Literature DB >> 21493292

Envoy Esteem Totally Implantable Hearing System: phase 2 trial, 1-year hearing results.

Eric M Kraus1, Jack A Shohet, Peter J Catalano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess outcomes of the Envoy Esteem Totally Implantable Hearing System as measured by hearing results compared with preimplant baseline unaided (BLU) and best-fit aided conditions (BLA) and (2) to determine safety of the device. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, subject-as-own-control, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) trial.
SETTING: Private practice and hospital-based. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and August 2009, an FDA trial was performed at 3 sites. Fifty-seven subjects with bilateral, mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss, with discrimination greater than 40%, were implanted. Implanted components were (1) a sound processor and (2) 2 piezoelectric transducers (a sensor and a driver). A sound processor was implanted in the temporal bone. Transducers were coupled to the ossicles. Devices were activated 2 months postimplant. Hearing results were compared with ipsilateral BLU and BLA.
RESULTS: Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) improved from BLA of 41.2 dB to 29.4 dB with the Esteem (P ≤ .001). Word recognition score (WRS) at 50 dB hearing level (HL) improved from BLA of 46.3% to 68.9% with the Esteem. Pure tone averages improved by 27 ± 1 dB (confidence interval, 30-25). There were no changes in bone conduction. QuickSIN results showed no change. There were 6 serious adverse device effects: 2 wound infections (1 resolved medically, 1 required explantation), 1 delayed facial paralysis that resolved with medication, and 3 revisions due to limited benefit.
CONCLUSION: Phase 2 results at 12 months post implant demonstrated that (1) hearing results with the device are statistically superior to baseline best-fit hearing aids for SRT and WRS and (2) the device is safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21493292     DOI: 10.1177/0194599811401709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  11 in total

1.  Esteem® middle ear device versus conventional hearing aids for rehabilitation of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Simonetta Monini; Michela Biagini; Francesca Atturo; Maurizio Barbara
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].

Authors:  K Braun; H-P Zenner; N Friese; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Factors associated with benefit of active middle ear implants compared to conventional hearing aids.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; William B Clinkscales; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  A New Trans-Tympanic Microphone Approach for Fully Implantable Hearing Devices.

Authors:  Seong Tak Woo; Dong Ho Shin; Hyung-Gyu Lim; Ki-Woong Seong; Peter Gottlieb; Sunil Puria; Kyu-Yup Lee; Jin-Ho Cho
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Carina® and Esteem®: a systematic review of fully implantable hearing devices.

Authors:  Janaina Oliveira Bentivi Pulcherio; Aline Gomes Bittencourt; Patrick Rademaker Burke; Rafael da Costa Monsanto; Rubens de Brito; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Implantable and semi-implantable hearing AIDS: a review of history, indications, and surgery.

Authors:  Aline Gomes Bittencourt; Patrick Rademaker Burke; Isabela de Souza Jardim; Rubens de Brito; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Anna Carolina de Oliveira Fonseca; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-09

Review 7.  Implantable hearing devices.

Authors:  Matthias Tisch
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

8.  Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid for Broad-Spectrum Amplification: Safety and Effectiveness Pivotal Study.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Rodney Perkins; Michael Murray; Suzanne Carr Levy; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  A technical review and evaluation of implantable sensors for hearing devices.

Authors:  Diego Calero; Stephan Paul; André Gesing; Fabio Alves; Júlio A Cordioli
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  A Vibro-Acoustic Hybrid Implantable Microphone for Middle Ear Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ki Woong Seong; Ha Jun Mun; Dong Ho Shin; Jong Hoon Kim; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Sunil Puria; Jin-Ho Cho
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.