Literature DB >> 18832500

Systematic use of patient-rated depression severity monitoring: is it helpful and feasible in clinical psychiatry?

Farifteh Firoozmand Duffy1, Henry Chung, Madhukar Trivedi, Donald S Rae, Darrel A Regier, David J Katzelnick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The gap between evidence-based treatments and routine care has been well established. Findings from the Sequenced Treatments Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) emphasized the importance of measurement-based care for the treatment of depression as a key ingredient for achieving response and remission; yet measurement-based care approaches are not commonly used in clinical practice.
METHODS: The Nine-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for monitoring depression severity was introduced in 19 diverse psychiatric practices. During the one-year course of the project the helpfulness and feasibility of implementation of PHQ-9 in these psychiatric practices were studied. The project was modeled after the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series. Two of the 19 practices dropped out during the course of the project.
RESULTS: By the conclusion of the study, all remaining 17 practices had adopted PHQ-9 as a routine part of depression care in their practice. On the basis of responses from 17 psychiatrists from those practices, PHQ-9 scores influenced clinical decision making for 93% of 6,096 patient contacts. With the additional information gained from the PHQ-9 score, one or more treatment changes occurred during 40% of these clinical contacts. Changing the dosage of antidepressant medication and adding another medication were the most common treatment changes recorded by psychiatrists, followed by starting or increasing psychotherapy and by switching or initiating antidepressants. In 3% of the patient contacts, using the PHQ-9 led to additional suicide risk assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that adopting measurement-based care, such as using the PHQ-9, is achievable, even in practices with limited resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18832500     DOI: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.10.1148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  30 in total

1.  Enhancing the clinical utility of depression screening.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Assessing anxious features in depressed outpatients.

Authors:  Shawn M McClintock; Mustafa M Husain; Ira H Bernstein; Stephen R Wisniewski; Madhukar H Trivedi; David Morris; Jonathan Alpert; Diane Warden; James F Luther; Susan G Kornstein; Melanie M Biggs; Maurizio Fava; A John Rush
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  The p4 screener: evaluation of a brief measure for assessing potential suicide risk in 2 randomized effectiveness trials of primary care and oncology patients.

Authors:  Priyanka Dube; Kroenke Kurt; Matthew J Bair; Dale Theobald; Linda S Williams
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010

4.  DSM-V perspectives on disentangling disability from clinical significance.

Authors:  William E Narrow; Emily A Kuhl; Darrel A Regier
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  Establishing Clinical Cutoffs for Response and Remission on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED).

Authors:  Nicole E Caporino; Dara Sakolsky; Douglas M Brodman; Joseph F McGuire; John Piacentini; Tara S Peris; Golda S Ginsburg; John T Walkup; Satish Iyengar; Philip C Kendall; Boris Birmaher
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 8.829

6.  Assessing the Quality and Value of Psychological Health Care in Civilian Health Plans: Lessons and Implications for the Military Health System.

Authors:  Grant R Martsolf; Karen Chan Osilla; Daniel Mandel; Kimberly A Hepner; Carrie M Farmer
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2016-05-09

7.  Integrating depression care: the time has come.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Research planning for the future of psychiatric diagnosis.

Authors:  D A Regier; E A Kuhl; W E Narrow; D J Kupfer
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 5.361

Review 9.  Approach to risk identification in undifferentiated mental disorders.

Authors:  José Silveira; Patricia Rockman; Casey Fulford; Jon Hunter
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 10.  Changes in clinical trials methodology over time: a systematic review of six decades of research in psychopharmacology.

Authors:  André R Brunoni; Laura Tadini; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.