BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To characterize the spatial pattern of cerebral ischemic vulnerability to hypoperfusion in stroke patients. METHODS: We included 90 patients who underwent admission CT perfusion and MRI within 12 hours of ischemic stroke onset. Infarcted brain lesions ("core") were segmented from admission diffusion-weighted imaging and, along with the CT perfusion parameter maps, coregistered onto MNI-152 brain space, which was parcellated into 125 mirror cortical and subcortical regions per hemisphere. We tested the hypothesis that the percent infarction increment per unit of relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) reduction differs statistically between regions using regression analysis to assess the interaction between regional rCBF and region variables. Next, for each patient, a "vulnerability index" map was constructed with voxel values equaling the product of that voxel's rCBF and infarction probability (derived from the MNI-152-transformed, binary, segmented, diffusion-weighted imaging lesions). Voxel-based rCBF threshold for core was determined within the upper 20th percentile of vulnerability index map voxel values. RESULTS: Different regions had different percent infarction increase per unit rCBF reduction (P=0.001). The caudate body, putamen, insular ribbon, paracentral lobule, and precentral, middle, and inferior frontal gyri had the highest ischemic vulnerability to hypoperfusion. A voxel-based rCBF threshold of <0.42 optimally distinguished infarct core in the highly-vulnerable regions, whereas rCBF<0.16 distinguished core in the remainder of the brain. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated regional ischemic vulnerability of the brain to hypoperfusion in acute stroke patients. Location-specific, rather than whole-brain, rCBF thresholds may provide a more accurate metric for estimating infarct core using CT perfusion maps.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To characterize the spatial pattern of cerebral ischemic vulnerability to hypoperfusion in strokepatients. METHODS: We included 90 patients who underwent admission CT perfusion and MRI within 12 hours of ischemic stroke onset. Infarcted brain lesions ("core") were segmented from admission diffusion-weighted imaging and, along with the CT perfusion parameter maps, coregistered onto MNI-152 brain space, which was parcellated into 125 mirror cortical and subcortical regions per hemisphere. We tested the hypothesis that the percent infarction increment per unit of relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) reduction differs statistically between regions using regression analysis to assess the interaction between regional rCBF and region variables. Next, for each patient, a "vulnerability index" map was constructed with voxel values equaling the product of that voxel's rCBF and infarction probability (derived from the MNI-152-transformed, binary, segmented, diffusion-weighted imaging lesions). Voxel-based rCBF threshold for core was determined within the upper 20th percentile of vulnerability index map voxel values. RESULTS: Different regions had different percent infarction increase per unit rCBF reduction (P=0.001). The caudate body, putamen, insular ribbon, paracentral lobule, and precentral, middle, and inferior frontal gyri had the highest ischemic vulnerability to hypoperfusion. A voxel-based rCBF threshold of <0.42 optimally distinguished infarct core in the highly-vulnerable regions, whereas rCBF<0.16 distinguished core in the remainder of the brain. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated regional ischemic vulnerability of the brain to hypoperfusion in acute strokepatients. Location-specific, rather than whole-brain, rCBF thresholds may provide a more accurate metric for estimating infarct core using CT perfusion maps.
Authors: P W Schaefer; L Roccatagliata; C Ledezma; B Hoh; L H Schwamm; W Koroshetz; R G Gonzalez; M H Lev Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Michael S Bristow; Jessica E Simon; Robert A Brown; Michael Eliasziw; Michael D Hill; Shelagh B Coutts; Richard Frayne; Andrew M Demchuk; J Ross Mitchell Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Shuji Arakawa; Peter M Wright; Masatoshi Koga; Thanh G Phan; David C Reutens; Indra Lim; Marveyles R Gunawan; Henry Ma; Nilupul Perera; John Ly; Jorge Zavala; Gregory Fitt; Geoffery A Donnan Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-03-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Colin P Derdeyn; Tom O Videen; Kent D Yundt; Susanne M Fritsch; David A Carpenter; Robert L Grubb; William J Powers Journal: Brain Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Shervin Kamalian; Andre Kemmling; Roderick C Borgie; Livia T Morais; Seyedmehdi Payabvash; Ana M Franceschi; Shahmir Kamalian; Albert J Yoo; Karen L Furie; Michael H Lev Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M Wintermark; P C Sanelli; G W Albers; J Bello; C Derdeyn; S W Hetts; M H Johnson; C Kidwell; M H Lev; D S Liebeskind; H Rowley; P W Schaefer; J L Sunshine; G Zaharchuk; C C Meltzer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.825