1 expression according to medullary breast cancer clinicopathological features


No. (%) of patients with tumor expressing

MAGE-A1MAGE-ANY-ESO-1
Characteristics
negative, n = 33 (67)
positive, n = 16 (33)
P
negative, n = 33 (67)
positive, n = 16 (33)
P
negative, n = 38 (78)
positive, n = 11 (22)
P
Age (years; median, range)
52 (28-69)
48.5 (32-82)
0.847
53 (28-69)
47.5 (32-82)
0.423
52 (34-82)
49 (28-61)
0.110
Tumor size (cm; median, range)
2.4 (0.8-5.0)
2.3 (0.8-4.0)
0.659
2.3 (0.8-5.0)
2.5 (1.2-4.0)
0.165
2.3 (0.8-5.0)
2.5 (1.1-4.0)
0.499
Axillary lymph node metastasis
12 (36)
5 (31)
0.973*
13 (39)
4 (25)
0.501*
15 (40)
2 (18)
0.287
Adjuvant chemotherapy
22 (67)
13 (81)
0.336
25 (76)
10 (63)
0.501
28 (74)
7 (64)
0.705
Adjuvant radiotherapy
15 (46)
9 (56)
0.686*
18 (55)
6 (38)
0.415*
19 (50)
5 (46)
0.938*
Estrogen receptor positive
2 (6)
1 (6)
-
3 (9)
0 (0)
-
3 (8)
0 (0)
-
Progesterone receptor positive
7 (21)
1 (6)
0.245
7 (21)
1 (6)
0.245
7 (18)
1 (9)
0.663
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (+++)
9 (27)
5 (31)
1.000
7 (21)
7 (44)
0.175
11 (29)
3 (27)
1.000
No. of dead patients2 (6)4 (25)0.0791 (3)5 (31)0.0103 (8)3 (27)0.117

*χ2 test.

†Fischer exact test.

‡Mann-Whitney U test; significant values are italicized.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the expression of MAGE-A1, log rank test; P = 0.031 (A), MAGE-A, log rank test; P = 0.004 (B), and NY-ESO-1, log rank test; P = 0.077 (C) in medullary breast cancer tissues. Closed circle – dead patients; open circle – alive patients; full line – negative expression; interrupted line – positive expression.

Comparison of groups with and without MAGE-A1, MAGE-A, and NY-ESO-1 expression according to medullary breast cancer clinicopathological features *χ2 test. †Fischer exact test. ‡Mann-Whitney U test; significant values are italicized. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the expression of MAGE-A1, log rank test; P = 0.031 (A), MAGE-A, log rank test; P = 0.004 (B), and NY-ESO-1, log rank test; P = 0.077 (C) in medullary breast cancer tissues. Closed circle – dead patients; open circle – alive patients; full line – negative expression; interrupted line – positive expression. Our study suggested that the studied C/T antigens may be used in MBC as tumor markers of potential prognostic relevance. Due to the relative rarity of this type of breast cancer, in order to obtain a final confirmation of this observation, the expression of these C/T antigens needs to be investigated on a greater number of tumor samples. Interestingly, however, a recent publications by Grigoriadis et al (27) and Curigliano et al (32) have pointed out that the expression of CT-X antigens is more frequent in the ER-negative subgroup of breast cancers, including triple-negative and basal-like breast cancers. However, expression of CT-X antigens, to our knowledge, has not been studied specifically in MBC. In studies on squamous non-small-cell lung carcinomas (33), transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder (34), and gynecologic (35,36) and gastric neoplasms (37), expression of C/T antigens has been found to be correlated with patients' shorter tumor-specific survival. It is still unclear whether C/T antigen expression contributes to tumorigenesis or represents an epiphenomenon in the process of cellular transformation related to the global genome hypomethylation (20-22,38-41) frequently occurring in highly aggressive cancers. However, our data reinforce the notion that C/T antigen specific immunization, possibly in the early stages of the disease, ie, after surgery, might be clinically relevant in selected groups of patients (19,20,23).
  41 in total

1.  Prospective study on the expression of cancer testis genes and antibody responses in 100 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Axel Mischo; Boris Kubuschok; Kubilay Ertan; Klaus-Dieter Preuss; Bernd Romeike; Evi Regitz; Claudia Schormann; Diederik de Bruijn; Andreas Wadle; Frank Neumann; Werner Schmidt; Christoph Renner; Michael Pfreundschuh
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Typical medullary breast carcinomas have a basal/myoepithelial phenotype.

