Literature DB >> 21494314

Optimal Partitioning for Linear Mixed Effects Models: Applications to Identifying Placebo Responders.

Thaddeus Tarpey1, Eva Petkova, Yimeng Lu, Usha Govindarajulu.   

Abstract

A long-standing problem in clinical research is distinguishing drug treated subjects that respond due to specific effects of the drug from those that respond to non-specific (or placebo) effects of the treatment. Linear mixed effect models are commonly used to model longitudinal clinical trial data. In this paper we present a solution to the problem of identifying placebo responders using an optimal partitioning methodology for linear mixed effects models. Since individual outcomes in a longitudinal study correspond to curves, the optimal partitioning methodology produces a set of prototypical outcome profiles. The optimal partitioning methodology can accommodate both continuous and discrete covariates. The proposed partitioning strategy is compared and contrasted with the growth mixture modelling approach. The methodology is applied to a two-phase depression clinical trial where subjects in a first phase were treated openly for 12 weeks with fluoxetine followed by a double blind discontinuation phase where responders to treatment in the first phase were randomized to either stay on fluoxetine or switched to a placebo. The optimal partitioning methodology is applied to the first phase to identify prototypical outcome profiles. Using time to relapse in the second phase of the study, a survival analysis is performed on the partitioned data. The optimal partitioning results identify prototypical profiles that distinguish whether subjects relapse depending on whether or not they stay on the drug or are randomized to a placebo.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21494314      PMCID: PMC3007089          DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2010.ap08713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  16 in total

Review 1.  Validity of clinical trials of antidepressants.

Authors:  F M Quitkin; J G Rabkin; J Gerald; J M Davis; D F Klein
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Linear mixed models with flexible distributions of random effects for longitudinal data.

Authors:  D Zhang; M Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm.

Authors:  B Muthén; K Shedden
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The clustering of regression models method with applications in gene expression data.

Authors:  Li-Xuan Qin; Steven G Self
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Linear Transformations and the k-Means Clustering Algorithm: Applications to Clustering Curves.

Authors:  Thaddeus Tarpey
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 8.710

6.  A Parametric k-Means Algorithm.

Authors:  Thaddeus Tarpey
Journal:  Comput Stat       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Use of pattern analysis to predict differential relapse of remitted patients with major depression during 1 year of treatment with fluoxetine or placebo.

Authors:  J W Stewart; F M Quitkin; P J McGrath; J Amsterdam; M Fava; J Fawcett; F Reimherr; J Rosenbaum; C Beasley; P Roback
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1998-04

8.  Use of pattern analysis to identify true drug response. A replication.

Authors:  F M Quitkin; J D Rabkin; J M Markowitz; J W Stewart; P J McGrath; W Harrison
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1987-03

9.  Identification of true drug response to antidepressants. Use of pattern analysis.

Authors:  F M Quitkin; J G Rabkin; D Ross; J W Stewart
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1984-08

10.  Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Irving Kirsch; Brett J Deacon; Tania B Huedo-Medina; Alan Scoboria; Thomas J Moore; Blair T Johnson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  7 in total

1.  Massively parallel nonparametric regression, with an application to developmental brain mapping.

Authors:  Philip T Reiss; Lei Huang; Yin-Hsiu Chen; Lan Huo; Thaddeus Tarpey; Maarten Mennes
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.302

2.  Partitioning of Functional Data for Understanding Heterogeneity in Psychiatric Conditions.

Authors:  Eva Petkova; Thaddeus Tarpey
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 0.582

3.  Principal Point Classification: Applications to Differentiating Drug and Placebo Responses in Longitudinal Studies.

Authors:  Thaddeus Tarpey; Eva Petkova
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 1.111

4.  Optimal partitioning for the proportional hazards model.

Authors:  Usha Govindarajulu; Thaddeus Tarpey
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 1.416

5.  Stratified Psychiatry via Convexity-Based Clustering with Applications Towards Moderator Analysis.

Authors:  Thaddeus Tarpey; Eva Petkova; Liangyu Zhu
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 0.582

6.  Statistical Analysis Plan for Stage 1 EMBARC (Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care) Study.

Authors:  Eva Petkova; R Todd Ogden; Thaddeus Tarpey; Adam Ciarleglio; Bei Jiang; Zhe Su; Thomas Carmody; Philip Adams; Helena C Kraemer; Bruce D Grannemann; Maria A Oquendo; Ramin Parsey; Myrna Weissman; Patrick J McGrath; Maurizio Fava; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-02-24

7.  Partitioning of functional gene expression data using principal points.

Authors:  Jaehee Kim; Haseong Kim
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.