BACKGROUND: Depression is the most common mental disorder, and suicide is its most serious consequence. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate preliminary evidence for the P4 screener as a brief measure to assess potential suicide risk. METHOD: The P4 screener was prospectively evaluated in 2 randomized effectiveness trials of primary care (January 2005-June 2008; N = 250) and oncology patients (March 2006-August 2009; N = 309). Potential suicide ideation was assessed at 5 time points in both trials: baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The P4 screener asks about the "4 P's": past suicide attempts, suicide plan, probability of completing suicide, and preventive factors. Patients were classified as minimal, lower, and higher risk based upon responses to these 4 items. RESULTS: A suicide assessment was triggered 1 or more times by 17.6% (44 of 250) of Stepped Care for Affective Disorders and Musculoskeletal Pain (SCAMP) participants and 16.5% (51 of 309) of Indiana Cancer Pain and Depression (INCPAD) participants at some point in the trial. Of the patients who triggered a suicide assessment, the majority (29 of 44 in SCAMP and 27 of 51 in INCPAD) were classified as minimal risk by the algorithm. Only 1 (0.4%) of the SCAMP participants and 5 (1.6%) of the INCPAD participants were classified as higher risk. Among the latter, the most common factors preventing patients from attempting suicide were the "4 F's": faith, family, future hope, and fear of failing in their attempt. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that the P4 screener may be useful in assessing potential suicide risk in the clinical care of depressed patients as well as in clinical research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00118430 (SCAMP) and NCT00313573 (INCPAD).
BACKGROUND:Depression is the most common mental disorder, and suicide is its most serious consequence. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate preliminary evidence for the P4 screener as a brief measure to assess potential suicide risk. METHOD: The P4 screener was prospectively evaluated in 2 randomized effectiveness trials of primary care (January 2005-June 2008; N = 250) and oncology patients (March 2006-August 2009; N = 309). Potential suicide ideation was assessed at 5 time points in both trials: baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The P4 screener asks about the "4 P's": past suicide attempts, suicide plan, probability of completing suicide, and preventive factors. Patients were classified as minimal, lower, and higher risk based upon responses to these 4 items. RESULTS: A suicide assessment was triggered 1 or more times by 17.6% (44 of 250) of Stepped Care for Affective Disorders and Musculoskeletal Pain (SCAMP) participants and 16.5% (51 of 309) of Indiana Cancer Pain and Depression (INCPAD) participants at some point in the trial. Of the patients who triggered a suicide assessment, the majority (29 of 44 in SCAMP and 27 of 51 in INCPAD) were classified as minimal risk by the algorithm. Only 1 (0.4%) of the SCAMPparticipants and 5 (1.6%) of the INCPAD participants were classified as higher risk. Among the latter, the most common factors preventing patients from attempting suicide were the "4 F's": faith, family, future hope, and fear of failing in their attempt. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that the P4 screener may be useful in assessing potential suicide risk in the clinical care of depressedpatients as well as in clinical research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00118430 (SCAMP) and NCT00313573 (INCPAD).
Authors: Jürgen Unützer; Lingqi Tang; Sabine Oishi; Wayne Katon; John W Williams; Enid Hunkeler; Hugh Hendrie; Elizabeth H B Lin; Stuart Levine; Lydia Grypma; David C Steffens; Julie Fields; Christopher Langston Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Linda S Williams; Kurt Kroenke; Tamilyn Bakas; Laurie D Plue; Edward Brizendine; Wanzhu Tu; Hugh Hendrie Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mitchell D Feldman; Peter Franks; Paul R Duberstein; Steven Vannoy; Ronald Epstein; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Herbert C Schulberg; Martha L Bruce; Pamela W Lee; John W Williams; Allen J Dietrich Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Farifteh Firoozmand Duffy; Henry Chung; Madhukar Trivedi; Donald S Rae; Darrel A Regier; David J Katzelnick Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Qiu-Yue Zhong; Bizu Gelaye; Marta B Rondon; Sixto E Sánchez; Gregory E Simon; David C Henderson; Yasmin V Barrios; Pedro Mascaro Sánchez; Michelle A Williams Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Kurt Kroenke; Fitsum Baye; Spencer G Lourens; Erica Evans; Sharon Weitlauf; Stephanie McCalley; Brian Porter; Marianne S Matthias; Matthew J Bair Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Patrick M Carter; Charles A Mouch; Jason E Goldstick; Maureen A Walton; Marc A Zimmerman; Ken Resnicow; Rebecca M Cunningham Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Shubha Bhat; Miranda E Kroehl; Katy E Trinkley; Zeta Chow; Lauren J Heath; Sarah J Billups; Danielle F Loeb Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Janis E Gerkensmeyer; Cynthia S Johnson; Eric L Scott; Ukamaka M Oruche; Laura M Lindsey; Joan K Austin; Susan M Perkins Journal: Arch Psychiatr Nurs Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 2.218