Literature DB >> 21493349

Validation of a quality-of-life measure for deaf or hard of hearing youth.

Donald L Patrick1, Todd C Edwards, Anne M Skalicky, Brenda Schick, Tari D Topolski, Poorna Kushalnagar, Mei Leng, Aprille M O'Neill-Kemp, Kathleen Sie Sie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Quality-of-life (QOL) measures targeting youth with hearing loss are useful in population needs assessment, educational placement, and program design and evaluation. This study assesses the cross-sectional validity of the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Deaf and Hard of Hearing Module (YQOL-DHH). STUDY DESIGN. Instrument development and cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Recruitment through schools, professional organizations, clinics, and programs for youth who are deaf or hard of hearing. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-five candidate items were administered to 230 adolescents aged 11 to 18 years: 49% female, 61% white, 11% mild hearing loss, 20% moderate/moderate-severe, 41% severe/profound, and 28% with cochlear implants. Participants completed individual or group-administered questionnaires by paper and pencil (58%), Web-based English (29%), American Sign Language (ASL) or Pidgin Signed English (PSE) (9%) on DVD, or interviewer-supervised ASL or PSE DVD (4%). The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI-S) was also completed. Factor structure, reliability, construct validity, and respondent burden were assessed.
RESULTS: Thirty-two items were retained in the final instrument covering 3 domains: self-acceptance/advocacy (14 items, Cronbach α = 0.84), perceived stigma (8 items, Cronbach α = 0.85), and participation (10 items, Cronbach α = 0.86). QOL was not significantly associated with hearing level. One-week test-retest coefficients were acceptable: self-acceptance/ advocacy (0.70), perceived stigma (0.78), and participation 0.92). As predicted, the total CDI-S score was associated in the appropriate direction (P < .0001) with all YQOL-DHH domains. Time to complete the paper-and-pencil version was 12 minutes.
CONCLUSION: The YQOL-DHH shows good reliability and validity for assessing hearing-specific QOL in adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21493349      PMCID: PMC4199826          DOI: 10.1177/0194599810397604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  14 in total

1.  Cochlear implant patients and quality of life.

Authors:  P J Karinen; M J Sorri; T T Välimaa; K H Huttunen; H J Löppönen
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.

Authors:  Neil Aaronson; Jordi Alonso; Audrey Burnam; Kathleen N Lohr; Donald L Patrick; Edward Perrin; Ruth E Stein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Adolescent quality of life, part II: initial validation of a new instrument.

Authors:  Donald L Patrick; Todd C Edwards; Tari D Topolski
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2002-06

4.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.

Authors:  R B Cattell
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1966-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Correlates of psychosocial adjustment in deaf adolescents with and without cochlear implants: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Irene W Leigh; Deborah Maxwell-McCaw; Yael Bat-Chava; John B Christiansen
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2008-10-14

Review 6.  Measuring health-related quality of life after pediatric cochlear implantation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frank R Lin; John K Niparko
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Outcomes and quality of life in conductive hearing loss.

Authors:  M G Stewart; N J Coker; H A Jenkins; S Manolidis; M H Bautista
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Health-related quality of life of Austrian children and adolescents with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Maria Huber
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Evaluating the health-related quality of life effects of cochlear implants: a prospective study of an adult cochlear implant program.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne; Anthony Hogan; Ellen Giles; Merril Stewart; Lee Kethel; Kate White; Barb Plaith; Karen Pedley; Emma Rushbrooke; Alan Taylor
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Validation of a parent outcome questionnaire from pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Terezinha Nunes; Ursula Pretzlik; Selin Ilicak
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2005-06-02
View more
  17 in total

1.  School placement and perceived quality of life in youth who are deaf or hard of hearing.

Authors:  Brenda Schick; Anne Skalicky; Todd Edwards; Poorna Kushalnagar; Tari Topolski; Donald Patrick
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2012-11-26

Review 2.  Quality of Life in Children with Hearing Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lauren Roland; Caroline Fischer; Kayla Tran; Tara Rachakonda; Dorina Kallogjeri; Judith E C Lieu
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Unilateral hearing loss in children: a retrospective study and a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Johannes Friedhoff; Andrea Bohnert; Achim Breitfuss; Markus Hess; Frank Müller; Anke Strauch; Marianne Röhrs; Thomas Wiesner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments for Children With Cochlear Implants: Development of Child and Parent-Proxy Measures.

Authors:  Michael F Hoffman; Ivette Cejas; Alexandra L Quittner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Validity, discriminative ability, and reliability of the hearing-related quality of life questionnaire for adolescents.

Authors:  Tara Rachakonda; Donna B Jeffe; Jennifer J Shin; Leila Mankarious; Robert J Fanning; Marci M Lesperance; Judith E C Lieu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 6.  Mode of communication, perceived level of understanding, and perceived quality of life in youth who are deaf or hard of hearing.

Authors:  P Kushalnagar; T D Topolski; B Schick; T C Edwards; A M Skalicky; D L Patrick
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2011-05-02

7.  Conceptual model for quality of life among adults with congenital or early deafness.

Authors:  Poorna Kushalnagar; Michael McKee; Scott R Smith; Melinda Hopper; Denise Kavin; Samuel R Atcherson
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 2.554

8.  Language and Psychosocial Functioning among Deaf Learners with and without Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Elizabeth Machmer; Linda J Spencer; Georgianna Borgna; Andreana Durkin; Carol Convertino
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2018-01-01

9.  Caregiver-Reported Indicators of Communication and Social Functioning for Young Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Donald L Patrick; Todd C Edwards; Poorna Kushalnagar; Tari Topolski; Brenda Schick; Ann Skalicky; Kathleen Sie
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2018-07-01

10.  Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Life Quality in children and adolescents in Norwegian Sign Language.

Authors:  Chris Margaret Aanondsen; Thomas Jozefiak; Kerstin Heiling; Stian Lydersen; Tormod Rimehaug
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.