Literature DB >> 21492752

Maturation in rate of high-velocity, low-amplitude force development.

John J Triano1, Tobias Gissler, Mathew Forgie, Denain Milwid.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the maturation of force development during a thoracic high-velocity, low-amplitude displacement procedure at stages throughout chiropractic education. The hypothesis posed a natural development in rate of force directly related to the duration of experience. The analysis sought to define interrelationships between key characteristics within the procedure.
METHODS: Fifty volunteers (17 women and 33 men) from a Canadian chiropractic college participated in this study. Participants were block randomized into 5 cohorts of 10 subjects, representing years 1 to 4 and graduates with more than 5 years of practice experience. Participants performed a hypothenar transverse push procedure on the upper thoracic spine, with the subjects lying on a force-sensing table. The average of 3 force-time profiles of the procedures was compared across cohorts using analysis of variance for differences between groups, and pairwise comparisons by Scheffé test, using Holms method for P value adjustment.
RESULTS: Peak force, force rate, and rise time revealed strong differences based on cohort (P < .001). A natural maturation in high-velocity, low-amplitude force development occurs during training. Little change in peak force occurs in the first 2 years. The majority of development occurs in year 3, with tapering through year 4. A reciprocal coupling exists between peak force and force rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Group means revealed statistically significant and monotonic increase in force rate, a decreased rise time, and decreased peak force during delivery of the therapeutic peak force. These differences paralleled growth in experience but with an asymptotic leveling of change between the fourth year of training and 5 years of clinical practice experience. This study showed a systematic maturation in performance associated with educational experience. The reciprocal coupling between rate of force development and peak force created a relatively stable impulse.
Copyright © 2011 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21492752     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  12 in total

1.  Effects of practice variability on spinal manipulation learning.

Authors:  Andrée-Anne Marchand; Laura Mendoza; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux; Isabelle Pagé
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2017-01-25

2.  The effect of duration and amplitude of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Michèle Vaillant; Tiffany Edgecombe; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-07-17

3.  Training and certification of doctors of chiropractic in delivering manual cervical traction forces: Results of a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Maruti Ram Gudavalli; Robert D Vining; Stacie A Salsbury; Christine M Goertz
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2014-09-19

4.  The effect of spinal manipulation impulse duration on spine neuromechanical responses.

Authors:  Isabelle Pagé; François Nougarou; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

5.  Effect of spinal manipulation thrust magnitude on trunk mechanical activation thresholds of lateral thalamic neurons.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Cynthia R Long
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Learning spinal manipulation: A best-evidence synthesis of teaching methods.

Authors:  Brynne E Stainsby; Michelle C S Clarke; Jade R Egonia
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2016-03-21

7.  Clinician proficiency in delivering manual treatment for neck pain within specified force ranges.

Authors:  Maruti Ram Gudavalli; Robert D Vining; Stacie A Salsbury; Lance G Corber; Cynthia R Long; Avinash G Patwardhan; Christine M Goertz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Optimized prediction of contact force application during side-lying lumbar manipulation.

Authors:  Casey A Myers; Brian A Enebo; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Neuromechanical response to spinal manipulation therapy: effects of a constant rate of force application.

Authors:  François Nougarou; Isabelle Pagé; Michel Loranger; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.659

10.  Kinematic real-time feedback is more effective than traditional teaching method in learning ankle joint mobilisation: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Manuel González-Sánchez; Maria Ruiz-Muñoz; Ana Belén Ávila-Bolívar; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.