Authors:  Jocelyne Jacquemier; Laetitia Padovani; Laetitia Rabayrol; Sunil R Lakhani; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Yves Denoux; Maryse Fiche; Paulo Figueiro; Véronique Maisongrosse; Viviane Ledoussal; Jose Martinez Penuela; Nora Udvarhely; George El Makdissi; Christophe Ginestier; Jeannine Geneix; Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret; Luc Xerri; François Eisinger; Daniel Birnbaum; Hagay Sobol
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 3.  Concise review: cancer/testis antigens, stem cells, and cancer.

Authors:  Fabrício F Costa; Katarina Le Blanc; Bertha Brodin
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 6.277

4.  [Diagnosis and immunohistochemistry of medullary breast cancer].

Authors:  S Milde; J Gaedcke; R v Wasielewski; H Bruchardt; L Wingen; D Gadzicki; H Arps; H H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Gene expression profiling shows medullary breast cancer is a subgroup of basal breast cancers.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Pascal Finetti; Nathalie Cervera; Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret; Emilie Mamessier; José Adélaïde; Stéphane Debono; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Dominique Maraninchi; Patrice Viens; Colette Charpin; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Daniel Birnbaum
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  A potential role for epigenetic modulatory drugs in the enhancement of cancer/germ-line antigen vaccine efficacy.

Authors:  Adam R Karpf
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 7.  Epigenetic remodelling of DNA in cancer.

Authors:  A A Lettini; M Guidoboni; E Fonsatti; L Anzalone; E Cortini; M Maio
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 8.  Breast cancer: origins and evolution.

Authors:  Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Sporadic invasive breast carcinomas with medullary features display a basal-like phenotype: an immunohistochemical and gene amplification study.

Authors:  Socorro María Rodríguez-Pinilla; Yolanda Rodríguez-Gil; Gema Moreno-Bueno; David Sarrió; M Del Carmen Martín-Guijarro; Lucía Hernandez; José Palacios
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Identification of typical medullary breast carcinoma as a genomic sub-group of basal-like carcinomas, a heterogeneous new molecular entity.

Authors:  Anne Vincent-Salomon; Nadège Gruel; Carlo Lucchesi; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Remi Dendale; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Michel Longy; Virginie Raynal; Gaëlle Pierron; Isabelle de Mascarel; Corinne Taris; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Jean-Yves Pierga; Rémy Salmon; Xavier Sastre-Garau; Alain Fourquet; Olivier Delattre; Patricia de Cremoux; Alain Aurias
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  6 in total

1.  MAGEA1 interacts with FBXW7 and regulates ubiquitin ligase-mediated turnover of NICD1 in breast and ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  J Zhao; Y Wang; C Mu; Y Xu; J Sang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Sperm protein 17, MAGE-C1 and NY-ESO-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma: expression frequency and their correlation with clinical parameters.

Authors:  Qiu-Yuan Xia; Song Liu; Fang-Qiu Li; Wen-Bin Huang; Li-Ning Shi; Xiao-Jun Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-07-15

3.  The Co-Expression of Melanoma-Antigen Family a Proteins and New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-1 in Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Yu-Xin Wang; Feng-Lian Li; Li-Xin Du; Jun-Fang Liu; Li-Gang Huo; Shu-Qing Li; Bin Tian
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Evaluation of cancer testis antigen (CT10, PRAME) and MHC I expression in high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Anjelica Hodgson; Achim A Jungbluth; Nora Katabi; Bin Xu; Michelle R Downes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  A novel cancer testis antigen, A-kinase anchor protein 4 (AKAP4) is a potential biomarker for breast cancer.

Authors:  Shikha Saini; Nirmala Jagadish; Anju Gupta; Amar Bhatnagar; Anil Suri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The expression and clinical significance of melanoma-associated antigen-A1, -A3 and -A11 in glioma.

Authors:  Liru Guo; Meixiang Sang; Qingrui Liu; Xiaojie Fan; Xiao Zhang; Baoen Shan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.967

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.