BACKGROUND: Endothelial function is central to the localization of atherosclerosis. The in vivo endothelial phenotypic footprints of arterial bed identity and site-specific atherosusceptibility are addressed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-eight endothelial cell samples from 13 discrete coronary and noncoronary arterial regions of varying susceptibilities to atherosclerosis were isolated from 76 normal swine. Transcript profiles were analyzed to determine the steady-state in vivo endothelial phenotypes. An unsupervised systems biology approach using weighted gene coexpression networks showed highly correlated endothelial genes. Connectivity network analysis identified 19 gene modules, 12 of which showed significant association with circulatory bed classification. Differential expression of 1300 genes between coronary and noncoronary artery endothelium suggested distinct coronary endothelial phenotypes, with highest significance expressed in gene modules enriched for biological functions related to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and unfolded protein binding, regulation of transcription and translation, and redox homeostasis. Furthermore, within coronary arteries, comparison of endothelial transcript profiles of susceptible proximal regions to protected distal regions suggested the presence of ER stress conditions in susceptible sites. Accumulation of reactive oxygen species throughout coronary endothelium was greater than in noncoronary endothelium consistent with coronary artery ER stress and lower endothelial expression of antioxidant genes in coronary arteries. CONCLUSIONS: Gene connectivity analyses discriminated between coronary and noncoronary endothelial transcript profiles and identified differential transcript levels associated with increased ER and oxidative stress in coronary arteries consistent with enhanced susceptibility to atherosclerosis.
BACKGROUND: Endothelial function is central to the localization of atherosclerosis. The in vivo endothelial phenotypic footprints of arterial bed identity and site-specific atherosusceptibility are addressed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-eight endothelial cell samples from 13 discrete coronary and noncoronary arterial regions of varying susceptibilities to atherosclerosis were isolated from 76 normal swine. Transcript profiles were analyzed to determine the steady-state in vivo endothelial phenotypes. An unsupervised systems biology approach using weighted gene coexpression networks showed highly correlated endothelial genes. Connectivity network analysis identified 19 gene modules, 12 of which showed significant association with circulatory bed classification. Differential expression of 1300 genes between coronary and noncoronary artery endothelium suggested distinct coronary endothelial phenotypes, with highest significance expressed in gene modules enriched for biological functions related to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and unfolded protein binding, regulation of transcription and translation, and redox homeostasis. Furthermore, within coronary arteries, comparison of endothelial transcript profiles of susceptible proximal regions to protected distal regions suggested the presence of ER stress conditions in susceptible sites. Accumulation of reactive oxygen species throughout coronary endothelium was greater than in noncoronary endothelium consistent with coronary artery ER stress and lower endothelial expression of antioxidant genes in coronary arteries. CONCLUSIONS: Gene connectivity analyses discriminated between coronary and noncoronary endothelial transcript profiles and identified differential transcript levels associated with increased ER and oxidative stress in coronary arteries consistent with enhanced susceptibility to atherosclerosis.
Authors: Peter S Gargalovic; Minori Imura; Bin Zhang; Nima M Gharavi; Michael J Clark; Joanne Pagnon; Wen-Pin Yang; Aiqing He; Amy Truong; Shilpa Patel; Stanley F Nelson; Steve Horvath; Judith A Berliner; Todd G Kirchgessner; Aldons J Lusis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Melissa S Cline; Michael Smoot; Ethan Cerami; Allan Kuchinsky; Nerius Landys; Chris Workman; Rowan Christmas; Iliana Avila-Campilo; Michael Creech; Benjamin Gross; Kristina Hanspers; Ruth Isserlin; Ryan Kelley; Sarah Killcoyne; Samad Lotia; Steven Maere; John Morris; Keiichiro Ono; Vuk Pavlovic; Alexander R Pico; Aditya Vailaya; Peng-Liang Wang; Annette Adler; Bruce R Conklin; Leroy Hood; Martin Kuiper; Chris Sander; Ilya Schmulevich; Benno Schwikowski; Guy J Warner; Trey Ideker; Gary D Bader Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Mete Civelek; Elisabetta Manduchi; Rebecca J Riley; Christian J Stoeckert; Peter F Davies Journal: Circ Res Date: 2009-08-06 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jyoti D Malhotra; Hongzhi Miao; Kezhong Zhang; Anna Wolfson; Subramaniam Pennathur; Steven W Pipe; Randal J Kaufman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-11-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel J Green; Maria T E Hopman; Jaume Padilla; M Harold Laughlin; Dick H J Thijssen Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 37.312
Authors: Yi-Zhou Jiang; Juan M Jiménez; Kristy Ou; Margaret E McCormick; Ling-Di Zhang; Peter F Davies Journal: Circ Res Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 17.367